00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme
Upgrade Your Account!

HO HO HOPE you become a Newgrounds Supporter this year!

We're working hard to give you the best site possible, but we have bills to pay and community support is vital to keep things going and growing. Thank you for considering!

Become a Supporter so NG can see another Christmas!

Metal Hell

3,308,003 Views | 77,479 Replies
New Topic Respond to this Topic

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 01:35:20


At 12/1/10 01:31 AM, K2LU wrote:
At 12/1/10 01:26 AM, smeagol1 wrote:
When you get used to the basic shit start asking us for more bands. There are FEW good American Black Metal bands,dispute what penis might say.
Well, I must admit I don't listen much to black metal. I listen mostly to heavy metal and thrash metal. Though I like Kvelertak a lot, and they're like this hardcore punk, black metal, rock 'n' roll type of thing.

Black metal is a acquired taste, Just like beer. It's certainly not for everyone but their is plenty of bands if your interested. Sweden has some good bands too btw.


Enter Thy Metal Hell

www.infowars.com Because There Is A War On For Your Mind.

BBS Signature

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 01:42:28


Ross Bay Cult.

Fuck Norway.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 02:34:05


At 12/1/10 02:30 AM, Xarnor wrote: OK this is something that I've really been wondering about:

What makes heavy metal "real"? I see people talking about different bands in here, and Dimmu Borgir seems to be disliked. I have Puritanical Euphoric Misanthropia, I love the atmosphere it creates, great symphonic elements, awesome drums (crappy trigger samples though haha), excellent mixing. What's wrong with them?

What earns a band the "real" label?

Not trying to start an argument by the way... just a few honest questions of a 15 year old discovering heavy metal...

Asking other people won't give you a satisfactory answer. What you need to do is go out and listen to more bands, and then you'll discover why Dimmur Borgir is so disliked.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 02:48:04


Look at there last two albums and videos and you'll know why they are shit. The only tr00 black metal albums are their first two albums, However I do enjoy everything up till Stormbl@st re-recorded everything else is shit.

Having a smiling faggot like Galder in your band doesn't help ether.

Enter Thy Metal Hell

www.infowars.com Because There Is A War On For Your Mind.

BBS Signature

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 07:52:47


At 12/1/10 03:08 AM, Xarnor wrote: So now, my other question: what are the qualifications for "real" or tr00 or whatever heavy metal?

No gimmicks. No trends. No selling out. No posers. No wannabes.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 12:03:49


At 12/1/10 01:42 AM, Dalnaki wrote: Ross Bay Cult.

LEGIONS OF DEATH ARISE COME TO SLAUGHTER

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 12:16:46


Shit, I'm listening to Agalloch, Pale Folklore album... shit is intense and beautiful.


Liberals defend the exploitation of man by man, Conservatives defend the reverse.

BBS Signature

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 12:25:59


At 11/30/10 09:33 PM, Nev wrote:
At 11/30/10 08:31 PM, K2LU wrote: Rise Against isn't metal...
I like this guy already.

K2LU for metalhead '10!

At 11/30/10 11:17 PM, K2LU wrote: So, turns out Immortal is from my hometown... I did not know that.

What are you waiting for?

At 12/1/10 02:30 AM, Xarnor wrote: What makes heavy metal "real"? I see people talking about different bands in here, and Dimmu Borgir seems to be disliked.

I still don't fully understand it myself. Sure, their appearances are awful but from what I heard from them, they're nothing terrible. OK, maybe the last two albums sound really bad but the rest isn't anything wretched to my ears. Are they in the same leagues as Immortal, though? Of course not.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 12:41:25


At 12/1/10 12:25 PM, Bahamut wrote:
At 11/30/10 09:33 PM, Nev wrote:
At 11/30/10 08:31 PM, K2LU wrote: Rise Against isn't metal...
I like this guy already.
K2LU for metalhead '10!

I feel so accepted.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 13:04:12


At 12/1/10 02:43 AM, Xarnor wrote: I've heard a lot of songs that black metal fans claim to be "the best" but most of them have awful mixing with crackling distortion everywhere, empty guitar sounds, almost non-existent drums, and the same riff over and over and over changing a bit here and there.

you say it like they're bad things! :P

black metal takes time to get into, you don't listen to black metal for the same reasons you listen to other music, necessarily.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 14:16:09


At 12/1/10 01:04 PM, D3NTATUS wrote: black metal takes time to get into, you don't listen to black metal for the same reasons you listen to other music, necessarily.

