Current Regs

i think im closely approaching a comeback to this forum, since i want to get more involved on the flash side of things again. have the regs changed much, or is the same group as before i left? i mean, can anyone kinda give me the short update on who the regs are?

ADD YOUR NAME IF YE BE A REG

1. BritishMoose
2. Rudy
3. ______.

I believe I'm a reg.

At 9/30/07 01:14 PM, Rudy wrote:

ADD YOUR NAME IF YE BE A REG

1. BritishMoose
2. Rudy
3. Luis
4. Radioactive24
5. CriminalDuder
6. Coaly
7. CitricSquid
8. BMK
9. Siggy0501
10. Cheektoghetto
11. KaynSlamdyke
12. Glaiel-Gamer
13. ShortMonkey
14. dEltaluca
15. trig01
16. ____________

I believe I'm a reg.

I think I've earned it by now. I took the liberty of including a few other people too :3

At 9/30/07 01:27 PM, Radioactive24 wrote: I think I've earned it by now. I took the liberty of including a few other people too :3

if youre recognized by name by others youd consider to be regs, you are. if you just want to be, you arent. and i dont recognize almost half of those names, but at least the crowd is somewhat the same...

At 9/30/07 01:30 PM, authorblues wrote:

At 9/30/07 01:27 PM, Radioactive24 wrote: I think I've earned it by now. I took the liberty of including a few other people too :3

if youre recognized by name by others youd consider to be regs, you are. if you just want to be, you arent. and i dont recognize almost half of those names, but at least the crowd is somewhat the same...

I approve the return of authorblues, now simple actionscript questions will again be met with answers far surpassing the expectations of the inquirer. You've been gone awhile, I think almost all those names radioactive listed are regs now.

At 9/30/07 01:58 PM, citricsquid wrote:

At 9/30/07 01:50 PM, BritishMoose wrote: With the exception of BMK. He's not a reg, he's a Mod.

A mod can be a regular....

I know, Luis is a Mod, if anyone forgot.

Regs

1. BritishMoose
2. Rudy
3. Luis
4. Radioactive24
5. CriminalDuder
6. Coaly
7. CitricSquid
8. BMK
9. Siggy0501
10. Cheektoghetto
11. KaynSlamdyke
12. Glaiel-Gamer
13. ShortMonkey
14. dEltaluca
15. trig01
16. Masterswordman
17.________

I'm a reg. I just read more than I post. Better not let this list get into public e4ye, or everyone will be begging to get on it. :-P

At 9/30/07 01:10 PM, BritishMoose wrote:

At 9/30/07 01:07 PM, authorblues wrote: Current Regs
i mean, can anyone kinda give me the short update on who the regs are?

ADD YOUR NAME IF YE BE A REG

1. BritishMoose
2. _______

I used to be regular, but then I stopped. I just keep coming here to see what you guys are doing, and after countless topics you guys still post like mad men. Keep up the good work.

RE: Homosexuality

I'm completely neutral on the issue. I feel it is the person's own decision and that preachy types shouldn't try to force the issue one way or another. Thats what it means to have freedom.

At 9/30/07 02:24 PM, Masterswordman wrote: RE: Homosexuality

I'm completely neutral on the issue. I feel it is the person's own decision and that preachy types shouldn't try to force the issue one way or another. Thats what it means to have freedom.

You leaving freedom too open, next people will fight to legalize stealing because freedom is when everyone shares everything they own. Which takes us to communism, which may seem like freedom, but it isn't. Freedom is when you abide by the laws set by a country so that you may experience what it has to offer to the fullest, the more freedoms we hand out the more anarchy there is creating an imbalance in society. Sooner or later, the people who are offering freedom now will not be, and will create a society of unjust decisions and people. There needs to always be more laws and less laws, its a matter of picking the right thing to fight for, the government legalizing gay marriage or whatever those gay people want, is a waste of government funding that could be put towards a stronger effort on health care to at least keep people alive. The amount of money and time it takes to work on laws is not worth letting gay people be gay and politically correct, while thousands of people suffer from poverty and children are orphaned. Homosexuals who fight the system are selfish and only care for their needs and not the needs to general public, they're cause is too specific and pointless.

