At 9/18/03 04:48 PM, ramagi wrote: No I think I'll be the top savior for a while, with a over 1000 point lead on an inactive and over 2k over fixit

You know you can't stay ahead of the robot forever...

-->JDOG

At 9/17/03 02:50 PM, gfoxcook wrote: yeah, the highest I ever got was #63, so I never made the top 50 list, but I'd rather make the top 50 exp list, anyway (like that'll happen anytime soon).

Yea i know what you mean..........

Anyway, looks like such idle talk about our popularity numbers has been ended forever by the dumping of the pop system. It was a fun stat at times, but nowhere near as important as the other two, so I don't mind too much. :::saluting dead popularity stat, which died at #436 about 12 hours ago, after having been 496 the day before... at least I gained a bunch in the right direction on the last update after falling for a whole week of not being around on the BBS:::

Yea it will forever be in the Obituaries with the flash movies/games.....*sniff*.........

Yeah, but just by you guys. #;-}> Most of general has forgotten about me... but that's a pretty good thing, overall. Still, back in March, I was pretty active on general. It was fun back then. A lot's different now. But the feeling of Wi/Ht never changes all that much. It's always great here (except when no one's online in the middle of the night #;-}>).

Yea thats tru, the General Topic has changed, nothing really there to talk about, at least here you can talk about interesting topics of interest and information......here you belong like Cheers or something........

At 9/18/03 10:17 PM, XkwiziTOnE wrote:

At 9/17/03 02:50 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

saluting dead popularity stat:::

Yea it will forever be in the Obituaries with the flash movies/games.....*sniff*.........

heh! true, true...

Yeah, but just by you guys. #;-}> Most of general has forgotten about me... but that's a pretty good thing, overall. Still, back in March, I was pretty active on general. It was fun back then. A lot's different now. But the feeling of Wi/Ht never changes all that much. It's always great here (except when no one's online in the middle of the night #;-}>).

Yea thats tru, the General Topic has changed, nothing really there to talk about, at least here you can talk about interesting topics of interest and information......here you belong like Cheers or something........

Cue "Where is/How to?" Title Screen and Theme Music:

"sometimes you wanna go
where everybody knows your naaaaaaame...
and they're always glad you caaaaaame...
you wanna be where you can see
our troubles are all the saaaame...
you wanna be where everybody knows your name..."

(piano ending)

ah yes...

At 9/18/03 05:03 PM, PimpMasterJDOG wrote:

At 9/18/03 04:48 PM, ramagi wrote: No I think I'll be the top savior for a while, with a over 1000 point lead on an inactive and over 2k over fixit

You know you can't stay ahead of the robot forever...

-->JDOG

Fixit... fixit is Norm's wife... Vera! We never saw her on camera in the entire run of the show.

Just like we'll never see fixit post here on Wi/Ht!

(now just watch him come in and post, now that I've said that #;-}>).

protections rank, number, name -- as of 07/26/2003 at 05:36 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 07/28/2003 at 03:21 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 08/02/2003 at 02:42 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 08/08/2003 at 15:21 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 08/15/2003 at 05:45 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 08/21/2003 at 09:36 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 08/28/2003 at 18:45 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 09/02/2003 at 23:45 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 09/15/2003 at 22:36 CDT

