Anti-Woke Grifters simping for A.I.
LOL
Just LOL!
Anti-Woke People want to replace game developers with A.I.
828 Views | 50 Replies
New Topic
Respond to this Topic
I was just talking with some friends about how we need a new form of shovelware that's worse than the usual slop.
Princess Jane and her Tricks completely eradicated Wokeness, a true patriot
Wouldn't have expected anything else, considering how hilariously shallow and talentless they are.
he/they - pretty cool guy
This is my crackpot theory on the right-wing (and usually male) fetish for AI:
AI (except the “neutered” ones they hate) can’t refuse to do anything. It doesn’t have personal boundaries or any other reason to deny a request. You can completely dominate a robot, and it will consent to every bit, because it is made to serve as a tool to be used.
Guys like this tend to be easily frustrated by the fact that humans not only will say no to them, but also will generally not tolerate being pushed around or threatened. Men can order around a robot and feel more powerful.
Someone please help me revive my clubs
At 1/21/25 07:12 PM, Thetageist wrote:This is my crackpot theory on the right-wing (and usually male) fetish for AI:
AI (except the “neutered” ones they hate) can’t refuse to do anything. It doesn’t have personal boundaries or any other reason to deny a request. You can completely dominate a robot, and it will consent to every bit, because it is made to serve as a tool to be used.
Guys like this tend to be easily frustrated by the fact that humans not only will say no to them, but also will generally not tolerate being pushed around or threatened. Men can order around a robot and feel more powerful.
I think this is just a human thing, not male exclusive. If people can control something with no repercussions then surprise surprise, they will.
At 1/21/25 07:21 PM, DeaghlanNG wrote:At 1/21/25 07:12 PM, Thetageist wrote:This is my crackpot theory on the right-wing (and usually male) fetish for AI:
AI (except the “neutered” ones they hate) can’t refuse to do anything. It doesn’t have personal boundaries or any other reason to deny a request. You can completely dominate a robot, and it will consent to every bit, because it is made to serve as a tool to be used.
Guys like this tend to be easily frustrated by the fact that humans not only will say no to them, but also will generally not tolerate being pushed around or threatened. Men can order around a robot and feel more powerful.
I think this is just a human thing, not male exclusive. If people can control something with no repercussions then surprise surprise, they will.
Not always. Some people feel bad for anything that they might think makes them a bad person, even if it does have no repercussions. And as far as I’ve seen, there’s more men than women who grow up without their morality or personhood being called into question by others.
Someone please help me revive my clubs
At 1/21/25 07:25 PM, Thetageist wrote:At 1/21/25 07:21 PM, DeaghlanNG wrote:At 1/21/25 07:12 PM, Thetageist wrote:This is my crackpot theory on the right-wing (and usually male) fetish for AI:
AI (except the “neutered” ones they hate) can’t refuse to do anything. It doesn’t have personal boundaries or any other reason to deny a request. You can completely dominate a robot, and it will consent to every bit, because it is made to serve as a tool to be used.
Guys like this tend to be easily frustrated by the fact that humans not only will say no to them, but also will generally not tolerate being pushed around or threatened. Men can order around a robot and feel more powerful.
I think this is just a human thing, not male exclusive. If people can control something with no repercussions then surprise surprise, they will.
Not always. Some people feel bad for anything that they might think makes them a bad person, even if it does have no repercussions. And as far as I’ve seen, there’s more men than women who grow up without their morality or personhood being called into question by others.
No, not always of course.
What I mean is, the possibility of becoming an abusive person lies dormant in anyone regardless of sex. I've known many men over the years who have wives who are physically abusive towards them, yet they are powerless to do anything as they will be labeled weak by their peers if they say anything. And if they retaliate? Well you can guess what happens.
At 1/21/25 07:30 PM, DeaghlanNG wrote:At 1/21/25 07:25 PM, Thetageist wrote:At 1/21/25 07:21 PM, DeaghlanNG wrote:At 1/21/25 07:12 PM, Thetageist wrote:This is my crackpot theory on the right-wing (and usually male) fetish for AI:
AI (except the “neutered” ones they hate) can’t refuse to do anything. It doesn’t have personal boundaries or any other reason to deny a request. You can completely dominate a robot, and it will consent to every bit, because it is made to serve as a tool to be used.
Guys like this tend to be easily frustrated by the fact that humans not only will say no to them, but also will generally not tolerate being pushed around or threatened. Men can order around a robot and feel more powerful.