Doesn't it matter what type of Black Metal you listen to though? I don't know much about it but I've seen the guys here discuss Depressive Black Metal and Symphonic Black Metal, and there's probably others.

For example if I was in a good mood I wouldn't exactly crank up some Make A Change..Kill Yourself..right?

My point is do you guys think you would have be in a specific mood to fully enjoy certain genres of metal? I just want to see if anyone else is like me.


I love metal like crackheads love anal. and crack.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 16:00:54


At 12/1/10 02:16 PM, ZpLiNtEh wrote: Doesn't it matter what type of Black Metal you listen to though? I don't know much about it but I've seen the guys here discuss Depressive Black Metal and Symphonic Black Metal, and there's probably others.

Well I meant not the mood necessarily (though that is part of it), but the musical techniques itself. What I meant was like, if you wanted to listen to something easy to listen to and poppy and accessible, you shouldn't listen to black metal because those aren't the sort of things that black metal tries to evoke. You want to listen to black metal when you want to listen to something sparse and angry and full of hatred. I dunno exactly how to articulate what I mean, but yeah that's basically it.

My point is do you guys think you would have be in a specific mood to fully enjoy certain genres of metal? I just want to see if anyone else is like me.

I have to be in a specific mood to listen to metal in general, except for stoner metal. When I'm in a partying mood, it's thrash. Other genres have their place but I don't really listen to them all that much-most times I listen to metal, it's for a nostalgia thing.

There needs to be metal for psychedelics because there is just not enough psychedelic metal.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 16:07:26


At 12/1/10 02:16 PM, ZpLiNtEh wrote:
My point is do you guys think you would have be in a specific mood to fully enjoy certain genres of metal? I just want to see if anyone else is like me.

Well, whenever I'm feeling angry or depressed I tend to listen to more "angry" metal. But other than that, not really.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 17:29:46


I'm back. Be angry. Which brings me to:

At 12/1/10 02:16 PM, ZpLiNtEh wrote: My point is do you guys think you would have be in a specific mood to fully enjoy certain genres of metal? I just want to see if anyone else is like me.

Angry: Megadeth, Killswitch Engage, certain Metallica songs
Happy: Blue Oyster Cult, Queensryche, Corrosion of Conformity
Calm: Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin, any "original" heavy metal
Sad: Alice in Chains, Korn, Soundgarden, any alternative metal

It's weird how that happens.


Hi, I'm a teenager who draws. Call me Wocky.

My deviantArt | My Tumblr | My Pixiv

----

BBS Signature

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 17:46:09


At 12/1/10 05:29 PM, MaraquanWocky wrote: I'm back. Be angry. Which brings me to:

Angry: Megadeth, Killswitch Engage, certain Metallica songs
Happy: Blue Oyster Cult, Queensryche, Corrosion of Conformity
Calm: Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin, any "original" heavy metal
Sad: Alice in Chains, Korn, Soundgarden, any alternative metal

The only bands in that list I would even consider metal were Megadeth and Black Sabbath.
The rest are metalcore, grunge, or hard rock. Even Black Sabbath are debateable but I consider them the biggest influence to doom metal so metal enough for me.

I usually let my mood choose what I listen to, but sometimes I just fall into a "phase for a few days to a week of certain genres. Like I might only listen to death metal for a week straight and than not listen to any death metal for a month, things like that.
I do find I can listen to Avant-Garde metal almost any time. Just fits my taste perfectly I suppose.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 19:24:45


At 12/1/10 04:00 PM, D3NTATUS wrote: You want to listen to black metal when you want to listen to something sparse and angry and full of hatred. I dunno exactly how to articulate what I mean, but yeah that's basically it.

That sounds about right :) Yea I agree with you man

I have to be in a specific mood to listen to metal in general, except for stoner metal. When I'm in a partying mood, it's thrash. Other genres have their place but I don't really listen to them all that much-most times I listen to metal, it's for a nostalgia thing.

Same mate, though I can pretty much listen to Municipal Waste, Dragonforce, Tool or Baroness no matter what mood I'm in haha.

There needs to be metal for psychedelics because there is just not enough psychedelic metal.

True dat. I'm getting bored of listening to Infected Mushroom, I need something heavy for that mood dammit!

At 12/1/10 04:07 PM, K2LU wrote:
Well, whenever I'm feeling angry or depressed I tend to listen to more "angry" metal. But other than that, not really.

I guess you mean stuff like thrash and death metal? Same dude.


I love metal like crackheads love anal. and crack.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 19:30:09


At 12/1/10 12:16 PM, TheDaemonicPoet wrote: Shit, I'm listening to Agalloch, Pale Folklore album... shit is intense and beautiful.