protections rank, number, name -- as of 09/22/2003 at 05:55 CDT
01 12,183 *** ramagi
02 11,047 *** RyoHahn
03 9,912 *** fixit
04 8,427 *** thisisasignin
05 7,900 *** gfoxcook
06 6,905 *** Bila
07 6,859 *** DrMSM
08 6,764 *** Recon_Rebel
09 6,655 *** TheJoe324
10 6,246 Toocool100
11 6,038 *** poxpower
12 5,633 *** Crono-
13 5,367 *** alexsmolik
14 5,295 *** Stormwarden
15 4,853 *** NemesisM66
16 4,520 *** helldoll81
17 4,472 *** XkwiziTOnE
18 4,448 *** vuorimies
19 4,378 *** Mr_Chuckles
20 4,324 *** leeboy105
21 4,225 *** chaotic1
22 4,096 *** HeRetiK
23 4,050 *** Newgrundling
24 3,952 *** D0GMA
25 3,841 *** RageVI
26 3,788 *** HAQnSPITT
27 3,696 *** stafffighter
28 3,609 *** Captain_Bob
29 3,605 *** GridLock
30 3,551 the_phantom_spancker
31 3,510 XwaynecoltX
32 3,422 CTTcrew_l2edfoX
33 3,319 *** biteme2514
34 3,259 Mystboy
35 3,258 *** b33r53x
36 3,192 Ppk3000
37 3,184 *** Dark00Stir-fry
38 3,163 *** kevr1
39 3,149 ImportRacer666
40 3,137 Bigmanbrainy
41 3,109 pingpong08
42 3,104 _redruM_
43 3,071 *** staphita
44 2,987 *** _lightning_
45 2,967 agent66
46 2,962 *** Denvish
47 2,961 Overtired
48 2,870 Mike277
49 2,866 *** YoinK
50 2,787 HernetheHunter

Congrats to:

chaotic1 on his promotion to Elite Guard First Lieutenant (20th)

since the last update of the list.

Welcome to:

No one.

Farewell to:

No one.

DANGER ZONE:

FlameClock's slowed down a bit, so Herne seems secure for now.

Greg's Notes:

Well, after many many months of the same exact format (aside from the addition of the ***s to indicate being on both lists that was introduced when the second list was introduced), I've decided to try out something new. While the update above this addendum is the same as usual, there will be an additional update BELOW this post. Mostly due to lightning's mentions of wanting to know total b/p points along with the blamcount or savecount, and also because of the recent discussions of %ages.

The new format features two columns of ranks, both this update's and last update's. I thought about doing a +/- thing after the name like Dogma does, but it would mean more work for me. The way it is now, all I have to do is copy the column in excel after I reorder the list but before I manually change the numbers of those who rose/fell spots on the list, paste that right next to the actual 1-50 order and there ya go. Please note that this new column will pretty much eliminate the need for me to sum up the action on the list in this section of the addendum, but I may still cover any major highlights.

It also features, as I pretty much revealed above, the save-to-blam and blam-to-save percentages for every member of the saviors and blammers list respectively. The percentage is calculated by dividing the saves by the blams or the blams by the saves and multiplying by 100, NOT by dividing saves or blams by the total b/p. Please remember this before asking why the %s here are different than those Dogma listed a month ago. I could reformat to do it that way, but I've had it this way since I made the excel file back in March and I'd rather not change it.

On the blammers list, everyone is pretty much >100% but <1000%, so 3 digits reign. On the saviors list, however, many are <100% and thus 2 digits, many are >100% and thus 3 digits, and some... (i.e. toocool100) are 4 digits to the left of the decimal point, and thus.... the list may look a little less aligned. We'll see if it looks okay.

And finally, it features the total blams and saves of each member. I could have included the blams (on the saves list) and the saves (on the blams list), but I felt it would be redundant to the EXTREME, and also even more confusing.

So anyway, I give the peoples what they be wanting. Now it's your turn: tell me if you like the new way (Whether in actuality or in principle), and if you want to, give advice on making it look better if you feel you've noticed something no one else has. But mostly:

PLEASE VOTE whether you want it to stay the way it always has been or change to this new (more informative but busier-looking) format. THANK YOU!

You may check out the most recent Top 50 Blammers List by clicking the link I just posted. Enjoy comparing the lists to each other and to the Top 50 Combined B/P List. People on both the Top 50 Blammers List and the Top 50 Protectors List are denoted with ***.

