At 8/17/03 02:24 PM, TheJoe324 wrote: Here's a real winner... Yeah.. he has abusive reviews on pa- well, pretty much everywhere.

Oh boy, you'd think after so many abusive reviews, he'd come up with something original instead of, well, random gay comments and profanity. To quote, 2/64 found his most recent review useful. That must be a record. Hope he enjoys his account while it lasts :-)

At 8/17/03 12:15 PM, Sekky wrote: Lots Of Lovely Links

I'll update that sometime this week.

Yea I think thats wise the first 3 abusive need to go but thats a good start to a website you got going there....

Thanks to this topic I finally got myself a lil bit of a whistle level.

Here are 3 bad ones....
Outwar
Outwar
Abusive
Both the outwar ones are by a user called "thethethe" however when I try and search his profile or any BBS posts by him I get no matches can anyone get me his profile?
Thank you

At 8/18/03 06:27 AM, the_phantom_spancker wrote: Both the outwar ones are by a user called "thethethe" however when I try and search his profile or any BBS posts by him I get no matches can anyone get me his profile?
Thank you

me be he didn't make a profile a lot of spammer don't make one

Here is one i found.........Abusive

I mostly don't get to somthing thats abusive... most whistles I blow are on stolen games and look! you guys have found tons of abusive reviews! how do u find all these?

Btw, is there any point in marking a review as helpful?

At 8/18/03 11:36 AM, eviLudy wrote: I mostly don't get to somthing thats abusive... most whistles I blow are on stolen games and look! you guys have found tons of abusive reviews! how do u find all these?

The ones I post are mostly from links from other people's posts (on this thread). I just go through all the pages of reviews for whatever flash they link to, and I look through profiles by abusive reviewers, or look at other flashes by the same author, etc. If I see there're a lot of abusive reviews with no marks (0/0), I post the link.
Not sure where other people get theirs though.

This guy has some abusives

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=585078

At 8/18/03 01:52 PM, GuineVir wrote: Btw, is there any point in marking a review as helpful?

well i guess it can work like 1 abusive -1 help full = 0 abusive or some thing like that but other than that i can't think of a good point

It would be great if you had to be level 9+ to be able to make reviews. Even though there are some people with low levels that want to review, it would stop all the idiots that sign up just to annoy people, sign up with a second account because they are banned, or whatever. How many outwar spammers do you think would actually WAIT over a month just to spam their link? And just to get in about 10 reviews before they're banned.

yothe made his account at 2:33, his first outwar spam review at 2:36, and was banned at 2:38. If he had to wait to get to level 9 to spam, he never would have done it.

I haven't been in NG for quite a while.
I'm surprised this topic is still alive.
That being said...
I'm still TEH SILVER. :-o
< amazed >

Hey Alex where you been?
Remember me?

At 8/18/03 05:59 AM, Sekky wrote:

At 8/17/03 02:24 PM, TheJoe324 wrote: Here's a real winner... Yeah.. he has abusive reviews on pa- well, pretty much everywhere.

hahahaha, he said 'I hope this gets blammed' or words to that effect, referring to Disorderly Segaway.

That's funny.

No kidding. With all the crazy idiots who review flashes that are over a year old with "YEAH, LET'S BLAM THIS SHIT" or somesuch... it's very surprising to me that NO ONE ever seems to come on the BBS and ask "I KEEP VOTING 0 ON THIS MOVIE EVERY DAY, AND IT WON'T GET BLAMMED!!! SOMEONE TELL ME WHY I CANT BLAM IT!@>!@?!@?!"

But I'm also thankful, so... just curious. #;-}>

At 8/18/03 01:52 PM, GuineVir wrote: Btw, is there any point in marking a review as helpful?

Sure there is. A) it helps protect reviews that you think are being unfairly targeted with either unhelpful or abusive marks (since you can't tell the difference).

For example, if you see a review you think is somewhat helpful, but people have marked it 0/2 for some pointless reason, you can quickly mark it helpful to at least make it 1/3.

