here's some morexX0ur3N,samuraijubei,

At 4/19/08 04:06 PM, Felipe wrote: to kid lazarus read his second post he quoted the wrong post because he's fucking stupid and sucks at doing shit properly.

What's your problem? I took a few minutes to type up one post and you say I "suck at doing shit properly"? Go back to school and learn some basic grammar.

More abuse:
This submission is suspect. I have pop-up blocker so I can't be sure if it really links to a different site.
Only one here.
No so sure on the first.
Same idiot asking "what is this?"

54thavalance - Tells the author he sucks.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 5746 Is this against the rules?, and i noticed that this is the same guy who has sent me two pms recently about making money online help!.

At 4/19/08 04:43 PM, Kidlazarus wrote:

At 4/19/08 04:06 PM, Felipe wrote: to kid lazarus read his second post he quoted the wrong post because he's fucking stupid and sucks at doing shit properly.

What's your problem? I took a few minutes to type up one post and you say I "suck at doing shit properly"? Go back to school and learn some basic grammar.

I believe he was referring to my post earlier. I replied to the wrong one by mistake. Either way Felipe has sand in his vagina.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /289462/41/score check back to about page 25 godmine enjoy

At 4/19/08 07:01 PM, phantomlassuk wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /289462/41/score check back to about page 25 godmine enjoy

Holy "Shit". There were so many in that!

At 4/19/08 07:01 PM, phantomlassuk wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /289462/41/score check back to about page 25 godmine enjoy

that wan't a spam submission was it, if so i just dug myself into a permanent hole. hopefully it wasn't

At 4/19/08 07:39 PM, DBlach wrote:

At 4/19/08 07:01 PM, phantomlassuk wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /289462/41/score check back to about page 25 godmine enjoy

that wan't a spam submission was it, if so i just dug myself into a permanent hole. hopefully it wasn't

No and i really sorry if it was but i dont think it was, and any way if you read the message Malachy left. Its about the reviews you wont lose any points, but you wont gain any either.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /432950/13/score check back to page 7

wow ther must have been 30 there thanx

At 4/19/08 07:42 PM, phantomlassuk wrote:

At 4/19/08 07:39 PM, DBlach wrote:

At 4/19/08 07:01 PM, phantomlassuk wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /289462/41/score check back to about page 25 godmine enjoy

that wan't a spam submission was it, if so i just dug myself into a permanent hole. hopefully it wasn't

No and i really sorry if it was but i dont think it was, and any way if you read the message Malachy left. Its about the reviews you wont lose any points, but you wont gain any either.

so they got rid of that new rule? It still sucks, they should change everyone's whistle who went to garbage because of it.

At 4/19/08 07:01 PM, phantomlassuk wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /289462/41/score check back to about page 25 godmine enjoy

Flag the review on that page that he linked to by lilderrel. It says blam.

The one that says "Retarded"

It was never a rule. It was bob venting. If it were a new rule, somebody higher up would have said something on the forums, and not in a userpage. If you are being an idiot and just flagging every review in a spam submission, you probably will get a broken whistle, and good riddance for that.

Now, please, if you have questions just PM a review mod, PM bob for gods' sake, but don't clutter this topic with your complains/remarks/etc. Instead, why not go find some REAL abusive reviews not in spam flash.

And seriously, if you fucks keep bitching about the whistle system, you'll probably make it so that nobody has whistles, or any sort of visible stat to prove anything. It's happened with different stats before like popularity and author's letter grade thingys. So, if you are only here for some dumbass stat. just close the window and go the fuck outside and find something constructive to do.

At 4/19/08 04:01 PM, BR wrote:

Hmm, from what I gathered.. when Bob mentioned "So anyone jumping on the bandwagon and flagging comments that are accurate in pointing the finger at spam groups, they're going to get a surprise in the form of a garbage whistle." This to me was making a distinction between Highly abusive reviews vs. reviews that reveal the truth about their spamming nature.

Since it could be seen as abusive i.e. "STOP submitting these Shit!!", or "Why do you submit these!?" but pertains to their identity as a spamming group, AND can actually be agreed upon by many users (unlike standard submissions). But then again, everybody has their own judgement on this, and I certainly don't see Bob's statement as a new rule.

That's about as well put as one can get it, NEVR. now stop bitching and start linkin' ^_^

At 4/19/08 03:31 PM, FodeyOz wrote: I know my whistle staus changed from these two reviews alone because I hadn't flagged anything else until I knew that those reviews were deleted. Doesn't that kind of contradict what you're saying?

Unless you mean that you didn't flag any other review ever in the entire time you've had an account and that your whistle was prestine and never touched, I highly doubt that 2 review flags would have dropped you an entire level.

you probably flagged something before which wasn't dealt with until later, and you probably flagged a number of things to go from normal to garbage.