Along with Ulver, I think Agalloch made some of the greatest Black/Folk Metal ever. From Which Of This Oak EP is another great release when it comes to Atmospheric Black/Folk Metal. Pale Folklore and Ashes Against The Grain are still my favorite albums by Agalloch. And some of my favorite albums in general.

Talking about Agalloch. I've been going through their new album all day long. Listenned though the whole almost three times already. While I think the record is a great add to Agalloch's discography, I still have to ask why the production is so bad compared to the production of The Mantle and Ashes Against The Grain. In fact, every single album by Agalloch was perfectly mixed, even their first Demo and EP. On the EP From Which Of This Oak, the sound is kind of dirty, but it adds a great "Cabin in the forest" ambiance to the music. But Marrow Of The Spirit's production is just weird. Through my first listenning of the track Into The Painted Grey, I stopped it and started Falling Snow, from Ashes Against The Grain. While the riffs from the two songs are not comparable, the production on Falling Snow was still way better than it was on Into The Painted Grey.

Second problem, is a problem I never had with any other Agalloch album before, I think some parts are just too long or don't have a significant progression in it, so they tend to get boring. However, this is only a problem for the last two tracks on the album. The four first tracks still hold a lenght of 49 minutes on the record, so I'm not going to complain on this anymore. Because these tracks are very good. The riffs on these songs are pretty cool, and the build up on Black Lake Niðstång is just intense. During the seventh minute of this song, Haughm starts screaming like he never did before on any Agalloch record. While it may sound weird for the first few seconds, it adds so much emotion to the song, it grew on me pretty fast, and I must say that this part is one of my favorites on the album.

Talking about Black Lake Niðstång, I must complain about another thing about this record. The song lenght. There is only 6 tracks on the album for a 1 hour and 5 minutes record. Not that I mind listenning to long tracks. In fact, I think Agalloch's music is better appreciated when the listenned from the first second of the album to the last one. However, I could see people who would like to listen to a specific track. The song Black Lake Niðstång could easily be splitted in three different parts. And why not? That is exactly what they did for She Painted Fire Across The Skyline and Our Fortress Is Burning. Those are splitted in parts. Why not do the same thing for this album?

Agalloch and Profound Lore Records have presented Marrow Of The Spirit as the heaviest, darkest and most agressive record by Agalloch, so far. Well, it's true. It's the heaviest, the darkest and most agressive record by Agalloch. On some of the songs like Into The Painted Grey, the drums goes in an intense blast beat right from the start, with a lot of distortion, the guitars just go crazy in a black metal-ish riff and the vocals are just as agressive. Songs like Ghosts Of The Midwinter Fires will still bring you back to the the Good ol' Agalloch we all know. Very progressive songs. Smooth and melodic, than more agressive and darker. So their may not be as much memorable songs on this record as on Ashes Against The Grain or Pale Folklore, which are to me, perfect albums, but there is still enough of that magic only Agalloch can create on Marrow Of The Spirit, for me to like it.

Most important about this record is that it's different. This is the most important part about Agalloch's music. Being able to diversify their still so much has brought them tho have four completely different full-lenght albums in their discography. While this is not my favorite album by them, it is still a great add to Agalloch's discography.

At 12/1/10 02:16 PM, ZpLiNtEh wrote:
At 12/1/10 01:04 PM, D3NTATUS wrote: black metal takes time to get into, you don't listen to black metal for the same reasons you listen to other music, necessarily.
Doesn't it matter what type of Black Metal you listen to though? I don't know much about it but I've seen the guys here discuss Depressive Black Metal and Symphonic Black Metal, and there's probably others.

Black Metal and SBM are two completely different genres to me. SBM shouldn't even have the word "Black" in the genre name.

SBM bands just do not play the same music that is played by other Black Metal bands. Listenning to both genres is the best I could suggest. You will understand the difference way easier if you go there by yourself.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 19:30:12


At 12/1/10 05:29 PM, MaraquanWocky wrote: I'm back. Be angry. Which brings me to:

Whoops sorry man didn't realise you'd posted.

Angry: Megadeth, Killswitch Engage, certain Metallica songs
Happy: Blue Oyster Cult, Queensryche, Corrosion of Conformity
Calm: Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin, any "original" heavy metal
Sad: Alice in Chains, Korn, Soundgarden, any alternative metal

Sounds good to me :D

It's weird how that happens.