savior rank / previous rank / saves / save-to-blam % / total b/p / name -- as of 09/22/2003 at 05:55 CDT
01 01 12,183 59.25% 32,746 *** ramagi
02 02 11,047 71.99% 26,393 *** RyoHahn
03 03 9,912 52.44% 28,812 *** fixit
04 04 8,427 60.25% 22,414 *** thisisasignin
05 05 7,900 89.77% 16,700 *** gfoxcook
06 06 6,905 88.22% 14,732 *** Bila
07 07 6,859 86.77% 14,764 *** DrMSM
08 08 6,764 77.62% 15,478 *** Recon_Rebel
09 09 6,655 32.99% 26,827 *** TheJoe324
10 10 6,246 7097.73% 6,334 Toocool100
11 11 6,038 85.17% 13,127 *** poxpower
12 12 5,633 36.61% 21,019 *** Crono-
13 13 5,367 84.48% 11,720 *** alexsmolik
14 14 5,295 47.98% 16,330 *** Stormwarden
15 15 4,853 37.38% 17,835 *** NemesisM66
16 16 4,520 62.95% 11,700 *** helldoll81
17 18 4,472 65.19% 11,332 *** XkwiziTOnE
18 17 4,448 83.00% 9,807 *** vuorimies
19 19 4,378 76.02% 10,137 *** Mr_Chuckles
20 20 4,324 81.28% 9,644 *** leeboy105
21 21 4,225 62.32% 11,004 *** chaotic1
22 22 4,096 72.38% 9,755 *** HeRetiK
23 23 4,050 57.15% 11,137 *** Newgrundling
24 24 3,952 47.78% 12,224 *** D0GMA
25 25 3,841 68.65% 9,436 *** RageVI
26 26 3,788 55.68% 10,591 *** HAQnSPITT
27 27 3,696 58.52% 10,012 *** stafffighter
28 29 3,609 53.47% 10,358 *** Captain_Bob
29 28 3,605 38.54% 12,958 *** GridLock
30 30 3,551 98.18% 7,168 the_phantom_spancker
31 31 3,510 93.93% 7,247 XwaynecoltX
32 32 3,422 114.41% 6,413 CTTcrew_l2edfoX
33 33 3,319 77.20% 7,618 *** biteme2514
34 34 3,259 94.88% 6,694 Mystboy
35 35 3,258 62.22% 8,494 *** b33r53x
36 36 3,192 110.60% 6,078 Ppk3000
37 37 3,184 67.33% 7,913 *** Dark00Stir-fry
38 38 3,163 68.67% 7,769 *** kevr1
39 39 3,149 100.80% 6,273 ImportRacer666
40 42 3,137 147.42% 5,265 Bigmanbrainy
41 41 3,109 98.57% 6,263 pingpong08
42 40 3,104 129.55% 5,500 _redruM_
43 43 3,071 56.59% 8,498 *** staphita
44 47 2,987 57.68% 8,166 *** _lightning_
45 44 2,967 124.04% 5,359 agent66
46 46 2,962 52.94% 8,557 *** Denvish
47 45 2,961 189.81% 4,521 Overtired
48 48 2,870 95.89% 5,863 Mike277
49 49 2,866 61.74% 7,508 *** YoinK
50 50 2,787 106.37% 5,407 HernetheHunter

Well i already posted about this new format - i said in the Blams list and i will post it here - i like it and it as informative as always......you da man FOX!

I like that new way much ... but I'm just a little bit confused about the save-to-blam/blam-to-save thing ... I mean ... is a 100% save-to-blam mean a 10/10 ratio? Uh ... in fact it would be pretty logical ... damn ... sometimes I'm pretty dumb ...

3 spots higher go me! =) that's why i like the new format with the old one you need to check the old one and that takes too long

i wish i never got those 88 blams :'(

At 9/22/03 10:48 PM, Toocool100 wrote: i wish i never got those 88 blams :'(

awwwwww dont cry it will be alright you will do better next time..........i have faith in ya....

