I also found that pac-man write-up very interesting. A year and a half in development and revolutionized gaming. Having an idea man directing artists, sound makers, and programmers worked out I guess.
HO HO HOPE you become a Newgrounds Supporter this year!
We're working hard to give you the best site possible, but we have bills to pay and community support is vital to keep things going and growing. Thank you for considering!
No more animated sigs. :(
At 2/21/09 02:54 PM, The-Super-Flash-Bros wrote: I need to look into flash at the base level more some time. So primitives are all that the bytecode handles?
Yep. The actual objects are handled by native code.
Doing the useless
var a = ({ x : 123 }).x;
would be like
string 'x' // key
int 123 // value
object 1 // pop 2*n values, push object with n fields
getprop 'x' // pop object and push the field value
setreg 1 // assign value to function-local register
So it doesn't actually write to memory or anything, objects are values to bytecode as well.
You can check more out at http://haxe.org/com/libs/hxasm (links to a complete list of v9 ops).
I made an runtime script-to-bytecode compiler http://www.matumeistari.lv/stuff/console .swf, links to source, though that's also been succeeded by a compiler in hxformat as I never bothered to finish.
At 2/22/09 04:39 AM, orb wrote: Oh hey guys how's it goin :3
Just watched your mime submission - Awesome!
300 hours? Nice.
Haha what'd happen if my post about bytecode would be the first on the page again! >:p
It has the horrifying effect of causing constructive discussion for the duration of the page.
haha i'd kick your ass in Little big planet >=D
i actually highly doubt that :>
At 2/22/09 11:46 AM, GustTheASGuy wrote: Haha what'd happen if my post about bytecode would be the first on the page again! >:p
It has the horrifying effect of causing constructive discussion for the duration of the page.
Sorry about that :P
New Simpsons Theme
Seems a bit too modern, although still pretty good. I quite like the nostalgia the older one provides though...
At 2/22/09 01:23 PM, crushy wrote:At 2/22/09 11:46 AM, GustTheASGuy wrote: Haha what'd happen if my post about bytecode would be the first on the page again! >:pSorry about that :P
It has the horrifying effect of causing constructive discussion for the duration of the page.
New Simpsons Theme
What do guys think?
Seems a bit too modern, although still pretty good. I quite like the nostalgia the older one provides though...
Hmmmm... it was very long, as long as they do a short version like they did before with only like 2 of the scenes, then i'm happy ^_^
At 2/22/09 11:46 AM, GustTheASGuy wrote: Haha what'd happen if my post about bytecode would be the first on the page again! >:p
It has the horrifying effect of causing constructive discussion for the duration of the page.
I think it's above most of our heads, so we couldn't contribute constructively to the conversation anyway...
At 2/22/09 01:23 PM, crushy wrote: New Simpsons Theme
What the hell was wrong with the old one :S? They should have stopped the simpsons ages ago anyway, after about season 12 it started to get really bad.
At 2/22/09 02:54 PM, Depredation wrote:At 2/22/09 01:23 PM, crushy wrote: New Simpsons ThemeWhat the hell was wrong with the old one :S? They should have stopped the simpsons ages ago anyway, after about season 12 it started to get really bad.
it wasn't HD that's what
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q16KpquGs Ic
At 2/22/09 02:55 PM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: it wasn't HD that's what
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q16KpquGs Ic
Ronald Roll? :O
Attn: Liam
Please remove your site from StumbleUpon, it's annoying stumbling on to sites I already know about. Thanks.
At 2/22/09 02:55 PM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: it wasn't HD that's what
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q16KpquGs Ic
Ah sweet jesus, my ear drums just blew up, goddam cheap headphones.
At 2/22/09 11:38 AM, crushy wrote:At 2/22/09 04:39 AM, orb wrote: Oh hey guys how's it goin :3Just watched your mime submission - Awesome!
Thanks yo ;)
300 hours? Nice.
Yeah I worked pretty steadily throughout the semester on it, and I think it really paid off :)
No more animated sigs. :(
Impendingriot and I finished a game! Vote five!
It's not really epic or anything... but it feels good to finish something.
I hope the link works the way it should...
At 2/22/09 04:31 PM, Coaly wrote: Impendingriot and I finished a game! Vote five!
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/48 4418
It's not really epic or anything... but it feels good to finish something.
I hope the link works the way it should...