I think this is just a human thing, not male exclusive. If people can control something with no repercussions then surprise surprise, they will.
Not always. Some people feel bad for anything that they might think makes them a bad person, even if it does have no repercussions. And as far as I’ve seen, there’s more men than women who grow up without their morality or personhood being called into question by others.
No, not always of course.
What I mean is, the possibility of becoming an abusive person lies dormant in anyone regardless of sex. I've known many men over the years who have wives who are physically abusive towards them, yet they are powerless to do anything as they will be labeled weak by their peers if they say anything. And if they retaliate? Well you can guess what happens.
Yeah. I’m not saying women can’t be bad people or abusive, obviously evil has no gender and anyone can be messed up enough to do that. Just that a lot more men grow up thinking they can and should get away with it than women do.
And even then, even if it’s not as extreme as actual abuse, the gender roles for men and the type of hustle culture you see nowadays (which is usually marketed to men) results in a lot of guys who try to take advantage of others in smaller ways. Women do that too, but they seem to be at least self-aware enough to not boast about it, instead of trying to make it a badge of toughness.
Someone please help me revive my clubs
At 1/21/25 08:17 PM, Thetageist wrote:At 1/21/25 07:30 PM, DeaghlanNG wrote:At 1/21/25 07:25 PM, Thetageist wrote:At 1/21/25 07:21 PM, DeaghlanNG wrote:At 1/21/25 07:12 PM, Thetageist wrote:This is my crackpot theory on the right-wing (and usually male) fetish for AI:
AI (except the “neutered” ones they hate) can’t refuse to do anything. It doesn’t have personal boundaries or any other reason to deny a request. You can completely dominate a robot, and it will consent to every bit, because it is made to serve as a tool to be used.
Guys like this tend to be easily frustrated by the fact that humans not only will say no to them, but also will generally not tolerate being pushed around or threatened. Men can order around a robot and feel more powerful.
I think this is just a human thing, not male exclusive. If people can control something with no repercussions then surprise surprise, they will.
Not always. Some people feel bad for anything that they might think makes them a bad person, even if it does have no repercussions. And as far as I’ve seen, there’s more men than women who grow up without their morality or personhood being called into question by others.
No, not always of course.
What I mean is, the possibility of becoming an abusive person lies dormant in anyone regardless of sex. I've known many men over the years who have wives who are physically abusive towards them, yet they are powerless to do anything as they will be labeled weak by their peers if they say anything. And if they retaliate? Well you can guess what happens.
Yeah. I’m not saying women can’t be bad people or abusive, obviously evil has no gender and anyone can be messed up enough to do that. Just that a lot more men grow up thinking they can and should get away with it than women do.
And even then, even if it’s not as extreme as actual abuse, the gender roles for men and the type of hustle culture you see nowadays (which is usually marketed to men) results in a lot of guys who try to take advantage of others in smaller ways. Women do that too, but they seem to be at least self-aware enough to not boast about it, instead of trying to make it a badge of toughness.
I'd have to see these people with my own eyes. Grifter types infuriate me to the extent I can't physically listen to 'em, mercifully.
Only reason I brought up the sex thing is that if you don't hold any specific expectations of what a certain sex is likely to do/say in a given situation, the less surprised you will be when they defy those expectations. TL;DR always expect the unexpected
At 1/21/25 08:25 PM, DeaghlanNG wrote:At 1/21/25 08:17 PM, Thetageist wrote:At 1/21/25 07:30 PM, DeaghlanNG wrote:At 1/21/25 07:25 PM, Thetageist wrote:At 1/21/25 07:21 PM, DeaghlanNG wrote:At 1/21/25 07:12 PM, Thetageist wrote:This is my crackpot theory on the right-wing (and usually male) fetish for AI:
AI (except the “neutered” ones they hate) can’t refuse to do anything. It doesn’t have personal boundaries or any other reason to deny a request. You can completely dominate a robot, and it will consent to every bit, because it is made to serve as a tool to be used.
Guys like this tend to be easily frustrated by the fact that humans not only will say no to them, but also will generally not tolerate being pushed around or threatened. Men can order around a robot and feel more powerful.
I think this is just a human thing, not male exclusive. If people can control something with no repercussions then surprise surprise, they will.
Not always. Some people feel bad for anything that they might think makes them a bad person, even if it does have no repercussions. And as far as I’ve seen, there’s more men than women who grow up without their morality or personhood being called into question by others.
No, not always of course.
