At 3/3/23 10:49 AM, Exedor wrote:

At 3/3/23 10:08 AM, g2961 wrote:Have the moderators stopped watching here at all? Because I have already left links to re-uploads 4 days ago, but no one deletes them.

Maybe you've spammed the thread with so many posts and comments that now it's all noise instead of discussion. To report rule breaking items, flag them. BBS threads are for discussion, not the method for reporting submissions. But also, be patient. Mods don't have schedules where we work from 8-5 and get paid every payday. We volunteer our time and effort and donate time out of our lives to keep this site great.

At 3/3/23 11:05 AM, Seth wrote:

At 3/3/23 11:02 AM, g2961 wrote:

At 3/3/23 10:56 AM, Seth wrote:

At 3/3/23 10:49 AM, Exedor wrote:

At 3/3/23 10:08 AM, g2961 wrote:Have the moderators stopped watching here at all? Because I have already left links to re-uploads 4 days ago, but no one deletes them.

Maybe you've spammed the thread with so many posts and comments that now it's all noise instead of discussion. To report rule breaking items, flag them. BBS threads are for discussion, not the method for reporting submissions. But also, be patient. Mods don't have schedules where we work from 8-5 and get paid every payday. We volunteer our time and effort and donate time out of our lives to keep this site great.

Well, shit, I remember a certain person digging up a ton of stolen content in 2016. It was overwhelming to the point where they made that person a mod lol

I actually found too much stolen content, but I couldn't properly explain that they were stolen, but I'm sure of it, since I checked them for copyright.

This is a bit of a conundrum that I've solved by posting in this thread saying that I can't pinpoint the source, but I believe it may be stolen, someone please help. I tend to keep posts like that to a minimum and isolated from posts where I know the source and link it below the link to the stolen track.

At 3/3/23 10:56 AM, Seth wrote:

At 3/3/23 10:49 AM, Exedor wrote:

At 3/3/23 10:08 AM, g2961 wrote:Have the moderators stopped watching here at all? Because I have already left links to re-uploads 4 days ago, but no one deletes them.

Maybe you've spammed the thread with so many posts and comments that now it's all noise instead of discussion. To report rule breaking items, flag them. BBS threads are for discussion, not the method for reporting submissions. But also, be patient. Mods don't have schedules where we work from 8-5 and get paid every payday. We volunteer our time and effort and donate time out of our lives to keep this site great.

Well, shit, I remember a certain person digging up a ton of stolen content in 2016. It was overwhelming to the point where they made that person a mod lol

At 3/3/23 12:50 PM, tox wrote:The BBS is for discussions primarily

This thread is built to be the stepping stone between
I think that this submission is flagable for 1, 2, 3, can someone help me out to figure it out
And
Should we flag this submission

If you want to post an item your post should look something like this:
###########

1. Basic description of the problem, basic explanation of the situation
2. Link to the original content you are referencing
3. Link to the content you are having problems with
4. Further explanation on the topic
##########

If you follow that format, you will have much much higher success in flagging submissions correctly, and having timely responses to your problems. The more people that can flag a submission with correct details, the faster the response will be

1 person flaging, 1 week before reply.
3 people flagging, 2 days before reply.
8 people or more, a few hours before reply.

People just need to be able to understand and follow what you're trying to convey, a lot of the posts that you make. I have no idea who are you are trying to reference, what time period in the submissions that you're trying to reference, the given audio that you're trying to reference. So I can't really do anything. I'm sure that it's the same for a lot of other people

At 3/3/23 01:04 PM, g2961 wrote:

At 3/3/23 12:54 PM, tox wrote:My offer still stands. If you want me to give you an example of how I flag audio, I seem to have a very high success rate with any of the flags that I put down.

Can you give an example to consolidate this example?

At 3/3/23 02:11 PM, tox wrote:

At 3/3/23 01:04 PM, g2961 wrote:

At 3/3/23 12:54 PM, tox wrote:My offer still stands. If you want me to give you an example of how I flag audio, I seem to have a very high success rate with any of the flags that I put down.

Can you give an example to consolidate this example?

When I get home in a few hours and have my headphones I can do this

At 3/3/23 02:49 PM, g2961 wrote:

At 3/3/23 02:11 PM, tox wrote:

At 3/3/23 01:04 PM, g2961 wrote:

At 3/3/23 12:54 PM, tox wrote:My offer still stands. If you want me to give you an example of how I flag audio, I seem to have a very high success rate with any of the flags that I put down.

Can you give an example to consolidate this example?

When I get home in a few hours and have my headphones I can do this

Okay!

At 3/3/23 09:29 PM, tox wrote:

At 3/3/23 02:49 PM, g2961 wrote:

At 3/3/23 02:11 PM, tox wrote:

At 3/3/23 01:04 PM, g2961 wrote:

At 3/3/23 12:54 PM, tox wrote:My offer still stands. If you want me to give you an example of how I flag audio, I seem to have a very high success rate with any of the flags that I put down.