And more generally, B) it shows appreciation for good reviews. I have tons and tons of helpful review marks, and I'm very happy that people took the time to mark them such, whether it was the authors or other readers.

At 8/19/03 12:06 AM, gfoxcook wrote: A) it helps protect reviews that you think are being unfairly targeted with either unhelpful or abusive marks (since you can't tell the difference).

Drag Racer (1 and 2)

I see many people marking the long spam-like reviews abusive/not helpful, even though they are just the save code used in the game and people want to share the car they made. Thats where I usually vote helpful. People see it, assume its spam, and mark it.

At 8/19/03 12:13 AM, TheJoe324 wrote:

At 8/19/03 12:06 AM, gfoxcook wrote: A) it helps protect reviews that you think are being unfairly targeted with either unhelpful or abusive marks (since you can't tell the difference).

Drag Racer (1 and 2)

I see many people marking the long spam-like reviews abusive/not helpful, even though they are just the save code used in the game and people want to share the car they made. Thats where I usually vote helpful. People see it, assume its spam, and mark it.

Yeah, I actually did that once.
Saw the junk text --> abusive
Then when I scrolled down, and saw MORE junk text, then I suddenly realised what I did.
Then I felt reeeally bad...

http://www.newgrounds.com/port...&page=1&user_id=429964

I don't see what the FUCK would make anyone write a review like this.. That movie has gotten so many bad reviews for no reason at all. Some of these reviews are worse than ones I've seen on movies that DESERVED them, like ones showing pictures/movies of dead people or people dying, racist movies, and crap like that. But I don't see what in this movie makes people write reviews like this.

At 8/19/03 07:40 AM, Sekky wrote: Is anybody actually going to look at what I did?

i did but why would we ever whant too view random reviews??

At 8/19/03 07:58 AM, Sekky wrote: Why is it if it's HTML it's useful but when it's in Flash it isn't? It's an extremely sophisticated script.

Nice little webpage you got going there. Makes marking reviews a lot easier.

At 8/19/03 08:47 AM, Sekky wrote: The HTML one or the Flash one?

The Flash one. It's pretty smart.

At 8/18/03 06:26 PM, the_phantom_spancker wrote: Hey Alex where you been?

OMFG. It's teh spancker !!!
Nice to see you again ol' compulsive postah !
Sorry if I respond a bit ... later. But I'm kind of turning like you a few months ago: " no more NG ", only deposit regularly.
I've recently been away for the holidays. But I'm BACK.

Remember me?

Who wouldn't ? :-)

Lock and load ladies and gentlemen, the same retarded Outwar spammer that showed up in the reviews of all the highly rated movies (with a random geocities site) is back. Just look for the guy claiming he's stolen the entire top 50 or something.

Awww You guys are just too nice...

Now my whistle level is even higher!

Now they have [BANNED] next to the name of the reviewer when they are banned. Hopefully that will stop people from saying "BAN THAT GUY!!" hours after they already have been.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=601589 Hmm... I don't know wtf http://www.kkthxbye.com is, but apparently its another spam-link type game. I checked reviews like.. 5 seconds after this guy made his first review. I hope this type of spam doesn't happen often.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=557824

A lot of his reviews are abusive and retarded, the rest are just unhelpful. Unsurprisingly, he lists himself as "13, Flash Designer"

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=589060

A couple of abusive reviews, and a lot of nonsense reviews.

At 8/23/03 03:51 PM, jonthomson wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.php3?user_id=557824

A lot of his reviews are abusive and retarded, the rest are just unhelpful. Unsurprisingly, he lists himself as "13, Flash Designer"

A real 13 year old prick. I like these. Those ppl make me outstanding. Muhahahah! =)

Drewdance is special. His batting average is 1.13.
He reviews a lot of shit, but with only abusive comments (blammed submissions).

Thanx for teh help, jonthomson!

Hahaha. There are still these kind of morons here in NG ?
I thought we had eradicated them and they were extinct !
Guess I wuz wrong !