At 12/22/09 11:22 AM, Nev wrote:
But some people are just UGLY.
To you.
Not really.
I do not like how thug guys dresses. But they can be attractive to some people.
But if you meet a 800 lbs guy, that he has so much acne that you can't see what it's skin color, that he has a potato sized nose and that both eyes just aren't looking the same way... than he his ugly.
You may say it's not true, but I think there is a limit to what is and what isn't subjective. At some point... you can say that objectivly... someone is just ugly...
I think the same rule applies to arts. If not... than everything can automaticaly be art. Kids could say that they punched each others face because they thought that bleeding noses and bruises were artistic.
Then again, that's the point I was bringing earlier: "Why have definitions for words, if any and everything can be considered to fit in the description?"
At 12/22/09 01:22 PM, D3NTATUS wrote:
At 12/22/09 11:11 AM, HeavenDuff wrote:
I'm not the kind of douche who believes that all is decided by individuals.
Not all is decided by the individuals, only subjective terms. I don't get why you don't understand this.
Because almost everything could become subjective. And who decided what are subjective terms?
Also, I didn't say that there was nothing subjective, but that there was a limit to how far you can push subjectivity.
Explainning why I won't waste my time answering the rest of the post.
I never said there was nothing subjective. And what I said about seing your opinions as facts was directed mainly to Ponos during a discussion we had about Abigail Williams. He was saying this band was pure shit. But there is no way that a band like this one can be pure shit because they have artistic value.
What you guys really can't seem to understand is that at first my point was that there is greater music and that there is entertaining music. I'm not the only one saying this. I've read books and had discussions with other people who see things like this. In no way should you say that Mozart and 50 Cent are on the same level. And I also wouldn't consider most of my favorite bands to be on Mozart's level. Only a few bands I like are Outstanding artists. And that really isn't just opinion...
Because even though I consider Mozart to be a greater artist than most of the bands I like, I still listen to more of these bands then Mozart.
Still I can see the difference between entertaining, decent or good music and OUTSTANDING music.
I'm not being an hypocrite. If you want to fully understand my point you could at least ask questions on my views or whatever before judging that I am close-minded.
At 12/22/09 02:07 PM, D3NTATUS wrote:
At 12/22/09 01:40 PM, Nev wrote:
I don't think everyone is beautiful. I've seen pics of people who are horribly ugly. But thats not to say there isn't someone in the world with a fetish for that kind of thing :P.
I knew that's what you were thinking. What you meant really is that even if the person is ugly, someone can still have a kind of fetish for that kind of people.
But could that person be wrong? Could he be wrong saying that this person is attractive?
You know that some people may like eating back their puke after mixing it with shit. But does that make puke and shit good food? I don't think so.
But maybe you like asparagus and I don't. This is what I see as subjective.
I know you guys may see me as an hypocrite... but you will realise that I never bash on someone else's taste unless I really think there is no artistic value in their stuff. But you guys talk about Behemoth and Slayer all the time and I dislike both of these bands...
Still I can't see my own tastes in music as "THE ONLY GOOD TASTES" so I will admit that there can be an artistic value in Behemoth's work.
Hahaha I didn't mean that I think everyone is beautiful, just that I can see how people would be able to find beauty in the person, or at least look past it.
"or at least look past it."
Yes, of course you can do that. But I'm not talking about being friend with an ugly person. But really finding that person to be attractive.
I know this may sound weird, but there is no contradiction in my theory. If you still don't get it... then PM me... or whatever... you don't have to... but I'm still a 100% sure that there isn't any kind of contradiction in my theory.