okay, based on the positive responses to the new format, I've cropped the list to the top 10 from the last update, and changed it to three different formats that should improve readability a bit. I'm doing this in both top 50 topics, BTW. Please vote on whether you like the top, middle, or bottom one best (top has boldface, as recommended by biteme, middle has --s in a couple of good places, and bottom has both):

savior rank / previous rank / saves / save-to-blam % / total b/p / name -- as of 09/22/2003 at 05:55 CDT
01 01 12,183 59.25% 32,746 *** ramagi
02 02 11,047 71.99% 26,393 *** RyoHahn
03 03 9,912 52.44% 28,812 *** fixit
04 04 8,427 60.25% 22,414 *** thisisasignin
05 05 7,900 89.77% 16,700 *** gfoxcook
06 06 6,905 88.22% 14,732 *** Bila
07 07 6,859 86.77% 14,764 *** DrMSM
08 08 6,764 77.62% 15,478 *** Recon_Rebel
09 09 6,655 32.99% 26,827 *** TheJoe324
10 10 6,246 7097.73% 6,334 Toocool100

savior rank / previous rank -- saves / save-to-blam % / total b/p -- name -- as of 09/22/2003 at 05:55 CDT
01 01 -- 12,183 59.25% 32,746 -- *** ramagi
02 02 -- 11,047 71.99% 26,393 -- *** RyoHahn
03 03 -- 9,912 52.44% 28,812 -- *** fixit
04 04 -- 8,427 60.25% 22,414 -- *** thisisasignin
05 05 -- 7,900 89.77% 16,700 -- *** gfoxcook
06 06 -- 6,905 88.22% 14,732 -- *** Bila
07 07 -- 6,859 86.77% 14,764 -- *** DrMSM
08 08 -- 6,764 77.62% 15,478 -- *** Recon_Rebel
09 09 -- 6,655 32.99% 26,827 -- *** TheJoe324
10 10 -- 6,246 7097.73% 6,334 -- Toocool100

savior rank / previous rank -- saves / save-to-blam % / total b/p -- name -- as of 09/22/2003 at 05:55 CDT
01 01 -- 12,183 59.25% 32,746 -- *** ramagi
02 02 -- 11,047 71.99% 26,393 -- *** RyoHahn
03 03 -- 9,912 52.44% 28,812 -- *** fixit
04 04 -- 8,427 60.25% 22,414 -- *** thisisasignin
05 05 -- 7,900 89.77% 16,700 -- *** gfoxcook
06 06 -- 6,905 88.22% 14,732 -- *** Bila
07 07 -- 6,859 86.77% 14,764 -- *** DrMSM
08 08 -- 6,764 77.62% 15,478 -- *** Recon_Rebel
09 09 -- 6,655 32.99% 26,827 -- *** TheJoe324
10 10 -- 6,246 7097.73% 6,334 -- Toocool100

At 9/22/03 08:20 AM, XkwiziTOnE wrote: Well i already posted about this new format - i said in the Blams list and i will post it here - i like it and it as informative as always......you da man FOX!

At 9/22/03 10:00 AM, Mystboy wrote: I like that new way much ... but I'm just a little bit confused about the save-to-blam/blam-to-save thing ... I mean ... is a 100% save-to-blam mean a 10/10 ratio? Uh ... in fact it would be pretty logical ... damn ... sometimes I'm pretty dumb ...

At 9/22/03 11:23 AM, _lightning_ wrote: 3 spots higher go me! =) that's why i like the new format with the old one you need to check the old one and that takes too long

6 votes total (Xkwizit, Mystboy, lightning, leeboy, Captain_Bob, biteme), and every single one says yes... so a nice unarguable 100% vote for the new way.

I would have liked to hear what some other people said, like Recon and Dogma for instance, but they still have a chance to look at the three new ways the list could appear each update, so... get out there and vote, people!

Anyway, I think you got the hang of it there, Mystboy. save-to-blam % is saves/blams x 100... blam-to-save % is blams/saves x 100. I just like the results it gives better than saves/total x 100 or blams/total x 100, as the dramatic difference in people like toocool's stats are made clear.

If you divided toocool's saves by his total points and turned it into a percentage, you'd just have 99.85% or something. But when you do it saves divided by blams, you get a very impressive 7000.00% or whatever it is exactly. #;-}>

and lastly, I'm glad to hear you like the "this update/last update" rank columns, lightning.

Again, the third format looks better ...

At 9/22/03 10:48 PM, Toocool100 wrote: i wish i never got those 88 blams :'(

try asking wade/tom/james too delet those points =)

At 9/23/03 09:04 AM, Mystboy wrote: Again, the third format looks better ...