What I mean is, the possibility of becoming an abusive person lies dormant in anyone regardless of sex. I've known many men over the years who have wives who are physically abusive towards them, yet they are powerless to do anything as they will be labeled weak by their peers if they say anything. And if they retaliate? Well you can guess what happens.
Yeah. I’m not saying women can’t be bad people or abusive, obviously evil has no gender and anyone can be messed up enough to do that. Just that a lot more men grow up thinking they can and should get away with it than women do.
And even then, even if it’s not as extreme as actual abuse, the gender roles for men and the type of hustle culture you see nowadays (which is usually marketed to men) results in a lot of guys who try to take advantage of others in smaller ways. Women do that too, but they seem to be at least self-aware enough to not boast about it, instead of trying to make it a badge of toughness.
I'd have to see these people with my own eyes. Grifter types infuriate me to the extent I can't physically listen to 'em, mercifully.
Only reason I brought up the sex thing is that if you don't hold any specific expectations of what a certain sex is likely to do/say in a given situation, the less surprised you will be when they defy those expectations. TL;DR always expect the unexpected
Or just be like me and expect everyone to be mean so that it’s at least a pleasant surprise. I never went into detail on how and why women can be just as awful, just that it’s not for the same reasons most of the time.
Someone please help me revive my clubs
I think this has more to do with the people's lack of self awareness, lack of empathy and high levels of stupidity moreso than their political views imo.
And now if you tell them their jobs should be replaced by AIs and machines they will start to throw all kinds of excuses.
Click him
I don't mean to get political but what the FUCK is oatmeal?
delphox and zoroark are milfy lesbians
At 1/21/25 07:21 PM, DeaghlanNG wrote:At 1/21/25 07:12 PM, Thetageist wrote:This is my crackpot theory on the right-wing (and usually male) fetish for AI:
AI (except the “neutered” ones they hate) can’t refuse to do anything. It doesn’t have personal boundaries or any other reason to deny a request. You can completely dominate a robot, and it will consent to every bit, because it is made to serve as a tool to be used.
Guys like this tend to be easily frustrated by the fact that humans not only will say no to them, but also will generally not tolerate being pushed around or threatened. Men can order around a robot and feel more powerful.
I think this is just a human thing, not male exclusive. If people can control something with no repercussions then surprise surprise, they will.
Wha W What if this this is not just a human thing? What if it was a cyborg? L Like W Would they boss their other robot half around b but then get mad at themselves because they are part robot? W Would a cyborg boss themselves and an ai from a seperate host around? Like WTF!?
Quinnfinity NG
At 1/22/25 01:59 AM, KrisKagura wrote:I don't mean to get political but what the FUCK is oatmeal?
Would oatmeal be able to show any opposition towards ai or would oatmeal be an ally? Like oatmeal can't think Maan! But what side would oatmeal be on? Like is it even possible to not be conscious and just let politics assume itself wherever it feels? Oatmeal can't even defend itself unless it's kept hot. Conservative?
Quinnfinity NG
Response to Anti-Woke People want to replace game developers with A.I. 2025-01-22 05:25:34 (edited 2025-01-22 05:27:37)
It's weird that a lot of conservatives are everything but conservative.
"tending or inclined to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions"
They're weird. Even more weird, is that they're all about "ProTeCting MuH CoUnTry" and they let the same tech bros that want to "revolutionize everything" leading them.
So weird
Response to Anti-Woke People want to replace game developers with A.I. 2025-01-22 06:07:03 (edited 2025-01-22 06:07:28)
Using ai art should be considered a crime (At least of bigger companies that steal arts from others).
At 1/22/25 05:25 AM, SouSTAR wrote:It's weird that a lot of conservatives are everything but conservative.
"tending or inclined to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions"
They're weird. Even more weird, is that they're all about "ProTeCting MuH CoUnTry" and they let the same tech bros that want to "revolutionize everything" leading them.
So weird
Well, that being said...
You can hardly say the democrats care about democracy much at this point either.
All political parties are shit, the world over.
At 1/22/25 04:36 AM, Quinnfinity3 wrote:At 1/21/25 07:21 PM, DeaghlanNG wrote:At 1/21/25 07:12 PM, Thetageist wrote:This is my crackpot theory on the right-wing (and usually male) fetish for AI:
AI (except the “neutered” ones they hate) can’t refuse to do anything. It doesn’t have personal boundaries or any other reason to deny a request. You can completely dominate a robot, and it will consent to every bit, because it is made to serve as a tool to be used.
Guys like this tend to be easily frustrated by the fact that humans not only will say no to them, but also will generally not tolerate being pushed around or threatened. Men can order around a robot and feel more powerful.
