Fuck, I forgot to tape the NXT premeir..... :( Haven't watched this week's RAW, either, as usual.
Can't wait to see Big Zeke finally have the chance to tear the house down; I've been waiting for this day ever since he first showed up. Now that he's getting the spotlight on him instead of helping someone else whose character just wasn't going anywhere get wins, I can easily see him getting the Heavyweight/WWE Title & just going nuts with it.
If there's anyone who needs a rocket strapped to them, it's him.
At 2/18/10 07:34 AM, TheD-LucksEdition wrote:
At 2/17/10 12:20 PM, MudkipsPiano wrote:
I want to fuck Sheamus so bad it's not even funny.
Oh my.
Like Random-Hero said, that made my day. :P
At 2/20/10 12:55 AM, aviewaskewed wrote:
At 2/19/10 11:23 PM, Random-Her03 wrote:
According to wwe.com, William Regal has replaced MVP as a Pro in NXT.
Regal is now mentoring Skip Sheffield while MVP is mentoring no one.
He pissed somebody off...had to have pissed somebody off at some point in time to be getting removed from any and all opportunities it seems to move up the card. I'd dearly love to find out what he did.
That's got me curious, too..... :( I mean, I'm all for Regal having something meaningful to do, but still, that sucks.
At 2/21/10 12:49 AM, Outlaw88 wrote:
F4WOnline.com is reporting that since WWE has decided to run a Money In The Bank PPV of its own, the Money in the Bank Ladder Match appears to be scrapped from this year's WrestleMania card. Additionally, it's being said that a number of mid-card talents are upset that the match is being scrapped this year as the WrestleMania pay off is something that they don't want to miss out on, and with the Ladder Match not taking place this will leave several of those talents without a spot on the card.
That kinda sucks. I think MITB was best suited for WM and made sense to help build a potential future champion by winning that shot at the biggest PPV.
Well, if they are still keeping MitB on the WM card (at least for now), it wouldn't bother me if they did it twice a year - assuming they do it right.............which is always a problem for them.
At 2/21/10 11:29 PM, boloneyman wrote:
Stop me if you've heard this one. John Cena wins a Elimination Chamber only to have the celebration cut short by Vince who tells him he must immediately defend a title against a new opponent who hits a spear and quickly pins Cena to become the new NEW WWE champion.
Anyone could see this 500,000 miles away. Same for Edge/Jericho - but not quite how I was expecting it (I expected Taker to win & Edge to somehow get it off him after EC).
At 2/23/10 06:20 AM, Random-Her03 wrote:
It looks like Yoshi is officially a RAW wrestler now.. I had a feeling he'd end up on RAW.. shame really
Now Evan has someone to talk to backstage.......
Also I guess Orton is on his way for a babyface run.. I bet he isn't happy about that. I remember in an interview Orton said he hated being a babyface back in 2002 and 2004 and enjoys being a heel way more. Also anybody see Orton after he gave DiBiase an RKO?.. he looked like a robot malfunctioning lol that's our Orton..
I forgot.......Orton was actually a face at one point, wasn't he? At this point, I can only see him at where Edge's at (a 'face-tweener'), but nothing beyond that.
Well the match is on, Michaels v Taker II at WM
If Michaels wins, he breaks the streak.. If he loses, his career is over.. This stipulation has really started to make me wonder who is going to win.. But I have a feeling, win or lose, Michaels will probably still be around after WM.
For once, this is a match that's nearly impossible to predict.
Bullriding segment was pretty much a waste of time... Big Show had me chuckling though, I reckon he should turn babyface soon.. seeing as he has a comedy movie coming out soon.. I like babyface big show so much better anyways.. he's too bland when he's a heel, when he's a babyface he has personality and he's easy to get behind.
Also I'm loving heel Batista.. he's pretty much the opposite of Big Show.. as a babyface, he's too bland but now that he's a heel, were seeing a whole new and very fresh Batista.. I like the little clap he gave to Cena when he won via DQ
Agreed on both points. Show has always made a better face, and Batista's been on the biggest roll of his career, IMO. Some people just have their niches.
At 2/23/10 12:15 PM, aviewaskewed wrote:
Yeah they really make the women such a joke these days. With the TV PG rating stopping them from just having D-Cups slung across the ropes and shit all the time it's like they've just given up trying to figure out how to make them useful.
Which is why TNA will always be on top in that department until WWE gets a clue finally. Maybe that'll change when Steph takes office.....
She does but I think she blew her chances when she did that interview saying she didn't want to leave TNA but just needed the money WWE could offer. You say that publicly, and even if WWE had big plans for her they're basically screwed into not pushing her because how do you push somebody who is publicly saying "I don't want to be here, I'd rather be with the competition"?
Thus proving what I just said.
Seemed that way to me too, but with any luck the idea was to push him and see what he has on his own vs. immediately sending him to SD! and reminding everybody he's Edge's brother. I don't really think Christian is a guy that will be world champion and be a draw, but he's easily a 1a short timer champion sort of guy.
.......
Wait, he's related to Edge? Somebody really needs to start telling me these things!
What was wrong with Sheamus? He did a really good job and let's not forget that a MITB winner is able to cash in the title match at any time. It allows you to build a guy up so that when the he gets the title match he's ready to really carry the belt. Although the execution of it has tended to be cash in, win belt, lose belt quickly and then get belt back later if you handle the loss in the right way.
For not being on very long, Sheamus did quite well; so despite the circumstances of his push, it ended up being justified enough. Same for McIntyre.