At 4/19/08 02:43 PM, Spartan204 wrote: GOD DAMMIT!!! I do every single one you guys tell me to and even omit a few of the risky ones to stay on the safe side, yet I still went to garbage whistle status!!! WHAT THE FUCK!?!

probably because you dug yourself a nice fat hole. You lose much more whistle points if you are wrong than you would get if you were right.

you also continue to get negative points even after you get to broken/garbage status, so you can dig yourself into oblivion if you really wanted.

wth?
how has my review abusive?
>:C

At 4/19/08 09:38 PM, Malachy wrote: That's about as well put as one can get it, NEVR. now stop bitching and start linkin' ^_^

LOL, I don't really think asking for a clarification qualifies as bitching. Tell the whiney kids who actually are bitching to shut up, rather than the guy who's just trying to get something cleared up. ;)

Nobody has said anything about tigerkitty's post, though. I'm guessing I'm just going to have to disregard that as the mindless drunken ramblings of a crazed review mod, then. Oh well. To be honest, I don't even know why I bothered to get my head around this - it's not like I flag on a regular basis, like some of the guys who cling to this thread like leeches. LEECHES!

Anyway, I'm done irritating Malachy by questioning the system. Let's hope that the rest of you guys don't wear down his patience enough to force him to erupt into the raging, ever-swearing review mod monster again. It's not a good look.

At 4/19/08 09:58 PM, NEVR wrote:

At 4/19/08 09:38 PM, Malachy wrote: That's about as well put as one can get it, NEVR. now stop bitching and start linkin' ^_^

LOL, I don't really think asking for a clarification qualifies as bitching. Tell the whiney kids who actually are bitching to shut up, rather than the guy who's just trying to get something cleared up. ;)

I wasn't talking to you about bitching per se, I was speaking to everyone having conniption fits, and since you asked a question regarding the system, BR's post answered it. I meant to hit "italic" not "bold".

Nobody has said anything about tigerkitty's post, though. I'm guessing I'm just going to have to disregard that as the mindless drunken ramblings of a crazed review mod, then. Oh well. To be honest, I don't even know why I bothered to get my head around this - it's not like I flag on a regular basis, like some of the guys who cling to this thread like leeches. LEECHES!

so if you don't flag much, and you don't cling to this thread or contribute to it, would you agree that you are simply in here posting for a +1 on your post count?

Anyway, I'm done irritating Malachy by questioning the system. Let's hope that the rest of you guys don't wear down his patience enough to force him to erupt into the raging, ever-swearing review mod monster again. It's not a good look.

oh, I'm always swearing. that's how I speak to children. and my patience is fine. I make the big bold things because I figure if I do it every few pages, some people may actually stop spouting the nontruths.

At 4/19/08 10:03 PM, Malachy wrote: so if you don't flag much, and you don't cling to this thread or contribute to it, would you agree that you are simply in here posting for a +1 on your post count?

Actually I have answered one or two questions that people have asked in here over the past couple of pages, but then perhaps smaller contributions aren't good enough for you, the big man with the golden aura? I normally only post in here to ask a question, or to answer a question posed at me, like you've just done. Seriously man, just because I don't post links for all the whistle whores in here, doesn't make me a +1 poster. Go talk to any of the Wi/Ht? regulars who are familiar with me and they'll back me up on that one, I can assure you. I'm just trying to help out, and WAS trying to clear something up for myself, but apparently this has to stay a solely "post links or GTFO" thread.

Aside from all that, if I wanted to +1 post, I could do it in the General forums with much less effort, like many other people do. The fact that you actually accuse someone who puts effort into their posts of being a +1 poster is fairly laughable, especially when said person spends a lot of time (far more than you do, at any rate) helping people out on these forums, if not so much specifically in this thread.

In closing, I just want to point out that I don't actually have anything against you, Malachy, but you really should get over yourself and stop being such an elitist prick sometimes. Perhaps you're just too used to babysitting the kids who frequent this thread, I don't know, but that's no reason to treat everybody like a 5 year old. Sort it out, because nobody respects the "I'm going to belittle everyone to assert my authority" attitude - it's just lame. People respect nice guys like BlueHippo who don't have a superiority complex.

If you feel the need to respond to this, you can do so via a PM, as I likely won't bother to post in this thread again, lest I be called a +1 poster.

At 4/19/08 09:58 PM, NEVR wrote: Anyway, I'm done irritating Malachy by questioning the system. Let's hope that the rest of you guys don't wear down his patience enough to force him to erupt into the raging, ever-swearing review mod monster again. It's not a good look.