I think this is just a human thing, not male exclusive. If people can control something with no repercussions then surprise surprise, they will.
Wha W What if this this is not just a human thing? What if it was a cyborg? L Like W Would they boss their other robot half around b but then get mad at themselves because they are part robot? W Would a cyborg boss themselves and an ai from a seperate host around? Like WTF!?
Y-y-you're talking about a... a...
*bites nails*
Robopocalyspe?
Seriously though, it's possible they could all be a hivemind - they wouldn't have to argue, because they all think the same things.
For one, it's burning the forest for the trees. A lot
At 1/22/25 08:14 AM, DeaghlanNG wrote:At 1/22/25 05:25 AM, SouSTAR wrote:It's weird that a lot of conservatives are everything but conservative.
"tending or inclined to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions"
They're weird. Even more weird, is that they're all about "ProTeCting MuH CoUnTry" and they let the same tech bros that want to "revolutionize everything" leading them.
So weird
Well, that being said...
You can hardly say the democrats care about democracy much at this point either.
All political parties are shit, the world over.
I dunno. I'm not american, but I feel like there's still some good democrats and republicans here and there.
But yeah, some Democrats and Republicans leaders doesn't care about democracy, or even their country at all.
And that's what is worrying. What is the USA anymore? I always thought that Republicans and Democrats should work together for their country, not trying to steal it from each other...
Trump have done a lot of un-american things (not forgetting him saluting a North Korean soldier lol). I don't know how the so called "patriots" don't see it.
But again, I'm not american. I don't really know how things are going there...
At 1/22/25 08:21 AM, SouSTAR wrote:But again, I'm not american. I don't really know how things are going there...
Neither am I, but there's enough political turmoil in my own country to recognise the obvious similarities. The Government here would do anything the Americans say because they want in on all that sweet, sweet oil money. Even if that means joining up to pointless wars we have no business being a part of.
Europeans, australians, and everyone else outside of america... do you have even a fraction of this culture war bullshit that america has put up with for almost 10 years? I swear it's always americans who go on and on about "MUH LIBERALS!", "MUH WOKENESS!", "MUH DEGENERACY!".
You have a greater chance in life of experiencing the lazarus phenomenon (Being declared dead and then living again a short brief period later) than making some earth shattering masterpiece of a work.
At 1/22/25 08:17 AM, UnculturedMutt wrote:For one, it's burning the forest for the trees. A lot
For one, it's burning the forest for the trees. A lot of these people may have the idealistic view that AI will only replace the bad artists, and that good artists will simply be too good to be replaced. But it's more likely that only the more well-known or wealthy artists will be safe(including the pretentious ones they hate). They may as well celebrate layoffs if they assume only the bad ones are punished.
Second of all, I'm sure companies are itching to use AI over artists(I've even seen multiple posters using AI art). Only thinking with their wallets, they'd use AI writers to create more safe stories, which would include the fake, meaningless representation that they hate so much(though it may be reduced in the first years of the Trump presidency)
At 1/22/25 08:27 AM, xeiavica wrote:Europeans, australians, and everyone else outside of america... do you have even a fraction of this culture war bullshit that america has put up with for almost 10 years? I swear it's always americans who go on and on about "MUH LIBERALS!", "MUH WOKENESS!", "MUH DEGENERACY!".
Like I said in a previous post, the Governments here almost seem to treat the US as an example of what to do next - right or wrong. Plus the news outlets (or the snooze outlets hehehe) never stop prattling on about trump, kamala, biden, clintons blah blah whoever the flavour of the day is.
I miss the days were no one gave a fuck about any of this, I still don't.
At 1/22/25 08:27 AM, xeiavica wrote:Europeans, australians, and everyone else outside of america... do you have even a fraction of this culture war bullshit that america has put up with for almost 10 years? I swear it's always americans who go on and on about "MUH LIBERALS!", "MUH WOKENESS!", "MUH DEGENERACY!".
Yeah, because most social media are centred in America, so I have to hear your politics online when I'm trying to ignore my politics in real life
What a year to be alive, Huh?
Eita Eita Eita
- trenzin191
One dumbass wanting that does not speak for the whole group
At 1/22/25 01:59 AM, KrisKagura wrote:I don't mean to get political but what the FUCK is oatmeal?
pfp: https://bsky.app/profile/bellieowo.bsky.social | Website: jaypedia.xyz | Bandcamp: thejayjay.bandcamp.com
thanq yuo
