At 4/10/25 10:55 AM, Edeshye wrote:(fictional or not)
Besides, lumping fiction and non fiction into the same category is pretty immature if you ask me. But then again. The same "agruments" are repeated for decades now. The dogs bark, but the caravan goes on.
At 4/11/25 01:45 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/10/25 10:55 AM, Edeshye wrote:(fictional or not)
Besides, lumping fiction and non fiction into the same category is pretty immature if you ask me. But then again. The same "agruments" are repeated for decades now. The dogs bark, but the caravan goes on.
Again, it was not only not an anthro or gajinka, it was also a baby Pokemon.
You just said 10 minutes ago you agreed with that statement, only to then backtrack and say it's immature and repetitive.
At 4/11/25 01:37 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/10/25 10:55 AM, Edeshye wrote:any porn with animals (fictional or not) should be banned imo, but well i don't make the rules
I agree. However, one thing to keep in mind. There is a difference between anthro/furries and animals. Animals don't talk, wear clothing or have opposable thumbs. And most importantly, they don't engage in distinctly human activities such as, I dunno, driving for instance?
I guess if you have to explain why it’s not zoophilia, it’s wrong enough
but again, i don’t make the rules
bro i'm tired
At 4/11/25 06:43 AM, Edeshye wrote:At 4/11/25 01:37 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/10/25 10:55 AM, Edeshye wrote:any porn with animals (fictional or not) should be banned imo, but well i don't make the rules
I agree. However, one thing to keep in mind. There is a difference between anthro/furries and animals. Animals don't talk, wear clothing or have opposable thumbs. And most importantly, they don't engage in distinctly human activities such as, I dunno, driving for instance?
I guess if you have to explain why it’s not zoophilia, it’s wrong enough
No. I have to explain because some people (usually the haters) aren't the brightest.
At 4/11/25 06:43 AM, Edeshye wrote:but again, i don’t make the rules
Let's leave the rule making to those who are competent and less prejudiced.
At 4/11/25 10:48 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/11/25 06:43 AM, Edeshye wrote:At 4/11/25 01:37 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/10/25 10:55 AM, Edeshye wrote:any porn with animals (fictional or not) should be banned imo, but well i don't make the rules
I agree. However, one thing to keep in mind. There is a difference between anthro/furries and animals. Animals don't talk, wear clothing or have opposable thumbs. And most importantly, they don't engage in distinctly human activities such as, I dunno, driving for instance?
I guess if you have to explain why it’s not zoophilia, it’s wrong enough
No. I have to explain because some people (usually the haters) aren't the brightest.At 4/11/25 06:43 AM, Edeshye wrote:
but again, i don’t make the rules
Let's leave the rule making to those who are competent and less prejudiced.
hey man i don't like furry stuff but i don't want to have a beef with you if you do.
you do you
bro i'm tired
Rated E and shows someone getting fucked. I didn't need to see this the A rating was off man 😭
You can see this in the Under Judgement movies.
edit: it's now banned YIPPEE https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/976039
Jeremy waz here
At 4/11/25 11:14 AM, Edeshye wrote:At 4/11/25 10:48 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/11/25 06:43 AM, Edeshye wrote:At 4/11/25 01:37 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/10/25 10:55 AM, Edeshye wrote:any porn with animals (fictional or not) should be banned imo, but well i don't make the rules
I agree. However, one thing to keep in mind. There is a difference between anthro/furries and animals. Animals don't talk, wear clothing or have opposable thumbs. And most importantly, they don't engage in distinctly human activities such as, I dunno, driving for instance?
I guess if you have to explain why it’s not zoophilia, it’s wrong enough
No. I have to explain because some people (usually the haters) aren't the brightest.At 4/11/25 06:43 AM, Edeshye wrote:
but again, i don’t make the rules
Let's leave the rule making to those who are competent and less prejudiced.
hey man i don't like furry stuff but i don't want to have a beef with you if you do.
you do you
If you don't like it, that's absolutely fine. But you literally said that it "should be banned", judging it solely by your personal opinion as well as fallacious prejudice, which to me came off as quite arrogant. Peace.