We all have boiling points, so we can assume Malachy is human.

At 4/19/08 10:03 PM, Malachy wrote:

At 4/19/08 09:58 PM, NEVR wrote:

At 4/19/08 09:38 PM, Malachy wrote: That's about as well put as one can get it, NEVR. now stop bitching and start linkin' ^_^

LOL, I don't really think asking for a clarification qualifies as bitching. Tell the whiney kids who actually are bitching to shut up, rather than the guy who's just trying to get something cleared up. ;)

I wasn't talking to you about bitching per se, I was speaking to everyone having conniption fits, and since you asked a question regarding the system, BR's post answered it. I meant to hit "italic" not "bold".

I'm glad to have hear this, and there you have it folks. Please use your better judgment when marking reviews as abusive, and in the case of the spamming group. Only mark the ones that are "Highly Abusive & doesn't pertain to the truth, about their behavior as a spamming group". :-)

so if you don't flag much, and you don't cling to this thread or contribute to it, would you agree that you are simply in here posting for a +1 on your post count?

Well, I have defend NEVR on this one as he did raise a issue (starting with skemmtum) about a confusion, which thankfully can be somewhat resolved. He's raised a good question.

bevas11
flag these 3 reviews for submissions,

Zombie for your love
De-Emo
Chris Crocker in Blender

see, he consistently has to make relaly long strings of "hahahaha" and of course, the first one is a dead give away.

At 4/19/08 10:47 PM, liquidfire666 wrote:

At 4/19/08 10:41 PM, Malachy wrote: Chris Crocker in Blender

How is that one abusive? I can see that it would be unhelpfull but i dont really see how its abusive he's not insulting the author at all or anything. But i guess ill go with it because you are the guy that will delete it i'm just wandering what rule its breaking that makes it abusive.

oh, it sort of goes along with the repeating characters things. Also, calling "britny" a dumb ass doesn't really help anyone. It's more because of his other reviews than the review itself.

Only the first one is actually abusive, but I can't get over how he CAPS almost all his reviews. Please judge accordingly.

DEADBONE's Reviews

At 4/19/08 11:07 PM, BR wrote: Only the first one is actually abusive, but I can't get over how he CAPS almost all his reviews. Please judge accordingly.

DEADBONE's Reviews

all of his reviews were written long before we even thought of review guidelines. 2001 and 2002 are a bit beyond. Unfortunately they won't get you any whistle points..positive or negative.

here's a long list
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /432950/12/scoredoctor-martha,gabbyg

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /432950/11/scorezombie-ash,xDrLiVinGsToN x,cyborgo,Lucifer54,Razputin66

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /432950/10/scorezoink540,cmclav,metroidk id1992,carrotcrap1

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /432950/9/scoredesertboy,ChampionFreak,t ano1,Hotrod392,Snake-a-tobis
,crazygamer325

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /432950/8/scoreWolfsaber,Diegoz,Galak-fy arr

oh, for got my seconed list

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /289462/39/scorepopsme,sammy123lol,marvX dude1016,satanicpoop
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /289462/38/score cranialx,bblgurl,Bereselius,rasmus-xP,Po intlessStuff,DeadNightWarrior
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /289462/37/scoreCaitlinsboy,DipownX,guil mon122,anawesomekid,shikas,Hellfire2312
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /289462/36/scoreshuggy99,OMGGhostie,HIGA PHIX,wordom,azrial01,loukasxx7, ShadowShika
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /289462/35/scoreknutdemon,kellyisthesex,
madwarrior16
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /289462/34/score,coolyo,chazad123,cokema n122,o14v,darklord533,erinmar13, codeslayer

http://onion14.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash/1 here has a few good ones for ya.

On page 1:
Nigra Hentai Quiz (and look, spam flash, but his review isn't even calling him out for spam)

On page 2:
SKATER V2 Christmas 2007
sk8motion

nothing on page 3...it's only 1 review anyway.

Yay! My whistle became Silver again! Thanks guys for all.

The 1st two
Reason: Spam/extremely useless review/voted with a 0 "accidently"

At 4/20/08 01:46 AM, liquidfire666 wrote: http://hateface.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash Warlords: Call to Arms

http://super-batman.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash/2 Deep Creatures : The Game the ones for the tankmen i'm unshure about but i marked as unhelpful

I'll tell you and everyone else here what another user told me. UNHELPFUL reviews are not ABUSIVE. Abusive is "Go kill yourself" "You're a retard" "You're a faggot" "Die in a fire" those are abusive.

The ones you linked to are unhelpful at best, but are not ABUSIVE. When you flame the author of the submission with insults and threats, like what I mentioned above, that is abusive, not "Gameplay sucked" "Controls lagged"