Can you give an example to consolidate this example?

When I get home in a few hours and have my headphones I can do this

Okay!

alright here is one:
THIS IS AN EXAMPLE FOR @g2961, PLEASE DO NOT FLAG THIS SUBMISSION (yet...) because I want them to see it

################
hey everyone, I think this is stolen because the dates and names don't line up
https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/986958
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7lsjck69y8&ab_channel=JoshA-Topic
I don't think that it belongs to the author, does anyone else agree with me? I want to call it on Do not upload audio that you did not create and have full rights to.
################

THIS IS AN EXAMPLE FOR @g2961, PLEASE DO NOT FLAG THIS SUBMISSION (yet...) because I want them to see it

At 3/4/23 08:58 AM, g2961 wrote:

At 3/3/23 09:29 PM, tox wrote:

At 3/3/23 02:49 PM, g2961 wrote:

At 3/3/23 02:11 PM, tox wrote:

At 3/3/23 01:04 PM, g2961 wrote:

At 3/3/23 12:54 PM, tox wrote:My offer still stands. If you want me to give you an example of how I flag audio, I seem to have a very high success rate with any of the flags that I put down.

Can you give an example to consolidate this example?

When I get home in a few hours and have my headphones I can do this

Okay!

alright here is one:
THIS IS AN EXAMPLE FOR @g2961, PLEASE DO NOT FLAG THIS SUBMISSION (yet...) because I want them to see it

################
hey everyone, I think this is stolen because the dates and names don't line up
https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/986958
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7lsjck69y8&ab_channel=JoshA-Topic
I don't think that it belongs to the author, does anyone else agree with me? I want to call it on Do not upload audio that you did not create and have full rights to.
################

THIS IS AN EXAMPLE FOR @g2961, PLEASE DO NOT FLAG THIS SUBMISSION (yet...) because I want them to see it

Thanks for sample!

At 3/4/23 08:35 PM, tox wrote:

At 3/4/23 06:17 PM, g2961 wrote:The vocals were taken from here -https://youtu.be/jhTXmuHrnac
This remix - https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/1069917

a mod can weigh in on this, but we usually don't care about non English lyrics... "most" of the time?
i cant understand what is being said, how am i supposed to flag something from another language that the singer is actually singing about a different thing or idea
I usually stay away from songs like this for this reason

At 3/4/23 06:21 PM, g2961 wrote:
This is a remake 1:1
Original - https://youtu.be/14vzeTvZe5I
Remake - https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/1083347
This also violates the NG rules, but only about the 1:1 remake.

the 1:1 rules is used to eliminate songs that are exact copies, every lyric, every beat, every instrument, the speed or tempo, everything, its a very narrow and hyper focused version of the Do not upload audio that you did not create and have full rights to
that being said, the audio link that you sent only focuses on a single piano beat, i doubt that that will be enough to take this piece down

as for the actual stolen audio, could you be more specific about the time frames that you want us to listen to in this?

At 3/4/23 06:27 PM, g2961 wrote:
Hello, this is stolen audio.
Original - https://youtu.be/e4TUSKFkUWI
Reupload - https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/1043782
You can't upload someone else's work, because it's not according to the rules of the site.

this is a perfect example of the 1:1 rule in action

At 3/4/23 06:30 PM, g2961 wrote:
Stolen song.
Original - https://youtu.be/W9GXqCBAZb0
Stolen - https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/1052318
It's already clear that this is stolen audio.

perfect

At 3/4/23 06:31 PM, g2961 wrote:
Again stolen.
Original - https://youtu.be/z3zMnhdVGNc
Stolen - https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/1197804

perfect

At 3/4/23 06:31 PM, g2961 wrote:
Slowed version - https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/1197315
https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/1197323

this is an example of a the nightcore rule, sooo... perfect

At 3/4/23 06:34 PM, g2961 wrote:
Stolen and distorted song.
Original -https://youtu.be/3i3DByv7Ty8
Stolen - https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/1173869

a mod will need to weigh in on this

Original sound stolen - https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/1167718

perfect
---------
see, i knew that you could do this, we can all follow where you are going, what you are referencing, who, what, when, where, why, details, everything
good job

At 3/4/23 11:05 PM, Leavesz wrote:

At 3/4/23 08:35 PM, tox wrote:

At 3/4/23 06:27 PM, g2961 wrote:Hello, this is stolen audio.
Original - https://youtu.be/e4TUSKFkUWI
Reupload - https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/1043782
You can't upload someone else's work, because it's not according to the rules of the site.

this is a perfect example of the 1:1 rule in action

But that doesn't seem to be a remake, the 1:1 rule applies to remakes doesn't it? This one is just a reupload of the track, the audio pretty much cancels out if you play both the stolen ng upload and the original upload at the same time with one's polarity inverted. It should be flagged as stolen audio and not as a 1:1 remake in this case.

unless i misread something in the audio guidelines