Dude, I totally agree, it's way more profesionnal!
But isn't it like thrice the same thing ???

At 9/23/03 10:54 AM, _lightning_ wrote:

At 9/22/03 10:48 PM, Toocool100 wrote: i wish i never got those 88 blams :'(

try asking wade/tom/james too delet those points =)

do you think they would?

i also agree, the third one is better!

At 9/23/03 11:49 AM, Toocool100 wrote: do you think they would?

you can all way's try =)

btw i have a question for you all i want too change my e mail but i don't know in too what i was thinking tricktheclown it's got a ng sound too it and it won't sound all that stupid (well not too much) for people that don't know ng. butlike 20 minutes afther thinking up that name for a new mail i tought it may sound too stupid so what do you all think? change it don't change it or change it too some thing els. i posted this here becouse my browser craches every time i post on this bbs now =( so it would take too long too post a reply too toocool and post that =P

At 9/23/03 11:05 AM, alexsmolik wrote:

At 9/23/03 09:04 AM, Mystboy wrote: Again, the third format looks better ...

Dude, I totally agree, it's way more profesionnal!
But isn't it like thrice the same thing ???

Nope. All three are different attempts to make it more "user-friendly" for those simply trying to scan the lists. The first uses bold font to aoffset some data, making it more differentiable more the rest. The second uses occasional insertions of -- to try and break it up, while the third is a combination of both. Life would be soooo much easier if we could use <tr>, <th>, and <td> ... although it would likely turn my updates into 8 or 12 posts lol

hey lightning, did you really mean change your E-MAIL to tricktheclown? What difference does that make on NG? I'm assuming you meant to say change your NG USERNAME to tricktheclown. If you did... PLEASE DON'T. God, that would be horrible.

Everyone knows you as lightning, and presumably you like the name or you never would have chosen it in the first place and made several sigpicss and profile pics with it... so... why change now? Eh.

At 9/23/03 09:28 PM, D0GMA wrote:

At 9/23/03 11:05 AM, alexsmolik wrote:

At 9/23/03 09:04 AM, Mystboy wrote: Again, the third format looks better ...

Dude, I totally agree, it's way more profesionnal!
But isn't it like thrice the same thing ???

Nope. All three are different attempts to make it more "user-friendly" for those simply trying to scan the lists. The first uses bold font to aoffset some data, making it more differentiable more the rest. The second uses occasional insertions of -- to try and break it up, while the third is a combination of both. Life would be soooo much easier if we could use <tr>, <th>, and <td> ... although it would likely turn my updates into 8 or 12 posts lol

Thanks for answering alex there, I was about to post to him when I noticed you'd already summed up the differences (though I had already, actually.... heh...). I was gonna do this to emphasize the point of the three choices, so I might as well anyway in case your explanation still didn't work:

A) blahblahblah blahblah! blah blah BLAH!
B) blahblahblah -- blahblah! -- blah blah BLAH!
C) blahblahblah -- blahblah! -- blah blah BLAH!

Now do you see the differences, alex? #;-}>

Anywho:

Once again, six people (Mystboy, alexsmolik, toocool, leeboy, biteme, Dogma) have all voted the same way! Heh. Third choice wins, hands down, unless 7 people come along in the next day or so wanting the first or second choice, and I doubt that very muchly.

I'll be making the next update quite soon, I wanted to hit 9000/8000 (17000 total) perfectly, but I'm gonna miss it by a bit, probably, but I'll fudge my profile and my stats on the lists a bit up and a bit down to fit. #;-}> When I get to 17000, I shall update and ye shall all see the new format! Woot.

till then...

T-MINUS 5 POSTS TO 3000.....

At 9/24/03 07:43 AM, gfoxcook wrote: hey lightning, did you really mean change your E-MAIL to tricktheclown? What difference does that make on NG? I'm assuming you meant to say change your NG USERNAME to tricktheclown. If you did... PLEASE DON'T. God, that would be horrible.