At 4/11/25 11:18 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/11/25 11:14 AM, Edeshye wrote:hey man i don't like furry stuff but i don't want to have a beef with you if you do.
you do you
If you don't like it, that's absolutely fine. But you literally said that it "should be banned", judging it solely by your personal opinion as well as fallacious prejudice, which to me came off as quite arrogant. Peace.
Enough, gentlemen. PM each other if you want to continue. Otherwise, this discussion ends now. Go enjoy the site an play nice.
At 4/8/25 11:03 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/7/25 09:15 PM, Edeshye wrote:At 4/7/25 08:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:Essentially an advertisement of an unethical GenAI app. Relies heavily on content generated with it.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/975559
I'm not sure if I should flag it.
It does rely a lot on AI…
oh man, the grey areas
And unsurprisingly, Teemo's response to (imho valid) criticism is the standard "durr hurr ironical use u stoopid" rebuttal.
Teemo is overreactive as hell. One dude said something funny on his movie then he replied with "retard banned" or something.
Jeremy waz here
At 4/11/25 11:24 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/8/25 11:03 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/7/25 09:15 PM, Edeshye wrote:At 4/7/25 08:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:Essentially an advertisement of an unethical GenAI app. Relies heavily on content generated with it.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/975559
I'm not sure if I should flag it.
It does rely a lot on AI…
oh man, the grey areas
And unsurprisingly, Teemo's response to (imho valid) criticism is the standard "durr hurr ironical use u stoopid" rebuttal.
Teemo is overreactive as hell. One dude said something funny on his movie then he replied with "retard banned" or something.
If you thought his NG replies were bad, take a look at his YouTube.
Jeremy waz here
At 4/11/25 11:34 AM, CrimsonKero wrote:At 4/11/25 11:24 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/8/25 11:03 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/7/25 09:15 PM, Edeshye wrote:At 4/7/25 08:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:Essentially an advertisement of an unethical GenAI app. Relies heavily on content generated with it.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/975559
I'm not sure if I should flag it.
It does rely a lot on AI…
oh man, the grey areas
And unsurprisingly, Teemo's response to (imho valid) criticism is the standard "durr hurr ironical use u stoopid" rebuttal.
Teemo is overreactive as hell. One dude said something funny on his movie then he replied with "retard banned" or something.
If you thought his NG replies were bad, take a look at his YouTube.
I'm scared that AI will fly everywhere in my recommendations just from seeing it (i hate ai, we all hate ai). send me some screenshots.
Jeremy waz here
At 4/11/25 11:34 AM, EwanDog wrote:Also, I'm new here, hi! :D
Welcome to the EGB. Cheers from Australia.
At 4/11/25 11:22 AM, Exedor wrote:At 4/11/25 11:18 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/11/25 11:14 AM, Edeshye wrote:hey man i don't like furry stuff but i don't want to have a beef with you if you do.
you do you
If you don't like it, that's absolutely fine. But you literally said that it "should be banned", judging it solely by your personal opinion as well as fallacious prejudice, which to me came off as quite arrogant. Peace.
Enough, gentlemen. PM each other if you want to continue. Otherwise, this discussion ends now. Go enjoy the site an play nice.
bro i'm tired
At 4/11/25 11:36 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/11/25 11:34 AM, CrimsonKero wrote:At 4/11/25 11:24 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/8/25 11:03 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/7/25 09:15 PM, Edeshye wrote:At 4/7/25 08:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:Essentially an advertisement of an unethical GenAI app. Relies heavily on content generated with it.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/975559
I'm not sure if I should flag it.
It does rely a lot on AI…
oh man, the grey areas
And unsurprisingly, Teemo's response to (imho valid) criticism is the standard "durr hurr ironical use u stoopid" rebuttal.
Teemo is overreactive as hell. One dude said something funny on his movie then he replied with "retard banned" or something.
If you thought his NG replies were bad, take a look at his YouTube.
I'm scared that AI will fly everywhere in my recommendations just from seeing it (i hate ai, we all hate ai). send me some screenshots.
