Poor re-viewers
I can't believe how many people don't like this game just because its too hard for them. Granted I think this game is difficult too but I'm not going to complain about that.
This one is very similar to the first one except for the specific virus traits, which where fun to pick.
I liked both games, the frist one little more because it was easier. But I also like a challenge.
Great game! Keep them coming.
Awsome game
I was Pissed off at first becuse I didnt know what to do, but I read all the reviews and one told me how to win. Its not that hard if you know how.
It's hard to top Pandemic
It really is. Pandemic is an amazingly well done game that requires thinking, strategy, and is really a lot of fun.
This game falls incredibly short of the amazing experience that Pandemic is. Honestly, this game doesn't even deserve the name Pandemic attached to it.
The art has taken a huge hit, the controls have been dumbed down, and there's really no strategy -- it's all luck!
I do like some of the things you tried to put in, but honestly it looks like you gave this game minimal effort. It's just disappointing and we know you can do so much better.
Abit confusing
The game is an ok time-killer, although - I didn't understand why countries would immunize themselves against a disease that they probably wouldn't even be affected by.
Much Improved
This is much better than the original. The original was just about buffing a virus and waiting. This one actually has strategy and I've won this 5 or 6 times over, so yes it is possible to win.
The only thing I really haven't found a use for is infecting the water supply. I tried it the first couple of games, but haven't used it since.
In the third one, I'd make it so that you are some sort of nefarious organization spreading the virus rather than being the virus. Like a 12 Monkeys scenario. That would make for more involving gameplay. It's hard to relate to being a virus, but psychotic mad scientist? Sure!