Reviews for Four Second Frenzy

[Nostros]

A poor copy of WarioWare.

While the consept was good, The controls where monsterous. Most of the buttons made them move either too fast or too slow, and there was no instruction on how the games are played. All you see is a quick blur of a instruction, then some arrows, with no time to ajust from the last game. You need too go back and take a look at the warioware you got this from, and take a clue from some of there Microgames. But, with some simple ajustments, this has potential to be the most addicting game on Newgrounds. Which is still Marvin Spectrum. xB

[Cmmh40]

Here's why I gave it the ratings I did

Graphis were ok, but not perfect. Style? Cmon those borders were pretty lame. I had it muted, so no sound rating. Almost no violence except lame fire. A 2 because the Earth was destroyed which rocks. None for interactivity because I have no idea what you mean by that. 1 for humor cause I burned a teddy bear, but that was the only thing I found slightly awesome. Overall: 4. Basically, a Simon Cowl: " Completely awful". But a Paula Abdul: You could have done better ( she didn't like the burning teddy bear).

[HomerDough]

Great

<Good Points>
Lots of games, good graphics, good sound, fun gameplay

<Improvement>
Some more violence and humor

<Comments>
That game was fun as hell

5/5 homer8722
Review Request Club

[vkomi]

nice

nice minigames but a few of them need some more explanations

[cowmo]

hm.

a strange attempt at an online wario ware type game.
i thought it was pretty cool.