At 12/31/24 05:14 PM, Edeshye wrote:At 12/31/24 04:56 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:At 12/31/24 04:34 PM, Edeshye wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkoZhAvcg6o (NSFW, I guess?)
As far as I can tell, this game existed since 2023, and the newly uploaded one is version 2.5, meaning they skipped 2.0 from the video. I'm willing to bet that they are both stolen.
word (although i think a "spanking kids butts" game with "mild nudity" is weird enough to get deleted)
Question is why would someone named ShioriShiragami post a game that's exclusively in Chinese? Okay, I get most people don't know the difference between Chinese and Japanese, but Japanese games tend to use English words and also have Katakana and Hiragana, two unique writing systems that is adapted from Chinese. Chinese on the other hand isn't the same as Japanese, because there's Traditional and Simplified Chinese, which are two ways of writing Chinese. Kanji/Hanzi are not exactly good ways of distinguishing this because unless you understand either language, it's impossible for foreigners and/or people who have basic grasps to tell, hell I'm one of those people. But I'm certain this is Chinese because nowhere in the game uses Hiragana or Katakana. Furthermore, there's no real evidence of the author being the one who made this game. In both uploaded games, they come from QK100.com, which if you check the site right now, it can't be accessed due to the website not having an ICP filing, which more or less confirms this site is from China. Now, here's a real question; why would someone who's username uses both a Japanese name and surname upload a game that's Chinese and doesn't credit them as the one who made the game, but rather a Chinese site? "制作者" does refer to a developer regardless if it was Chinese or Japanese and by checking QK100.com on Flashpoint, there are games from the site, albeit they're in Chinese. Sure, you could argue this person could've worked within qk100.com, but unless there is evidence to prove this is the case, I'm flagging these games as stolen since the author seems really suspicious and nothing connects to the author being the one who made the submission(s).