Cool I like the achievements :)
No more animated sigs. :(
At 2/22/09 03:25 PM, Kirk-Cocaine wrote: Please remove your site from StumbleUpon, it's annoying stumbling on to sites I already know about. Thanks.
That's insane, I only just added that today ;P
I just bought Street Fighter 2 HD Remix and my thumb hurts =[ I suck at it but it's so much fun O_o I spent 3 hours playing with my friend, that's worth the £10 already :P
Sup, bitches :)
At 2/22/09 05:35 PM, liaaaam wrote: I just bought Street Fighter 2 HD Remix and my thumb hurts =[
I just got SFIV yesterday, and thankfully my thumbs are already calloused from where I work, otherwise they'd be blistered. Damn I forgot how hard stuff is to pull off in SF games in general.
On that note, any others here with the 360 version of SFIV? If so, hit me up, my gamertag is CrazedChihuahua (if you're not on my list already).
Wow, this is sincerely priceless, Wikipedia has proven to be totally unprofessional, seriously, I was just looking for the word V-Cam on google and this is delivered, what the hell, I don't know either to laugh or stare blankly at the screen, is wikipedia really THAT unprofessional?
LMAO...
Zach sucks...
At 2/23/09 04:24 PM, Zyphonee wrote: is wikipedia really THAT unprofessional?
They can't possibly catch everything like this... if that were in a print encyclopedia then that would be unprofessional, but with wikipedia's open source nature, you can't reasonably expect not to find things like this occasionally.
Meh, I rely on Wikipedia far too heavily, it's not let me down yet though.
At 2/23/09 05:33 PM, crushy wrote: Meh, I rely on Wikipedia far too heavily, it's not let me down yet though.
That you know...
New Site Design!!!
Yeah! I finally finished the new design for SuperFlashBros.net! I've gone the wordpress route, like so many before me, but we really did need a content management system better than 'ftp the index.html to the desktop, copy and paste a news post table, write new details, ftp it back to the site'
I'd appreciate views/opinions/criticism!
Tom-
At 2/23/09 04:24 PM, Zyphonee wrote: Wow, this is sincerely priceless, Wikipedia has proven to be totally unprofessional, seriously, I was just looking for the word V-Cam on google and this is delivered, what the hell, I don't know either to laugh or stare blankly at the screen, is wikipedia really THAT unprofessional?
LMAO...
Zach sucks...
well to be honest i don't think many people would bother to write articles about v-cam... I mean, after all it's just some user-created tool in Flash that not so many people even use. I find the more developped articles to be very precise and informative, and I think it's amazing that an open encyclopedia can be so accurate. And besides, although the article you linked does not seem to be very professionally written, it still describes what a V-cam does, in essence.
How would you have written it?
At 2/23/09 05:47 PM, The-Super-Flash-Bros wrote:At 2/23/09 05:33 PM, crushy wrote: Meh, I rely on Wikipedia far too heavily, it's not let me down yet though.That you know...
New Site Design!!!
Yeah! I finally finished the new design for SuperFlashBros.net! I've gone the wordpress route, like so many before me, but we really did need a content management system better than 'ftp the index.html to the desktop, copy and paste a news post table, write new details, ftp it back to the site'
I'd appreciate views/opinions/criticism!
http://www.superflashbros.net
Tom-
i went to highschool online and we had to use the same ftp system to upload all our homework. that was basically our first test, if we could understand that tedium, we could get into the real homework :P
the new site looks much better, its so fresh. and so clean-clean, but same good 'ol style. comments are nice until/if the forum ever goes in. is it a hassle to approve all them though?
SFB Site
On the store page, the navigational buttons are outta whack and on the home page, is this bit meant to be blank? I'm using FF2 btw. Other than it lloks good though.
At 2/23/09 06:00 PM, Kirk-Cocaine wrote: SFB Site
On the store page, the navigational buttons are outta whack and on the home page, is this bit meant to be blank? I'm using FF2 btw. Other than it lloks good though.
For me there's a swf there, advertising an upcoming game of theirs.
I figured out how to crash a TI-89 calculator
type this in:
[[a, b, c, d][e, f, g, h][i, j, k, l][m, n, o, p]]^-1
and hit enter.
It will never compute! (or maybe I just didnt wait long enough)
At 2/23/09 07:50 PM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote: I figured out how to crash a TI-89 calculator
It will never compute! (or maybe I just didnt wait long enough)
It took half a minute before mine gave up and wanted me to play Tetris on it instead.
Or it might have been me, not sure.