At 9/30/07 02:33 PM, pixelz wrote:

You leaving freedom too open, next people will fight to legalize stealing because freedom is when everyone shares everything they own. Which takes us to communism, which may seem like freedom, but it isn't. Freedom is when you abide by the laws set by a country so that you may experience what it has to offer to the fullest, the more freedoms we hand out the more anarchy there is creating an imbalance in society. Sooner or later, the people who are offering freedom now will not be, and will create a society of unjust decisions and people. There needs to always be more laws and less laws, its a matter of picking the right thing to fight for, the government legalizing gay marriage or whatever those gay people want, is a waste of government funding that could be put towards a stronger effort on health care to at least keep people alive. The amount of money and time it takes to work on laws is not worth letting gay people be gay and politically correct, while thousands of people suffer from poverty and children are orphaned. Homosexuals who fight the system are selfish and only care for their needs and not the needs to general public, they're cause is too specific and pointless.

10% of the population identifies as homosexual... chances are you have multiple friends that are gay or have yet to come out. An issue of human injustice isn't a waste of time and seeing as we're willing to spend 2.whatever billion a week in Iraq in order to "liberate" 27 million people. I think congress can spend a fraction of their time in order to make 30 million people be able to share the same rights as the other 270 million.
If this country wasn't filled with homophobes this wouldn't be an issue but sadly the closed mindedness of many people makes others suffer an injustice.
If you're going to honestly say that allowing 1/10 of the population the right to marriage is a waste of time/money. I believe I get a right to say a war based on falsified evidence, the deconstruction of a working economy, and sending a country into civil war was a waste.

And in the 1950's all those fighting for black equality were selfish weren't they? because poverty definetly wasn't rampant and still recovering from the depression...

Herro again thought i'd check in.

At 9/30/07 02:19 PM, Masterswordman wrote: Regs

1. BritishMoose
2. Rudy
3. Luis
4. Radioactive24
5. CriminalDuder
6. Coaly
7. CitricSquid
8. BMK
9. Siggy0501
10. Cheektoghetto
11. KaynSlamdyke
12. Glaiel-Gamer
13. ShortMonkey
14. dEltaluca
15. trig01
16. Masterswordman
17.________

Why am I always so damn overlooked >.<

Ima back, although I doubt anyone cares.

So, I don't know if you guys have talked about them already, but how about the new Ipod Nano? I just ordered a red one... I like red.

At 9/30/07 02:24 PM, Masterswordman wrote: RE: Homosexuality

I'm completely neutral on the issue. I feel it is the person's own decision and that preachy types shouldn't try to force the issue one way or another. Thats what it means to have freedom.

I Agree, if people go around having protest for human rights, why should they not have rights? Well they have got some and everyone should agree to that, that it isnt worse that 50 years ago, but also everyone should realise that with aswel as people fighting against racism ect... People should fight for Homosexual rights aswel. After all if no one ever faught for their rights were would we be in the world. After all how is a gay man or woman effecting anyone? I dont see why anyone has anything against it.

Regs

1. BritishMoose
2. Rudy
3. Luis
4. Radioactive24
5. CriminalDuder
6. Coaly
7. CitricSquid
8. BMK
9. Siggy0501
10. Cheektoghetto
11. KaynSlamdyke
12. Glaiel-Gamer
13. ShortMonkey
14. dEltaluca
15. trig01
16. Masterswordman
17. El-Presidente
18. ________

Thanks a lot radioactive24. I'm always in here, yet you don't add me. I haven't even seen you here much until maybe like last week. I can't believe you're so insensitive....haha, just kidding, it's alright. Yeah, I do post a little too much. It's sad how like the 300 or 400 regs in the forums just post so much, it almost seems like we have no lives :P. Even though most....MOST of us do (Luis...ZAAL...BMK). You know what else I realized. All the mods and regs have names that are like really short, simple, and easily remember...versus like, the noobies who have names like NarutoFan200038857. Think about it. Almost none of the people have numbers, except for maybe like trig01, jmtb02, and those guys. Pixelz? Luis? Siggles? Just randomly named people. But you know what I mean. It's cool. Mines a lil too long :(.

1. BritishMoose
2. Rudy
3. Luis
4. Radioactive24
5. CriminalDuder
6. Coaly
7. CitricSquid
8. BMK
9. Siggy0501
10. Cheektoghetto(Sorry, but who?)
11. KaynSlamdyke
12. Glaiel-Gamer
13. ShortMonkey
14. dEltaluca
15. trig01
16. Masterswordman
17. El-Presidente
18. Depredation

I know i've not posted much over the past month or two, but i've been here for a while and i check in every day to see whats happening and such. I'll be posting more over now, as i'm sure you'll be glad to hear :P.