Ha you should see my itunes library :P

At 12/1/10 05:46 PM, 6Imm6ortal6 wrote:
The only bands in that list I would even consider metal were Megadeth and Black Sabbath.
The rest are metalcore, grunge, or hard rock. Even Black Sabbath are debateable but I consider them the biggest influence to doom metal so metal enough for me.

Why does it matter :S

I usually let my mood choose what I listen to, but sometimes I just fall into a "phase for a few days to a week of certain genres. Like I might only listen to death metal for a week straight and than not listen to any death metal for a month, things like that.

Yea I've done that, mostly with metalcore, I'll go through a phase of listening to so much KSE, ATR and The Agonist then I just switch onto thrash.

Yea thrash is my favourite kind of metulz :3
I do find I can listen to Avant-Garde metal almost any time. Just fits my taste perfectly I suppose.

Fair enough, I'm like that with progressive metal :)

DOUBLE POST SOZZALOLOL

I love metal like crackheads love anal. and crack.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 20:36:44


I like how kvlt black metal shitbags always feel appealled by bands like Abigail Williams. It's like these fuckers really feel like that kind of Symphonic Black Metal/Metalcore bands are somewhat of a threat to them.

What the freakin' fuck ?!? I've read this fucker's review for Abigail Williams EP, named Legend. You can easily tell going through his shit list of reviews that he's another of these pathetic pricks that need to bash on core music to boost their own confidence.

Seriously... wtf? What kind of lamer actually waste his time bashing symphonic bm or core bands like this? The worst is that he gives them a 0%. Not that I feel insulted or anything. It's not like I need some kvlt dick to tell me what's good and what isn't. But I just hate people who give 0% to ANY album.

Why do you care reviewing music you plainly hate? IMO, reviews are for the people who enjoy the band. Only useful reviews with low scores are those written by fans of the band who think the album is not good. It's like asking a Death Metal fan to write a review to the newest Blind Guardian album. How could it possibly relevant?

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 20:47:34


At 12/1/10 08:36 PM, HeavenDuff wrote:
Seriously... wtf? What kind of lamer actually waste his time bashing symphonic bm or core bands like this? The worst is that he gives them a 0%. Not that I feel insulted or anything. It's not like I need some kvlt dick to tell me what's good and what isn't. But I just hate people who give 0% to ANY album.

Agreed, they must have some kind of mind set where they think giving an album a bad review will make them disappear, or stop people from listening to the band.
No album is so bad it should get a 0%. The fact they put the effort into writing music and making an album has to be worth something. At least in my opinion.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 21:09:46


At 12/1/10 08:47 PM, 6Imm6ortal6 wrote:
At 12/1/10 08:36 PM, HeavenDuff wrote:
Seriously... wtf? What kind of lamer actually waste his time bashing symphonic bm or core bands like this? The worst is that he gives them a 0%. Not that I feel insulted or anything. It's not like I need some kvlt dick to tell me what's good and what isn't. But I just hate people who give 0% to ANY album.
Agreed, they must have some kind of mind set where they think giving an album a bad review will make them disappear, or stop people from listening to the band.
No album is so bad it should get a 0%. The fact they put the effort into writing music and making an album has to be worth something. At least in my opinion.

If you can sit through the whole album enough times to really understand the music. Know the riffs, progressions and structures well enough that you can describe them. How could you possibly give the album a 0%? If it was that terrible, you simply wouldn't be able to listen to the whole thing, even once. There as to be some kind of quality on the album. Even the bands I hate the most, would get some point from me. You can't be a 100% horrible.

I'm pretty sure the guy didn't even listen to the whole thing, even once. I'd bet 20 fuckin' bucks on this. And MA still allow these reviews on the website. It's an obvious fact that the guy didn't listen to the album...

Most important of all is that this will drop the average score of the review. So if there was two reviews of the album. One at 75 and the other at 65... Instead of having a 70% average score, you now have an average score of 46%... That is soooo representative of the opinions on the album.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 23:17:47


At 12/1/10 08:36 PM, HeavenDuff wrote: What the freakin' fuck ?!? WHINGE WHINGE WHINGE

I actually like that guys reviews on shitty metalcore bands:

"Is it a gimmick, or a political statement, or both?! The answer: It doesn't matter, the music still fucking blows and still sounds like what Dark Tranquility would sound like if all the band members cut off their right hands and played drunk."

You have to give it up for Oscar Wilde word-play that good.

At 12/1/10 09:09 PM, HeavenDuff wrote: It's an obvious fact that the guy didn't listen to the album...

No, it isn't you fucking little turd. It's an obvious fact you should of been aborted. \m/

I should post something metal.