Everyone knows you as lightning, and presumably you like the name or you never would have chosen it in the first place and made several sigpicss and profile pics with it... so... why change now? Eh.

lol i don't what too change my name just my mail my ng name is fine =) sorry for not being clear... again. but any way trickytheclow was just a (stupid) idea. i suck at thinking of names so ideas would be great the the one thinks of the new mail will get a cookie =)

Well fixit finally joined the 10K group for saves. I don't think anyone else will make it before Oct 14th. That was the first day saves were possible to get.

At 9/24/03 07:43 AM, gfoxcook wrote: Now do you see the differences, alex? #;-}>

Oooh... Now I see perfectly what was going on there hehehe.
I think I didn't even distinguished the HTML differences !
Am I stupid.
:-)

{{{ gfoxcook }}}

At 9/23/03 07:22 AM, gfoxcook wrote: okay, based on the positive responses to the new format, I've cropped the list to the top 10 from the last update, and changed it to three different formats that should improve readability a bit (top has boldface, as recommended by biteme).

The top one is much easier to read gfox. I vote for the first format. Something tells me I'm too late on this.

At 9/24/03 07:43 AM, gfoxcook wrote: Once again, six people (Mystboy, alexsmolik, toocool, leeboy, biteme, Dogma) have all voted the same way! Heh. Third choice wins, hands down, unless 7 people come along in the next day or so wanting the first or second choice, and I doubt that very muchly.

Blah, blah BLAH! I knew I was too late (not that it matters). I still like the first list so there.

At 9/25/03 08:18 PM, Recon_Rebel wrote:

At 9/23/03 07:22 AM, gfoxcook wrote: okay, based on the positive responses to the new format, I've cropped the list to the top 10 from the last update, and changed it to three different formats that should improve readability a bit (top has boldface, as recommended by biteme).

The top one is much easier to read gfox. I vote for the first format. Something tells me I'm too late on this.

I've kinda decided to go with an "in between" option which will feature all the boldface of the first option, but less --iness. You'll see. More comments at that point are welcome, but at this point it's grown from 0-0-6 to 1-0-7, so yeah, it is a bit too late. #;-}> Update due tonight, I would have done it early this morning, but well... as we all know, NG was dead.

The Unofficial Newgrounds Top 50 Protectors List -- as of 09/26/2003 at 20:20 CDT

Congrats to:

Recon_Rebel on his promotion to Elite Guard Lieutenant Colonel (10th) &
RageVI on his promotion to Elite Guard Second Lieutenant (28th)

since the last update of the list.

Welcome to:

No one.

Farewell to:

No one.

DANGER ZONE:

Herne had a 2 save lead on Flame Clock (alias Emperor Pilaf) as of the stat check. He'll be off the list he made a month ago if he doesn't shape up.

Greg's Notes:

New format is here, and here to stay, but it doesn't have to stay THIS way. If you have major problems with it, let me know. Otherwise, I will continue to retool it. Keep in mind that I'm not trying only to make it aesthetically pleasing, but also easy for me to update from my excel file. As it is now, it's easy. Too much column alignment would add time to my updates and thus make them happen less often.

REMARKABLE few days for the list. It's been 4 days since the update (and there's been plenty of times when it was only 2 days or 3 days between updates, and this has NEVER happened before):

ONLY THREE PEOPLE ON THE LIST MOVED.

Well, okay, 6 people moved, but only 3 people on the list PASSED other people. Since there's so few, I'll note them this time:

GridLock passed Captain Bob
Denvish passed agent66 (who is inactive)
YoinK passed Mike277 (who is inactive)

IOW, only one REAL competitive passing occurred this week on the top 50 saves. This means at least one (and probably both) of two things: Either we're all not getting many saves (Duh! #;-}>) or we're all holding relatively steady in our upwards motion, so as not to be passing people very often.

I don't expect this to continue for too long, though. After all, saves have been scarce since June but this has never happened before, even during the July 24th, 26th, and 28th updates, which were all 2 days apart.

More likely than not, this is more about the 3 major server issues in the past few days that have kept people from voting for approximately 18 hours out of the past week.