Well, Teemo is a bit overhated to be fair. Most of the negative backlash against his animations comes from the people who are openly against all types of NSFW. I personally don't have a problem with NSFW. But, Teemo's animations' quality has vastly declined lately. The stuff started to look half assed and rushed. But the use of GenAI as filler was the point where he crossed the line for me.
At 4/11/25 11:44 AM, CrimsonKero wrote:At 4/11/25 11:34 AM, EwanDog wrote:Also, I'm new here, hi! :D
Welcome to the EGB. Cheers from Australia.
I live in Australia too haha
Jeremy waz here
At 4/11/25 11:45 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/11/25 11:36 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/11/25 11:34 AM, CrimsonKero wrote:At 4/11/25 11:24 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/8/25 11:03 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/7/25 09:15 PM, Edeshye wrote:At 4/7/25 08:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:Essentially an advertisement of an unethical GenAI app. Relies heavily on content generated with it.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/975559
I'm not sure if I should flag it.
It does rely a lot on AI…
oh man, the grey areas
And unsurprisingly, Teemo's response to (imho valid) criticism is the standard "durr hurr ironical use u stoopid" rebuttal.
Teemo is overreactive as hell. One dude said something funny on his movie then he replied with "retard banned" or something.
If you thought his NG replies were bad, take a look at his YouTube.
I'm scared that AI will fly everywhere in my recommendations just from seeing it (i hate ai, we all hate ai). send me some screenshots.
Well, Teemo is a bit overhated to be fair. Most of the negative backlash against his animations comes from the people who are openly against all types of NSFW. I personally don't have a problem with NSFW. But, Teemo's animations' quality has vastly declined lately. The stuff started to look half assed and rushed. But the use of GenAI as filler was the point where he crossed the line for me.
Don't worry, he's just following a trend. I promise he won't pull a Foamy and do it again I swear!
At 4/11/25 11:45 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/11/25 11:36 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/11/25 11:34 AM, CrimsonKero wrote:At 4/11/25 11:24 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/8/25 11:03 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/7/25 09:15 PM, Edeshye wrote:At 4/7/25 08:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:Essentially an advertisement of an unethical GenAI app. Relies heavily on content generated with it.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/975559
I'm not sure if I should flag it.
It does rely a lot on AI…
oh man, the grey areas
And unsurprisingly, Teemo's response to (imho valid) criticism is the standard "durr hurr ironical use u stoopid" rebuttal.
Teemo is overreactive as hell. One dude said something funny on his movie then he replied with "retard banned" or something.
If you thought his NG replies were bad, take a look at his YouTube.
I'm scared that AI will fly everywhere in my recommendations just from seeing it (i hate ai, we all hate ai). send me some screenshots.
Well, Teemo is a bit overhated to be fair. Most of the negative backlash against his animations comes from the people who are openly against all types of NSFW. I personally don't have a problem with NSFW. But, Teemo's animations' quality has vastly declined lately. The stuff started to look half assed and rushed. But the use of GenAI as filler was the point where he crossed the line for me.
AI + Newgrounds = you pissed us off.
Jeremy waz here
At 4/11/25 11:47 AM, CrimsonKero wrote:At 4/11/25 11:45 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/11/25 11:36 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/11/25 11:34 AM, CrimsonKero wrote:At 4/11/25 11:24 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/8/25 11:03 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/7/25 09:15 PM, Edeshye wrote:At 4/7/25 08:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:Essentially an advertisement of an unethical GenAI app. Relies heavily on content generated with it.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/975559
I'm not sure if I should flag it.
It does rely a lot on AI…
oh man, the grey areas
And unsurprisingly, Teemo's response to (imho valid) criticism is the standard "durr hurr ironical use u stoopid" rebuttal.
Teemo is overreactive as hell. One dude said something funny on his movie then he replied with "retard banned" or something.
If you thought his NG replies were bad, take a look at his YouTube.
I'm scared that AI will fly everywhere in my recommendations just from seeing it (i hate ai, we all hate ai). send me some screenshots.
Well, Teemo is a bit overhated to be fair. Most of the negative backlash against his animations comes from the people who are openly against all types of NSFW. I personally don't have a problem with NSFW. But, Teemo's animations' quality has vastly declined lately. The stuff started to look half assed and rushed. But the use of GenAI as filler was the point where he crossed the line for me.