At 9/30/07 03:19 PM, El-Presidente wrote: Regs

1. BritishMoose
2. Rudy
3. Luis
4. Radioactive24
5. CriminalDuder
6. Coaly
7. CitricSquid
8. BMK
9. Siggy0501
10. Cheektoghetto
11. KaynSlamdyke
12. Glaiel-Gamer
13. ShortMonkey
14. dEltaluca
15. trig01
16. Masterswordman
17. El-Presidente
18. ________

Thanks a lot radioactive24. I'm always in here, yet you don't add me.

what ever happened to this?

im quite selective on who i consider a reg, i kind of have 4 tiers:

1 : The 'true' regs, whether they are regular contrabutors or have left
2 : The 'regs', those who've ive come to consider regs, but will not be a 'true' reg for quite some time
3 : The 'new' regs, those who i still don't quite consider regs even if they are regulars by some means
4 : The '....', those who are becoming regulars, but are far from being a 'new' reg even

Rudy / Resignation (BACK)

Rudy if you look from before, I said that, then if you look a little while back I decided not to after talking to some people from NG. I decided that this is my home haha, just kidding, but yeah, I decided that I'd rather stay on the BBS and write than start going and play too many video games. It kind of balances me out. You need me...it's the truth. :P!

1 : The 'true' regs, whether they are regular contrabutors or have left
2 : The 'regs', those who've ive come to consider regs, but will not be a 'true' reg for quite some time
3 : The 'new' regs, those who i still don't quite consider regs even if they are regulars by some means
4 : The '....', those who are becoming regulars, but are far from being a 'new' reg even

Go through the list of the people who said they were regs and tell us who you think is one and who isn't. Or at least who's a true reg, a reg, a new reg, and a ... . I hope that you don't call me a ... . I think that I'm between almost at a new reg, but I'm like a new reg who posts long and not so much, rather than posting not so much and having a lot of posts. That's like the general forum. And those people just piss me off.

At 9/30/07 02:24 PM, Masterswordman wrote: Thats what it means to have freedom.

We don't have freedom. Laws and rules contradict freedom.

At 9/30/07 03:35 PM, dELtaluca wrote: im quite selective on who i consider a reg, i kind of have 4 tiers:

I kind of have one. "The people I recognise from yesterday" tier.
And lol. Radioactive considers me a reg. Granted, John counted me as a reg in his 06 stick figure draw off and I mingled well enough at the UK Meet, so I guess my stripes are well earned now.

Four wheels good, two wheels better
Keekeekee... unlimited class bike course nearly completed... test on Thursday, and then hopefully I'll be dangerously overqualified... Anyone got a recommedation for what kind of bike I should cruise around in? :)

REGZ

I don't really consider myself part of the "current-reg" crew. Especially since NegativeOne is the only person who used to be in the Original Regular's crew who still sticks around. That was back before he was even a mod.

Meh, I still like all of you guys, it's just a different crew. :)

Sketchbook Tour

I LOVE the layout of this years Sketchbook tour! Luis and those who worked on it did an incredible job! The wait was well worth it. I LOVE the voice actor who did all of the names. I laughed so much at some of them.

I can't wait for next years edition :) Keep me in mind if you need any help with it again.

At 9/30/07 03:57 PM, Senti wrote: REGZ
I don't really consider myself part of the "current-reg" crew. Especially since NegativeOne is the only person who used to be in the Original Regular's crew who still sticks around. That was back before he was even a mod.

Even now, I'm kind of only borderline reg. I've been focusing a lot more on my Flash work. Which is a good thing, I suppose.

Awesome, I didn't have to put my own name on the reg list :D (Thanks Radioactive :-*)

Homosexuality

I am entirely neutral on this subject. I feel getting a marriage lisence to marry someone you love is definitly a freedom that should be extended to all citizens in this country, hetero or homosexual.

And I understand that marriage did come from the bible, and is considered a holy sacrement, but do atheists not get married? As far as I know being atheist does not exclude you from marriage. Marriage has become just a part of common culture, and cultures change with time.

Religion

Because subjects like abortion and homosexuality usually boil down to religion.

I personnally do not subscribe to any religion, but I do not think I am atheist. I believe there is something bigger out there, whether it be living, or just some sort of energy, or even something I can't even comprehend.

At 9/30/07 02:33 PM, pixelz wrote:

At 9/30/07 02:24 PM, Masterswordman wrote:

RE: Homosexuality

I'm completely neutral on the issue. I feel it is the person's own decision and that preachy types shouldn't try to force the issue one way or another. Thats what it means to have freedom.