You may check out the most recent Top 50 Blammers List by clicking the link I just posted. Enjoy comparing the lists to each other and to the Top 50 Combined B/P List. People on both the Top 50 Blammers List and the Top 50 Protectors List are denoted with ***.

List Column Legend

rank = this update's rank
prev = last update's rank
--
saves = approximate # of protects as of the update time
s2b% = save-to-blam % (i.e. ratio of saves to blams, or: saves/blams x 100)
b/p = approximate combined blam and protect points as of the update time
*** = on both the top 50 protectors and top 50 blammers lists
----
name = username (not current name in all cases due to some who change their names often)

rank / prev -- saves / s2b% / b/p ---- name
================================================
01 01 -- 12,226 59.03% 32,939 *** ramagi
02 02 -- 11,057 72.01% 26,411 *** RyoHahn
03 03 -- 10,033 52.03% 29,316 *** fixit
04 04 -- 8,536 59.65% 22,846 *** thisisasignin
05 05 -- 8,000 88.89% 17,000 *** gfoxcook
06 06 -- 6,939 87.97% 14,827 *** Bila
07 07 -- 6,900 86.77% 14,852 *** DrMSM
08 08 -- 6,803 76.90% 15,649 *** Recon_Rebel
09 09 -- 6,709 32.80% 27,165 *** TheJoe324
10 10 -- 6,353 7219.32% 6,441 ---- Toocool100
11 11 -- 6,038 85.17% 13,127 *** poxpower
12 12 -- 5,715 36.62% 21,321 *** Crono-
13 13 -- 5,387 84.40% 11,770 *** alexsmolik
14 14 -- 5,319 48.04% 16,391 *** Stormwarden
15 15 -- 4,859 37.39% 17,856 *** NemesisM66
16 16 -- 4,524 62.97% 11,708 *** helldoll81
17 17 -- 4,516 65.03% 11,460 *** XkwiziTOnE
18 18 -- 4,469 82.67% 9,875 *** vuorimies
19 19 -- 4,384 76.12% 10,143 *** Mr_Chuckles
20 20 -- 4,360 81.09% 9,737 *** leeboy105
21 21 -- 4,264 61.56% 11,191 *** chaotic1
22 22 -- 4,096 72.38% 9,755 *** HeRetiK
23 23 -- 4,076 56.82% 11,250 *** Newgrundling
24 24 -- 3,964 47.83% 12,252 *** D0GMA
25 25 -- 3,915 67.53% 9,712 *** RageVI
26 26 -- 3,789 55.70% 10,592 *** HAQnSPITT
27 27 -- 3,731 58.44% 10,115 *** stafffighter
28 29 -- 3,645 38.36% 13,146 *** GridLock
29 28 -- 3,632 53.41% 10,432 *** Captain_Bob
30 30 -- 3,551 98.18% 7,168 ---- the_phantom_spancker
31 31 -- 3,513 93.93% 7,253 ---- XwaynecoltX
32 32 -- 3,422 114.41% 6,413 ---- CTTcrew_l2edfoX
33 33 -- 3,347 76.02% 7,750 *** biteme2514
34 34 -- 3,292 93.66% 6,807 ---- Mystboy
35 35 -- 3,275 61.80% 8,574 *** b33r53x
36 36 -- 3,192 110.60% 6,078 ---- Ppk3000
37 37 -- 3,184 67.30% 7,915 *** Dark00Stir-fry
38 38 -- 3,165 68.63% 7,777 *** kevr1
39 39 -- 3,158 100.67% 6,295 ---- ImportRacer666
40 40 -- 3,157 146.56% 5,311 ---- Bigmanbrainy
41 41 -- 3,121 97.99% 6,306 ---- pingpong08
42 42 -- 3,104 129.55% 5,500 ---- _redruM_
43 43 -- 3,071 56.57% 8,500 *** staphita
44 44 -- 3,007 57.76% 8,213 *** _lightning_
45 46 -- 2,970 52.99% 8,575 *** Denvish
46 45 -- 2,967 124.04% 5,359 ---- agent66
47 47 -- 2,963 188.49% 4,535 ---- Overtired
48 49 -- 2,888 61.74% 7,566 *** YoinK
49 48 -- 2,870 95.89% 5,863 ---- Mike277
50 50 -- 2,789 106.01% 5,420 ---- HernetheHunter
================================================
rank / prev -- saves / s2b% / b/p ---- name