Don't worry, he's just following a trend. I promise he won't pull a Foamy and do it again I swear!
pfft lmao "he's following a trend" aren't there other popular trends right now? AI is shit. Do the human-made trends teemo lmfao
Jeremy waz here
At 4/11/25 11:58 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/11/25 11:47 AM, CrimsonKero wrote:At 4/11/25 11:45 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/11/25 11:36 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/11/25 11:34 AM, CrimsonKero wrote:At 4/11/25 11:24 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/8/25 11:03 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/7/25 09:15 PM, Edeshye wrote:At 4/7/25 08:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:Essentially an advertisement of an unethical GenAI app. Relies heavily on content generated with it.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/975559
I'm not sure if I should flag it.
It does rely a lot on AI…
oh man, the grey areas
And unsurprisingly, Teemo's response to (imho valid) criticism is the standard "durr hurr ironical use u stoopid" rebuttal.
Teemo is overreactive as hell. One dude said something funny on his movie then he replied with "retard banned" or something.
If you thought his NG replies were bad, take a look at his YouTube.
I'm scared that AI will fly everywhere in my recommendations just from seeing it (i hate ai, we all hate ai). send me some screenshots.
Well, Teemo is a bit overhated to be fair. Most of the negative backlash against his animations comes from the people who are openly against all types of NSFW. I personally don't have a problem with NSFW. But, Teemo's animations' quality has vastly declined lately. The stuff started to look half assed and rushed. But the use of GenAI as filler was the point where he crossed the line for me.
Don't worry, he's just following a trend. I promise he won't pull a Foamy and do it again I swear!
pfft lmao "he's following a trend" aren't there other popular trends right now? AI is shit. Do the human-made trends teemo lmfao
Spoke too soon! Turns out his latest upload on YouTube has this label on it (no sign on NG)
He is doing Foamy-AI backgrounds. Truly living up to the Teemo Vs All name.
Also vocals..
That confirms my theory that Teemo wants to pump out those videos as quickly as possible with minimal effort. It wouldn't be a big deal if that was just a casual meme activity for fun, but he's putting this type of stuff on Patreon behind a paywall. If I were his supporter, I would demand something that's anything but AI slop. Lame.
At 4/11/25 12:33 PM, CrimsonKero wrote:At 4/11/25 11:58 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/11/25 11:47 AM, CrimsonKero wrote:At 4/11/25 11:45 AM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/11/25 11:36 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/11/25 11:34 AM, CrimsonKero wrote:At 4/11/25 11:24 AM, EwanDog wrote:At 4/8/25 11:03 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 4/7/25 09:15 PM, Edeshye wrote:At 4/7/25 08:57 PM, Czyszy wrote:Essentially an advertisement of an unethical GenAI app. Relies heavily on content generated with it.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/975559
I'm not sure if I should flag it.
It does rely a lot on AI…
oh man, the grey areas
And unsurprisingly, Teemo's response to (imho valid) criticism is the standard "durr hurr ironical use u stoopid" rebuttal.
Teemo is overreactive as hell. One dude said something funny on his movie then he replied with "retard banned" or something.
If you thought his NG replies were bad, take a look at his YouTube.
I'm scared that AI will fly everywhere in my recommendations just from seeing it (i hate ai, we all hate ai). send me some screenshots.
Well, Teemo is a bit overhated to be fair. Most of the negative backlash against his animations comes from the people who are openly against all types of NSFW. I personally don't have a problem with NSFW. But, Teemo's animations' quality has vastly declined lately. The stuff started to look half assed and rushed. But the use of GenAI as filler was the point where he crossed the line for me.
Don't worry, he's just following a trend. I promise he won't pull a Foamy and do it again I swear!
pfft lmao "he's following a trend" aren't there other popular trends right now? AI is shit. Do the human-made trends teemo lmfao
Spoke too soon! Turns out his latest upload on YouTube has this label on it (no sign on NG)
He is doing Foamy-AI backgrounds. Truly living up to the Teemo Vs All name.
Also vocals..
Wouldn't be surprised if Teemo is AI.
Jeremy waz here
