00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

Snowycity just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews

2,534,897 Views | 44,792 Replies
New Topic

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-01 18:05:57



NG Review Moderator // Pm me for Review Abuse

BBS Signature

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-01 20:04:25


|_075 0|= |_337 4|3(_)51\/3 |23\/13\\/\\/5 |_0|_. |_00|< 7|-||20(_)9|-| 4|_|_ 7|-|3 |O4935! 4 |_07 0|= 7|-|3//\//\ 4|23 1|\| |_337! |20|=|_.

Haha. Sorry, I couldn't resist. What I said was:

'Lots of leet abusive reviews here LOL. Look through all the pages! A lot of them are in leet LOL! ROFL.'

Really, a lot of reviews, including abusive ones, have been written in leet, but the thing in that game to translate 1337 to english wasn't finished, so it is hard to tell who wrote what...

What do we do? The reviews are in 1337, but we can't really tell what is written...

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-01 22:43:38


Lol, Check out the reviews this guy left!

Knott-Yeti

Check both pages, its quite funny really!


Do you have 2,500+ b/p points? Are you looking for an intelligent club where you can discuss NG related and unrelated topics? Join the Elite Guard Barracks!

BBS Signature

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-02 11:14:43


Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-02 15:45:50


The review in question is written by hippy123. He writes a negative review without a clue what he is talking about and without really giving constructive advice. I am honestly not sure whether or not it is abusive, so decide for yourself.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=348214

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-02 19:03:35


Hmm...

AYB

You see that review with nearly every swear word in it? Why do people even bother to post those kind of reviews...

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-02 20:12:49


/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=1477659

All caps'erzer


This signature is not true

BBS Signature

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-02 20:23:54


At 3/2/07 08:12 PM, Jarvid wrote:

Oops, looks like you made a bit of a mistake, here is the link you wanted to display.

All caps'erzer

But all caps are no longer considered abusive if they are positive.


Do you have 2,500+ b/p points? Are you looking for an intelligent club where you can discuss NG related and unrelated topics? Join the Elite Guard Barracks!

BBS Signature

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-02 21:45:04


There are about 3 abusive reviews here:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/366641


Sig provided by HellboundNinja

BBS Signature

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 04:22:13


Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 10:34:23



asdf

BBS Signature

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 12:57:01



BBS Signature

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 16:00:42


Can an answer from the author be flagged like a "go fuck yourself" reply to a constructive but low rated review ?

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 16:45:36


At 3/3/07 04:00 PM, Pieriku wrote: Can an answer from the author be flagged like a "go fuck yourself" reply to a constructive but low rated review ?

no if you flag for that you are flagging the review, and if the review isn't abusive you lose points. only flag if the review is abusive not the author.

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 17:14:21


A few here Basically All of this guy's
I guess that will do for now.


It serves its purpose.

BBS Signature

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 17:16:22


BTW

A few here
and
Basically All of this guy's

are two different links.


It serves its purpose.

BBS Signature

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 17:18:01


At 3/3/07 05:16 PM, rockymike wrote: BTW

A few here
and
Basically All of this guy's

are two different links.

Yeah we knew. Back in the day I used to post 50 different links with each word being a different link. Good fun!


Do you have 2,500+ b/p points? Are you looking for an intelligent club where you can discuss NG related and unrelated topics? Join the Elite Guard Barracks!

BBS Signature

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 17:19:35


At 3/3/07 04:45 PM, LittleWashu wrote:
At 3/3/07 04:00 PM, Pieriku wrote: Can an answer from the author be flagged like a "go fuck yourself" reply to a constructive but low rated review ?
no if you flag for that you are flagging the review, and if the review isn't abusive you lose points. only flag if the review is abusive not the author.

So, there is no way to blam somebody who spends his time insulting everybody in his replies to reviews ?

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 17:43:08


At 3/3/07 05:19 PM, Pieriku wrote:
At 3/3/07 04:45 PM, LittleWashu wrote:
At 3/3/07 04:00 PM, Pieriku wrote: Can an answer from the author be flagged like a "go fuck yourself" reply to a constructive but low rated review ?
no if you flag for that you are flagging the review, and if the review isn't abusive you lose points. only flag if the review is abusive not the author.
So, there is no way to blam somebody who spends his time insulting everybody in his replies to reviews ?

Not right now anyways. In the new layout there might be a way to do that. But the main reason this right was given out to the author's was so they could get the last word. When this was given out there was no whistle system and there were a lot of asshole reviewers back then.

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 17:46:52



Skype: the_sleuth

BBS Signature

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 18:06:51


At 3/3/07 05:43 PM, LittleWashu wrote:
Not right now anyways. In the new layout there might be a way to do that. But the main reason this right was given out to the author's was so they could get the last word. When this was given out there was no whistle system and there were a lot of asshole reviewers back then.

Geez, I hate the authors that make really annoying responses. Sometimes they just take huge long lines of text, or paragraphs from random stuff on wikipedia in their responses. Really fucks up the page. Hope we can get rid of that in the new layout.


SON OF BITCH AMERICAN

AMERICAN IS PIG

DO YOU WANT A HAMBURGER? DO YOU WANT A PIZZA?

BBS Signature

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 20:37:44


*****ALERT*****

Newgrounds is being raided. Any of these users are spammers:

1.dontaskmewhoiam
2.immachargin
3.thislooksshooped

Not sure if you knew this already, but just in case...!

It is best to stay away from the general forum for a while. Any vagrant user with a idiotic name is a spammer.

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 21:19:15


I'm actually panicking right now because of the raid....I can't stop shaking....

Here are some ARs (Abusive Reviews)

Art of War DX

Sorry about that post above this one by me. I just wanted to warn anyone who didn't know yet.

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 21:35:52


At 3/3/07 08:37 PM, K-Fox wrote:
Newgrounds is being raided. Any of these users are spammers:

1.dontaskmewhoiam

Whoops! Wrong person! pedobear1 is a spammer, not dontaskmewhoiam.

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-03 22:53:43



Do you have 2,500+ b/p points? Are you looking for an intelligent club where you can discuss NG related and unrelated topics? Join the Elite Guard Barracks!

BBS Signature

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-04 09:04:38



Archer I'm a good shot!

Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-04 09:55:05


Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-04 12:53:29


Response to Rage's gift to you: Abusive reviews 2007-03-04 15:00:15


At 3/4/07 02:42 PM, Zen-Zinxe wrote: Correction, ImARetarted. 3rd one down.

I see it.

Now lets see what we have here...