At 5/24/06 07:04 AM, Goatchrist wrote:
At 5/24/06 05:33 AM, duffeknol wrote:
uhm... Manowar is more like the school example of typical heavy metal... always been actually :/
I agree.
I don't. Listen to Fighting the World, then listen to this. Until you've listened to it, don't slam it. Hell, listen to Louder than Hell then listen to Warriors of the World.
Ghoul, I don't think that lyrical themes can determine musical styles. People often call Amon Amarth "Viking Metal" just because of their lyrical themes. Even when you listen to them, you feel like being right in the middle of a viking battle, but it's still Death/Melodeath Metal.
Ya, I agree. I was referring more to the 3 symphonic tracks, the use of acoustic guitars, the wagnerian choruses, the total fucking "This isn't Manowar" sound. It really doesn't sound like Manowar at all, save for the vocals.
and I don't think Warriors of the World sounds like Viking Metal at all, yes, the songs are more epic and darker than before, but it's still Heavy Metal.
I humbly disagree. Sure, it's not Viking BLACK metal, but if Bathory is viking metal, so is this. It's epic-er and darker than Bathory's Twilight of the Gods, so I'd say Manowar have entered Viking metal. Trust me, as your local Manowar expert (I have Fighting the World, Kings of Metal, Triumph of Steel, Warriors of the World, bits of Sign of the Hammer, bits of Hail to England, bits of Into Glory Ride, and bits of Battle Hymns.) Trust me on this one, this release DEFINITELY stands out among the rest. It's thousands times more epic. Viking metal isn't a genre, either. WotW is a new genre, then: Viking heavy metal, if not for Swords in the Wind alone.