At 6/11/10 08:44 PM, Archon68 wrote: We dissected pig fetuses in Biology today. Of course, the most mature kid in my grade decided to cut out the pig's reproductive system. Oh, he also cut off the pig's jaw, snipped off all of her toes, popped one of her lungs, and punctured her eyes. Fantastic.

I'd make a joke about pig fetuses but I'm not sure is appropriate when in context.

im just so torn. i live in the usa but my heart has always been in the uk. Ok ive made up my mind i want nigeria to win.

At 6/12/10 08:27 AM, HDXmike wrote: I think in my entire life in total ive watched like 30 minutes of footy, i just find it so boring, tennis is way more fun to watch, and play, thats just my opinion though. Since it seems i need to always be supporting someone my heart remains with italy.

ill never forget you bianca...

Did you just say tennis > football?

You mad?

Ha kids up in here calling soccer football.

Hey whats up 'Reg' Lounge, how goes it? It's been awhile.

Cue who the hell are you comments

At 6/12/10 08:08 AM, Luis wrote: im just so torn. i live in the usa but my heart has always been in the uk. Ok ive made up my mind i want nigeria to win.

It would be nice to see the home team win too but there's a very small chance for that

At 6/12/10 09:15 AM, Starogre wrote:

At 6/12/10 08:08 AM, Luis wrote: im just so torn. i live in the usa but my heart has always been in the uk. Ok ive made up my mind i want nigeria to win.

It would be nice to see the home team win too but there's a very small chance for that

i think they probably have a shot against england arent their players like old and on walkers?

South Africa had better bring it. They're messing with tradition here, even though I'm totally down with Mexico kicking the crap out of them. :) Such political melodrama. I would very much like the UK, Spain, or Brasil, to win the whole thing for the resulting parties that would ensue.

UK win = festive rampant alcoholism
Spain win = festive rampant alcoholism & drug use
Brasil win = festive rampant alcoholism, drug use, and insane sex with a girl you hardly know.

At 6/12/10 10:53 AM, HDXmike wrote: I just dropped over to my friends party and hooked my ipod up to his speaker system and put on the NG theme tune, i cant believe how much everyone loved it !

Even at partys you cant get away from NG.

Fucking hell mike you should of been fucking a drunk bitch in the toilet.

At 6/12/10 10:23 AM, Luis wrote:

At 6/12/10 09:15 AM, Starogre wrote:

At 6/12/10 08:08 AM, Luis wrote: im just so torn. i live in the usa but my heart has always been in the uk. Ok ive made up my mind i want nigeria to win.

It would be nice to see the home team win too but there's a very small chance for that

i think they probably have a shot against england arent their players like old and on walkers?

haha yeah. i think they said that about italy too. and shouldn't you be rooting for bolivia?

gonna root for antartica myself

Right, so I don't mind the World Cup or anything (go England!), but why did people in my neighbourhood have to blow their bloody horns even before the match had started?
I'M TRYING TO WATCH DOCTOR WHO YOU FUCKTARDS

Err, *ahem*. Anyway, that episode of Doctor Who was surprisingly better than I expected. I would have hoped to know more about the 'room upstairs', but it was still nice to see the Doctor in such a scenario as the episode presented.

Also, excellent demo Luca. Always fun to see physics in action (real-lifers can shut up).

mehhh pretty disappointing games so far. all the matches i was looking forward to ended up in a draw

also, south korea winning to greece, rofl

lawwwwl:

You can plot graphs of ellipsi and generalised ellipsi style shapes with more than 2 foci following the same rule using static points, and a moving body constrained using a MultiPinJoint which keeps the sum of the distances constant :P

http://www.newgrounds.com/dump/item/d90d 5ee869f75d40e61cd49a93ce509c

At 6/12/10 07:13 PM, dELtaluca wrote: You can plot graphs of ellipsi and generalised ellipsi style shapes with more than 2 foci following the same rule using static points, and a moving body constrained using a MultiPinJoint which keeps the sum of the distances constant :P

Whoop dee doo, but what does it all mean, Basil?

Dude FIFA just must be controlling minds at this point. This is the first time I've ever submitted anything to NG, that got 0 comments. It's been up all day. I'd even welcome a negative comment like, "LOL...meh...pfft...fail", at this point. It's just a barren wasteland out there. Sheesh.