At 9/26/03 11:02 PM, gfoxcook wrote: rank / prev -- saves / s2b% / b/p ---- name
================================================
01 01 -- 12,226 59.03% 32,939 *** ramagi
02 02 -- 11,057 72.01% 26,411 *** RyoHahn
03 03 -- 10,033 52.03% 29,316 *** fixit
04 04 -- 8,536 59.65% 22,846 *** thisisasignin
05 05 -- 8,000 88.89% 17,000 *** gfoxcook
06 06 -- 6,939 87.97% 14,827 *** Bila
07 07 -- 6,900 86.77% 14,852 *** DrMSM
08 08 -- 6,803 76.90% 15,649 *** Recon_Rebel
09 09 -- 6,709 32.80% 27,165 *** TheJoe324
10 10 -- 6,353 7219.32% 6,441 ---- Toocool100

Ah yes, that's much more like it.

Nothing like sweet sweet 0's to fix everything.

So anywho, what does everyone think, already? I know I'm being impatient, and that the BBS was down, but there's been at least 1.5 hours during which Wi/Ht was readable and postable, but after I'd posted the lists, in which no one's said a peep about them! I want feedback, damnit! :::pouts::: #;-}>

Personally, I think they look freakin' kick-ass. The boldface helps a lot, the extra data isn't as "bad" as I had always thought it would be (and thus hadn't introduced before now).

My only criticisms are how digit differences misalign the list. Aside from my accident omission of the 0's on the other list for 1-9, all the other misalignments were intention, but... while on the old list the only thing that misaligned anything were the people with greater than 10,000 blams or saves, now in addition to that there's:

the %
the total b/p

I'm thinking that in future updates, I may enforce a xxx.xx% on the % (well, actually, a xxxx.xx% on the % on the protectors list, because of toocool, but one less on the blammers list since no one has a 1000.00% or greater blam-to-save ratio, thank goodness)...

and I may enforce a xx,xxx on the b/p

I think the %s wouldn't look so bad with an enforced digit amount, but I'm not so sure a vast majority of b/p counts being 09,000 or 05,555 or whatever is going to look so hot. Thoughts? I can always give it a spin, assuming I can get excel to agree to do that (and I seem to remember doing it years ago), on the next update and see what people think at that point. I might be updating around the 1st of the month if I'm itching to try this, otherwise, by next weekend at the very latest.

At 9/27/03 07:30 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

So anywho, what does everyone think, already? I know I'm being impatient, and that the BBS was down, but there's been at least 1.5 hours during which Wi/Ht was readable and postable, but after I'd posted the lists, in which no one's said a peep about them! I want feedback, damnit! :::pouts::: #;-}>

Well, apart from the obvious absence of me, the lists look great - seems a lot more informative, although I think the percentages would look better if you list them as a percentage, not as a ratio (ie. I'd have a 69% blam rate, and not a 227% rate if I've done my sums right on the second figure).

Personally, I think they look freakin' kick-ass. The boldface helps a lot, the extra data isn't as "bad" as I had always thought it would be (and thus hadn't introduced before now).

Lists do look good, I have to admit.

I'm thinking that in future updates, I may enforce a xxx.xx% on the % (well, actually, a xxxx.xx% on the % on the protectors list, because of toocool, but one less on the blammers list since no one has a 1000.00% or greater blam-to-save ratio, thank goodness)...

and I may enforce a xx,xxx on the b/p

If it makes it look better, do it.

I think the %s wouldn't look so bad with an enforced digit amount, but I'm not so sure a vast majority of b/p counts being 09,000 or 05,555 or whatever is going to look so hot. Thoughts? I can always give it a spin, assuming I can get excel to agree to do that

Yeah, it's easy enough to get excel to put leading zeroes in. I just forget how to do it :-)