RE: Ebaums still an issue
At 7/1/07 05:14 PM, DFox wrote:
It started because a kid released a movie without any links to his site, credits, sponsorship, etc. That's simply what I call bad parenting. Just because it's on the computer doesn't mean his parents shouldn't have stepped in and said "hey, maybe you should get some links in this to your site and give yourself some credit."
And then everyone jumps on Ebaumsworld for offering him money... Did the 1,000 other sites that used it without permission offer him money? Of course not.
I would say about 95% of the Flash developers who actually get a game on Ebaumsworld (which is very, very, very few) would agree that it is a blessing if you set the Flash up right. If you have a link to your site in your Flash and it gets on Ebaumsworld, you're guaranteed a very nice traffic slow for a very nice amount of time. Ebaumsworld is still one of the top refferers to my site and the game that I got on there was posted over a year ago.
So, the only people who should be issuing public apologies are the people who gave Ebaumsworld a bad name.
I agree about the whole eBaums thing turning into a bandwagon with people who really have little relation to actually creating Flash, and there are plenty of similar, and recently, worse sites, so singling them out not longer makes much sense, but these sites as a good thing? Nope. I'm not buying it.
I have no doubt that there are benefits for Flash authors in getting as much distribution as possible - hell, I've experienced them too - but that doesn't mean that we have to abandon whatever sense of justice we have and actually try to support them. Do content stealing sites care that you're benefiting slightly? It's doubtful. Even if they did, it clearly wasn't enough to so much as send you an e-mail informing you of what was going on with your game. Whatever good may come to you as an author is entirely accidental.
Should authors be expected to layer links to their websites all over their work? No way. That's something you learn to do as you gain experience. If you were a new author with little experience on viral spreading of Flash content, could you really be expected to assume that some fucker would rip it and stick it on a page with eighteen banner ads and four popups with out so much as sending you some contact information? Or would you just assume that people would see you credited at the site you submitted to? The only reason that content stealing sites are seen as acceptable and inevitable is because we have allowed them to be so; we've accepted them.
Now, as an author you probably want to see your work viewed as much as possible. But just stop for a second and look at the current state of affairs. Hundereds, if not thousands, of sites; all almost identical; all featuring exactly the same content; all competing for ad revenue and every single one representing a fraction of the viewing public. They advertise 'ten new games added every weekday', achieving this by simply ripping ten games off from each other and the small percentage of sites which actually ask for permission or only accept content submitted by its creator. Is this really the ideal state of affairs? Is it even close?
It's not realistic to expect sites with their cynical 'ten a day' quotas to ask for permission for every single game they host, even if it's nice to think that maybe the people who actually put work into Flash could be in control, but damnit, even an e-mail along the lines of 'we are hosting x at y.com. If you have any objections to our hosting, send us a message and we will remove it promptly' would be acceptable. Even a goddamn autoamated message. Is that too much to ask? Ten automated messages a day? Is that too much to ask of someone?
If you don't want your inbox flooded, you should be leaving some mark on your submissions for free distribution. That's cool. If you're wanting to see your submission spread as much as possible, that's up to you. Hell, I'll be the first to use one. But don't assume for one second that shameless, cold, uncaring stealing of content is somehow the default state of affairs. There is no way that stealing without any indication of the author's wishes can possibly be considered 'a good thing'.
Content stealing may be very much a part of the internet - it may well be something that more experienced authors have learned to deal with, but don't for one second claim that it's somehow right or acceptable. There's a clear line between what's realistic and what's acceptable.