Metal Hell


Metal Hell.

Pill pop a dope a well run general hash pump a gonna led.

BBS Signature

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-01 23:24:35


At 12/1/10 11:17 PM, PenisClown wrote: "Is it a gimmick, or a political statement, or both?! The answer: It doesn't matter, the music still fucking blows and still sounds like what Dark Tranquility would sound like if all the band members cut off their right hands and played drunk."

You obviously don't understand the fucking matter. So just shut your fucking crack smoking dirty mouth before your father stick is dick in there.

Why do you fucking read reviews? To know if the album is good right? But if a Britney Spears fan was to judge the newest album of your beloved Solefald, would you care about the result? I think not. Now do you fucking understand? I've seen 2nd graders with more brains than you.

At 12/1/10 09:09 PM, HeavenDuff wrote: It's an obvious fact that the guy didn't listen to the album...
No, it isn't you fucking little turd. It's an obvious fact you should of been aborted. \m/

Your parents actually tried to abort you, making you the r-tard you are now.
No, but seriously, I've rarely seen such a crude and useless piece of stupid ass post. The Metal Hell could be a cool place, thanks to you, it's not :)

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-02 01:13:11


At 12/2/10 12:59 AM, Xarnor wrote: I think it's pointless to read reviews on music, unless you're planning on buying an album and you can't preview the music. Reviews are mostly composed of the writer's opinion, and others opinions are always gonna be different, so unless you can somehow gain or learn something from reading reviews, I don't see any point.

I think reviews can be helpful if you can't preview the music or just don't wanna listen and waste your time. It's nice to ask around here whether or not a new album is worth picking up and spending the 15 bucks or whatever for those who buy their music.
I think it really depends on the source, some random review on Metal Archives may not be as helpful as asking as Metal Hell member since we already know what music they like and who is gonna give a more biased review.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-02 01:16:19


Reading reviews is pretty cool cause you can get different point of views on the same album. Plus, it's also pretty awesome when you can't decide which album you should pick up first by a band with a huge discography.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-02 07:26:13


At 12/1/10 11:24 PM, HeavenDuff wrote: The Metal Hell could be a cool place, thanks to you, it's not :)

You breakin' my heart Duff :'(

At 12/1/10 11:24 PM, HeavenDuff wrote: your beloved Solefald

Lol


Metal Hell.

Pill pop a dope a well run general hash pump a gonna led.

BBS Signature

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-02 08:06:35


What's the big deal with GoatDoomOcculta's review of a metalcore EP? He described the EP perfectly, and his review was very well written.

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-02 10:57:12


The merits of Deathcore.

Personally, bands like black dahlia murder I think are fucking badass,
this guyapparently disagrees.
He prefers bands like Ontogeny


Fucking crazy, and proud.

Your god is a fraud!

BBS Signature

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-02 11:42:21


At 12/1/10 12:28 AM, PenisClown wrote: IS THE NEW SOLEFALD AWESOME SENSEY?

I think it is. They have a chick doing guest vocals who reminds me of Julie Christmas. kinda weird sounding, but cool. Anyway, it's a very good album. I'll be listening to this many times, I'm sure, just like all their other albums that aren't the Linear Scaffold (that one I just listen to occasionally). I still haven't listened to the new Agalloch. Static Tensions by Kylesa was pretty cool. There's other stoner/sludge stuff that's better, though.

At 12/1/10 01:08 AM, K2LU wrote: Haven't heard of that many Norwegian metal bands to be honest. I've heard of Kvelertak, Enslaved, Purified In Blood and Keep Of Kalessin.

What I really like about your country's metal scene is the experimental/avant-garde and post-black metal stuff.

At 12/1/10 05:46 PM, 6Imm6ortal6 wrote:
At 12/1/10 05:29 PM, MaraquanWocky wrote: I'm back. Be angry. Which brings me to:

Angry: Megadeth, Killswitch Engage, certain Metallica songs
Happy: Blue Oyster Cult, Queensryche, Corrosion of Conformity
Calm: Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin, any "original" heavy metal
Sad: Alice in Chains, Korn, Soundgarden, any alternative metal
The only bands in that list I would even consider metal were Megadeth and Black Sabbath.

and Queensryche and Corrosion of Conformity. Alice in Chains is borderline.


sig by JaY11

Letterboxd

one of the four horsemen of the Metal Hell

BBS Signature

Response to Metal Hell 2010-12-02 11:43:32


There are too few women in metal. Why is that?
Can anybody recommend me some bands with female band members?