At 6/12/10 08:55 PM, doctormario wrote: Dude FIFA just must be controlling minds at this point. This is the first time I've ever submitted anything to NG, that got 0 comments. It's been up all day. I'd even welcome a negative comment like, "LOL...meh...pfft...fail", at this point. It's just a barren wasteland out there. Sheesh.

You don't have to thank me. Making others happy is something I do for free.

At 6/12/10 07:42 PM, fwe wrote: Whoop dee doo, but what does it all mean, Basil?

It's just an interesting application of the constraints in the physics engine :P

(Demo of all current constraints) http://www.newgrounds.com/dump/item/9a2d 2f8c69ad6af45e6535c2c1e2f320

Firstly, Rob fucking Green. >:(

Secondly, this week's Doctor Who is a belter but oh my giddy Aunt, next week!

I went on a liiiiiiiitle bit of a rampage in animation forums tonight..

This place is quite at 2am..

At 6/13/10 12:55 AM, Kirk-Cocaine wrote: Firstly, Rob fucking Green. >:(

Secondly, this week's Doctor Who is a belter but oh my giddy Aunt, next week!

i watched it last night and i dont even remember what it was about, hahahahah

must have been really crap

At 6/13/10 03:26 AM, JordanD wrote: This place is quite at 2am..

why do you claim this place to be so much at 2am but not as much at other times?

At 6/13/10 08:33 AM, Toast wrote:

At 6/13/10 03:26 AM, JordanD wrote: This place is quite at 2am..

why do you claim this place to be so much at 2am but not as much at other times?

I'm not saying its "so much", just really quiet..its not as quiet at 4pm for example..cuz ppls are awakes

At 6/13/10 08:43 AM, JordanD wrote:

At 6/13/10 08:33 AM, Toast wrote:

At 6/13/10 03:26 AM, JordanD wrote: This place is quite at 2am..

why do you claim this place to be so much at 2am but not as much at other times?

I'm not saying its "so much", just really quiet..its not as quiet at 4pm for example..cuz ppls are awakes

He knew what you were saying he was having a go at you for misspelling quiet as quite.

New BBS rule:

- To all posts containing sarcasm a picture of the "sarcmark" must be attached

At 6/13/10 09:50 AM, knugen wrote: - To all posts containing sarcasm a picture of the "sarcmark" must be attached

Justin Bieber is such a good singer.

At 6/13/10 09:50 AM, knugen wrote: New BBS rule:

- To all posts containing sarcasm a picture of the "sarcmark" must be attached

wait, but you attached it yourself, so it's sarcasm, right? so if it's sarcasm, then it means posts containing sarcasm don't need to have the sarcmark attached, so that means your post wasn't necessarily sarcastic, but then that means you're not being sarcastic and the rule is valid, but then it means that your post is sarcastic because it contains the sarcarm, so if it's sarcasm, then it means posts containing sarcasm don't need to have the sarcmark attached, so that means your post wasn't necessarily sarcastic, but then that means you're not being sarcastic and the rule is valid, but then it means that your post is sarcastic because it contains the sarcarm, so if it's sarcasm, then it means posts containing sarcasm don't need to have the sarcmark attached, so that means your post wasn't necessarily sarcastic, but then that means you're not being sarcastic and the rule is valid, but then it means that your post is sarcastic because it contains the sarcarm, so if it's sarcasm, then it means posts containing sarcasm don't need to have the sarcmark attached, so that means your post wasn't necessarily sarcastic, but then that means you're not being sarcastic and the rule is valid, but then it means that your post is sarcastic because it contains the sarcarm

oh fuck my head

At 6/13/10 09:50 AM, knugen wrote: New BBS rule:

- To all posts containing sarcasm a picture of the "sarcmark" must be attached

How 'bout that interrobang%u203D

Kirk went all 'This sentence is false on are asses'.

Also new sig. :)

At 6/13/10 10:35 AM, K-Guare wrote:

At 6/13/10 09:50 AM, knugen wrote: New BBS rule:

- To all posts containing sarcasm a picture of the "sarcmark" must be attached

How 'bout that interrobang%u203D

I asked my english teacher who boasts about having a degree and such if she knew what an interrobang was.

She didnt. Bitch.

I thought an interrobang was a CSI porno spoof.