At 12/18/07 05:00 PM, X-Imperium-X wrote:
I also just kind of noticed that the childish habbit of giving crappy bands crappy names still hasn't died down yet, and wanted to respond to it.
You call it childish, I call it beating a dead horse. I was being tongue-in-cheek and I guess you missed it. Frankly, the names I used are very, very played out, but I always accept new ones if they're funny. And they pop up.
yeah, I missed it. I just really dislike things like that, whether it's serious or not.
(you know, I might just not be tr00 enough...)
I don't listen to "troo" stuff often, in fact barely. I resent the culture some times because of the obsession with being more and more underground, however:
oh, exactly my thoughts. I listen to pretty much anything, but I dislike the whole idea of somebody being 'real' and someone else not. If it's good music, you shouldn't care about what an artist does. or at least I don't stop listening to the music because of it... otherwise I could just as well stop listening to burzum etc.
Lifelover
lawls at the band pic. These guys are serious. It may be an undercut to make fun of a band's image, but it was funny regardless. I personally don't listen to them.
yeah, it looks silly. But just about the whole underground black metal scene&related is rather fucked up, so I gladly forgive them their silly pictures (also, the cover of their first cd is hot... or would be, if it werenth for the pigs blood:p)
Herfst
Never heard of them, but they are independent and without an LP. Troo kvlt indeed, well-played.
Leng Tch'e
Were good, going downhill IMO
yeah, I understand. I like marasmus, but it's far from being razorgrind.
Nanowar
if its Manowar and you typo'd, then they are classic, even though I don't like them that much. I googled it just in case (I've been surprised before by one-letter-off band names) and apparently a Nanowar parody thing exists. If its them, IDK...
yeah, it's them. It's not really that great musically, but they are hilarious. it's like most other joke bands, actually.
kind off a shame metal archives doesn't allow them.
oh, and mate... don't think I don't know half the bands here. I'm would be the first one to admit my knowledge isn't that great, but you're not exactly talking about underground here.;)
I know that. This isn't the Metal Archives board or even something worse than that. But your attitude leaves something to be desired. Its a little condescending, because this thread wasn't going to be and isn't going to be anything but what it is not. Its how I remember it when I was a newfag, just in reverse. Pertinent discussion is always welcome, but if you want more serious conversation, hit up another board. Not that I'm trying to push you out or anything, but what you see is what you get.
I'll admit that this isn't the best place for serious discussions, but that's also not really why I'm here. I do visit other forums that can be used for that. However, that doesn't take away I still got the impression that a club called "metal hell" should focus on metal, en not on what's not metal. That's pretty much anything I can complain about, half the posts being about masscore or screamo...