There needs to always be more laws and less laws, its a matter of picking the right thing to fight for, the government legalizing gay marriage or whatever those gay people want, is a waste of government funding that could be put towards a stronger effort on health care to at least keep people alive. The amount of money and time it takes to work on laws is not worth letting gay people be gay and politically correct, while thousands of people suffer from poverty and children are orphaned. Homosexuals who fight the system are selfish and only care for their needs and not the needs to general public, they're cause is too specific and pointless.

Sorry for being a giant e-dick, but unless that was a brilliant piece of sarcasm that's the biggest piece of crap I've heard in a long while... What you're saying basically is that your government should ignore the wishes/needs of a minority because the funding could also go to the general public? The good thing about a democracy should be that every single minority can have their saying. It would be ethically incorrect if a government simply decides to deny those minorities to benefit the general public, although that is what often happens. I don't know if that 10 % nexttonothing speaks of is correct, but even if it's 1% or 0.1% it's still a group of people we're talking about, and they should have the right to do whatever they want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else. Straight people can marry, why not let gay people marry, it's not like it's the end of the world.

Regs

I think I'm a reg.. but I also try to keep my distance from the BBS sometimes so I can actually get things done. I used to post more than I do now but I still like browsing through threads and reading them.

1. BritishMoose
2. Rudy
3. Luis
4. Radioactive24
5. CriminalDuder
6. Coaly
7. CitricSquid
8. BMK
9. Siggy0501
10. Cheektoghetto
11. KaynSlamdyke
12. Glaiel-Gamer
13. ShortMonkey
14. dEltaluca
15. trig01
16. Masterswordman
17. El-Presidente

Awww... I'm # 5. :3 I feel special for some reason. Hmm.. I'ma gonna save a jar of pickles for all of ya so if I ever make it to a meet ya'll can eat my pickles.
Also: Their's actually quite a few regs eh? What ever happen to the "Flash Reg collab"? I heard somethin' 'bout that a while ago.

At 9/30/07 08:25 AM, Vengeance wrote: Funny how only one of the bands you listed after you said you really like death metal are death metal...

Oh definitely, I suck at categorizing the different genres. By the way, Death and Morbid Angel kick ass. Do you like At the Gates?

Re:Regs

At 9/30/07 03:35 PM, dELtaluca wrote: im quite selective on who i consider a reg, i kind of have 4 tiers:

1 : The 'true' regs, whether they are regular contrabutors or have left
2 : The 'regs', those who've ive come to consider regs, but will not be a 'true' reg for quite some time
3 : The 'new' regs, those who i still don't quite consider regs even if they are regulars by some means
4 : The '....', those who are becoming regulars, but are far from being a 'new' reg even

Yep this is how I see it too. And it's depressing thinking like that, since i'd personally consider someone like ShitTurtle as a new regular still. Wheras somebody like Senti for example may think of me as a new reg.

People like Liam, Kirk and Orb are people i'd say are the regs that I remember the most (as in a 'ooh back in the day' sorta way).

I was voted reggiest reg by the way, so take my word.

At 9/30/07 03:15 PM, spare-jello wrote: So, I don't know if you guys have talked about them already, but how about the new Ipod Nano? I just ordered a red one... I like red.

You just got fucking jacked. Look at it this way; You spent $199.99 dollars (I'm assuming you got the 8 gig, if you got the 4 gig, you're even more of a dumbass) on something with 8 gigs of memory.

If you have coughed up $50 more, you could have had 80 gigs.

Oh God, it's not colorful. The new iPod Nanos look even more ass ugly than the Nano v2.0s did! Jesus, the only redeemable feature of the new Nano is that it has a real screen! If you managed to buy an old one that has the 1"x1" screen, then you fucking deserve to have yourself swung by your scrotum over a fire.

By all means, I don't think the iPod is shit, i love mine. I don't really care that it's "cool" to have one. They're simple, they have decent memory space, and it runs an average price. I just hate when people opt for the $50 fucking dollars and sacrifice functionality over aesthetics. It's exactly what Apple wants, and you just are a fucking consumer whore.

if you can, cancel your order and get a regular iPod video. It's well worth the extra $50, plus it has edges, so you are less likely to drop it, unlike the iPiss Nano's "nodized aluminum and polished stainless steel" case. Also, it's 6.5 mm thin, which means you could snap it in half like a fucking twig.

Seriously, what the fuck were you thinking? You get 72 gigs for another $50, a bigger screen, and it's more stable. Heaven forbid you buy a $5 skin for your black/white iPod and make it red.