Your take on Islam seems more like folkloric tale than a well-researched, logical analysis. You're comparing apples and oranges, dude - a divine religion claiming infallibility vs. a man-made ideology designed to keep the masses in check. Those in power mess with temporary rules as if the afterlife doesn't matter, squeezing people into a trivial, liberal box so they won't ponder their existence or question their culture. They've been fooled by relativism and widespread doubts about Islam.
As a born-and-raised Muslim, I've encountered strict rulings prohibiting things without careful examination of the texts. But even if we assume they're legit, it doesn't make Islam inferior to your ideology. Islam still provides a holistic, logical explanation for our existence and gives you a noble purpose: worshipping your Creator. You won't keel over if you don't draw or listen to music.
Islam isn't trivial or oppressive like you're trying to portray. Even though my picture is not digital yet mostly photographic which copies the imagery of Allah yet If you dig deeper into the rulings on these matters, you'll find a hadith that limits the prohibition on drawing picturese even digital ones. For example, "Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Angels (of mercy) do not enter a house where there are pictures.'" The subnarrator Busr added: "Then Zaid fell ill and we paid him a visit. Behold! There was, hanging at his door, a curtain decorated with a picture. I said to 'Ubaidullah Al-Khaulani, the step son of Maimuna, the wife of the Prophet (ﷺ) , "Didn't Zaid tell us about the picture the day before yesterday?" 'Ubaidullah said, "Didn't you hear him saying: 'except a design in a garment'?" Thus, there's an exception for designs on garments, meaning pictures are allowed as long as they're not oversized or worshipped like idols or used in un-Islamic ways, like drawing a woman without hijab. Similarly, the famous hadith in Bukhari forbids music collectively when accompanied by other atrocities like adultery, alcohol, and obscene singing. Other hadiths suggest music is permissible, so the ruling isn't clear-cut. Personally, I avoid obscene lyrics in my music, which allows me to compose and play.
Now, regarding Islamic theocracy, I'm not saying your site must follow Islam Sharia, but at least use common sense. Even non-Muslims and Jews in the West oppose the annihilation of Israel and blockading people without reason just to please invaders and oppress the Middle East with Zionist occupation. The UN's supposedly universal code allows people of the land to fight back against invaders, so it's not fair to call the October 7th attack terroristic. Also, there's no clear evidence that HMS intentionally targeted innocents, and if they did, why haven't they continued to do so? They only attack military sites. But, if you dig into non-mainstream news, you'll find that the IDF itself acknowledged their fault in targeting IL people and killing their own soldiers in that day, not to mention targeting employees of the World Food Program later despite clear signs that they're a universal non-profit organization. Evidence and reality show that the IDF is terroristic, not HMS, and people in the West, especially university students, are waking up to this masquerade of terrorism.
Don't get me wrong - I'm not trying to be intolerant of your culture, even though I recognize it as atrocious and lustful rather than objective and ethical. It's just common sense that if you're truly democratic, you should support the Palestinian people's quest for freedom unless you reconize them as animals like Israel racist media say. You shouldn't violate others' freedom of speech while preserving only your own, because that's called hegemony, and hegemony is incompatible with democracy.
As for enhancing songs, it's not as easy or trivial as it seems. It requires knowledge of things like EQ, limiters, compressors, exciters, imagers, and stabilizers, and not everyone has access to the same efficient tools. If it were that simple, why would bands release remastered versions of their albums decades later? Mixing and mastering can be complex and even paid work.
The same goes for AI songs. Prompting AI isn't trivial, as not everyone understands English or how to get the best response from AI. It requires continuous supervision to create something worth listening to. You're being a bit aggressive in censoring AI music, but mark my words - one day, AI music will take over and sound humanized as technology advances. I didn't just publish raw AI songs from Suno; I tried to humanize them a bit. You disregarded my work for no good reason. If it sounds good, why limit it? People don't care how much effort you put in.