Pardon the double-post, but I hit Post by accient. This is a long one, folks...
DEFCON Update:
I didn't lower the DEFCON last night because I fell asleep by accident, so I apologize. However, the Portal, despite it being slow for this time of day, can speed up instantly. Because of this, I will keep the DEFCON at DEFCON 3 until further notice. If the Portal shows major inactivity (which shouldn't happen due to the current trend), I will lower it to reflect the current state.
At 1/17/06 04:22 AM, Coop83 wrote:
Hello soilders. I have returned from my 2 days of leave to find that my promotion to Praporshchik is now imminent. I'm looking forward to a day of achievements.
*salutes*
Great to hear from you, Sergeant Major. I hope you make your promotion soon!
At 1/17/06 09:03 AM, nimmer wrote:
this is only half true.
Yes your voting power counts for 6.8 votes of people who didn't log in (vp 1).
BUT
your vote still counts only as one vote (1) on the 200 a movie needs to get in the portal.
so you have 1 vote with a weight of 6.8
I think what the original question was, Supreme Commander, SIR, is whether you actually get 6.8 votes of weight, or whether you get a rounded or truncated weight of either 7 or 6 (respectively). I would imagine, due to the system, that you get a pure 6.8 votes of weight, but that I cannot say for sure.
Could you possibly elaborate on this, sir?
At 1/17/06 01:38 AM, Dream_of_Duke wrote:
Something more about appointing Officers, sir! Eagle, what I suggest is to have a poll for the all the candidates for each potential position. If a candidate gets over half of the votes in a period of time, then he gets appointed. Isn't it a good idea?
BAD idea. for we have no way to controle the applicant's identity. there are people enough with a lot of alt accounts. so anyone could get into the staff providing he/she has enough aliases.
Very good point, sir. I really think that the officers I've appointed are really good for the position, simply due to the fact that I only appoint after I see the person is already serving in the position, just without an official title. The first (and best) example of this was Praporshchik Major_punk, who already had made a roster for us and planned on continuing to do it. He didn't ask for a position, he got one because of his efforts. In fact the only person I appointed before they had action was Second Lieutenant Ghost_Phantom, and that's only because he had extremely good credentials and I felt he was perfect for the position. Chalk it up to intuition, but he has turned out to be one of the best officers here.
this is not a popularity contest for as you can see in the portal anyone with enough friends (e.g. star syndicate) can make it into the portal. and it's not because you're popular that you're fit for the job. look at bush.
Exactly, sir. That's why the vote would be very rare in use. Also, I would probably just have a system where people PM me instead of a vote, if I felt the system would be abused.
At 1/17/06 11:16 AM, Coop83 wrote:
The one problem with saying no to self-petitioners is it is so easy to get around on a BBS. All you need to do is get someone who is your friend to nominate you and all of a sudden you are around it.
Not true, almost-Praporshchik (sorry, I just love to write the word "Praporshchik...") Coop83. When I said self-petitioners wouldn't get nominated, I meant if they mentioned themselves at ALL, they wouldn't be considered a position. By that standard, Captain Dream_of_Duke already can't make an officer position this time, because he mentioned himself. However, his case has been long-running and I wanted to see how the members feel about him being an officer, so he is an exception to the rule at this point.
Let that be a lesson to you all...if you want an officer position, asking me for one is a bad idea. Similar to how moderator status is given on the BBS, you do NOT get considered if you ask for one. These officer positions are to recognize those that contribute to the Portal and serve us well. It is also to make sure we have a good base of people working in vital positions, such as Barracks Relations or Barracks Records.
========================
Speaking of which, we have a position that currently is filled by a nonactive member. That is the Barracks Portal Operations Officer, Major General TITROTU. This is an important position that MUST be filled, but we have noone to fill it! I would ask everyone to consider petitions for current members. Like I said though, petitions should have people that have done something in regards to the position. The problem is, the following are who I consider the most qualified:
Second Lt. Ghost Phantom
SFC SlashFirestorm
PFC -Mitsubishi-
If you're an observant one, you'll notice ALL of these candidates are currently officers holding other positions! I would say that it'd be smart to appoint one of these three as the acting Portal Ops until someone else shines as a candidate. So, if the members could respond and answer the following:
- Should any of those three officers be appointed as active Portal Ops?
- Do you petition anyone else to take up Portal Ops?
- Do any of the three officers above want to consider changing their position?
I know it's a difficult position, but with the underlying threats that we have been investigating (note: they are currently classified), I feel having a Portal Ops is necessary. While I and the other officers have been working towards the cause, I feel an officer devoted to the position is necessary.
Please respond, members. I feel this is an imperative situation. Hooah!