No animation, reupload of unpublished submission:
No animation, reupload of unpublished submission:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/947824 (A-rated)
Triplicate reuploads.
No animation
At 9/12/24 06:10 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/947675
There's like 1 second of animation and 40 seconds of various memes and stock images in slideshow format. I'm counting this as no animation..
Image slideshow again.
<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948016
Fetish content rated M
At 9/15/24 04:48 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948016
Fetish content rated M
Having a fetish or kink isn't against site policies.
Copyrighted music
At 9/15/24 05:27 AM, slugrapist wrote:At 9/15/24 04:48 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948016Having a fetish or kink isn't against site policies.
Fetish content rated M
You're correct. 'Having a fetish/kink' isn't against the 'site policies', and your comment would be completely fine... if that was what BlueMonday was indicating in his comment, which it isn't.
What BlueMonday was indicating is that the submission that he was talking about is 'misrated' (content 'age-rated' wrongly with the wrong 'age-label') due to it's content, which in this case, is supposed to be 'fetishist' content, and should be probably marked as 'A' (Adult) rated content instead of 'M' (Mature) rated content. That was what BlueMonday was exactly indicating in his message. He wasn't complaining about the fetishist content of the animation, but of it's misrating/wrong-classification.
Please, make sure to read messages a good 'couple of times' to make sure what they say and what they're implying before answering to them to avoid future 'misunderstandings' with other people.
Have a good day o7.
At 9/15/24 06:25 AM, Gekkotsuki wrote:At 9/15/24 05:27 AM, slugrapist wrote:At 9/15/24 04:48 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948016Having a fetish or kink isn't against site policies.
Fetish content rated M
You're correct. 'Having a fetish/kink' isn't against the 'site policies', and your comment would be completely fine... if that was what BlueMonday was indicating in his comment, which it isn't.
What BlueMonday was indicating is that the submission that he was talking about is 'misrated' (content 'age-rated' wrongly with the wrong 'age-label') due to it's content, which in this case, is supposed to be 'fetishist' content, and should be probably marked as 'A' (Adult) rated content instead of 'M' (Mature) rated content. That was what BlueMonday was exactly indicating in his message. He wasn't complaining about the fetishist content of the animation, but of it's misrating/wrong-classification.
Please, make sure to read comments a good 'couple of times' to make sure what they say and what they're implying before answering to them to avoid future 'misunderstandings' with other people.
Have a good day o7.
At 9/15/24 05:27 AM, slugrapist wrote:At 9/15/24 04:48 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948016Having a fetish or kink isn't against site policies.
Fetish content rated M
According to the Movie Guidelines: Technically it's more of a "improper rating" type situation that doesn't lead to any removals.
If your animation is fetish content, please just mark at as adult; people get unhappy when fetish content appears in the non-adult listings.
CS - Musician, animator, and nostalgia enthusiast since 2020.
- they/she - 🏳️⚧️
<SHOCK VIDEO>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948102
No animation. Pretty sure its stolen, but I am not gonna try and find out
I recall seeing this somewhere else - the unmatching thumbnail and this being the uploader's sole movie makes me strongly suspect this is stolen. If anyone finds source, please tell me.
At 9/15/24 02:28 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948095
I recall seeing this somewhere else - the unmatching thumbnail and this being the uploader's sole movie makes me strongly suspect this is stolen. If anyone finds source, please tell me.
it is stolen. i searched "boykisser dies animation" and (while not the source - my search didnt turn that up and i dont care enough to be more cursory) this popped up from about a year back
At 9/15/24 02:37 PM, wolfatthedoor wrote:At 9/15/24 02:28 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948095
I recall seeing this somewhere else - the unmatching thumbnail and this being the uploader's sole movie makes me strongly suspect this is stolen. If anyone finds source, please tell me.
it is stolen. i searched "boykisser dies animation" and (while not the source - my search didnt turn that up and i dont care enough to be more cursory) this popped up from about a year back
Thanks, man.
Can anyone help me out here? This game looks remarkably like several others that have come through the portal recently. Is this a new kind of template game?
At 9/16/24 02:10 PM, guthrie wrote:Can anyone help me out here? This game looks remarkably like several others that have come through the portal recently. Is this a new kind of template game?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948219
At 9/16/24 02:23 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:At 9/16/24 02:10 PM, guthrie wrote:Can anyone help me out here? This game looks remarkably like several others that have come through the portal recently. Is this a new kind of template game?https://gdevelop.io/game-example/free/wave-defense-shooter
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948219
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mckuSpr8vio
There it is. Thanks for the assist!
<MISRATED - VORE>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948290
Fetish art rated M
No animation - screen recording
<EXPLICIT/ABUSIVE?>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948433
No animation
Gameplay footage showcasing a submitter's game mod - flag, blam or save?
<EXPLICIT?>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948441
No animation - speedpaint
At 9/18/24 11:16 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<EXPLICIT/ABUSIVE?>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948433
No animation
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948432
Gameplay footage showcasing a submitter's game mod - flag, blam or save?
While the new sprites are nice, there's not enough original content here to keep.
At 9/15/24 06:25 AM, Gekkotsuki wrote:At 9/15/24 05:27 AM, slugrapist wrote:At 9/15/24 04:48 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948016Having a fetish or kink isn't against site policies.
Fetish content rated M
You're correct. 'Having a fetish/kink' isn't against the 'site policies', and your comment would be completely fine... if that was what BlueMonday was indicating in his comment, which it isn't.
What BlueMonday was indicating is that the submission that he was talking about is 'misrated' (content 'age-rated' wrongly with the wrong 'age-label') due to it's content, which in this case, is supposed to be 'fetishist' content, and should be probably marked as 'A' (Adult) rated content instead of 'M' (Mature) rated content. That was what BlueMonday was exactly indicating in his message. He wasn't complaining about the fetishist content of the animation, but of it's misrating/wrong-classification.
Please, make sure to read messages a good 'couple of times' to make sure what they say and what they're implying before answering to them to avoid future 'misunderstandings' with other people.
Have a good day o7.
Honestly, is a character having a wedgie really worth an A-Rating though? (Which in itself isn't even a fetish.)
At 9/18/24 07:58 PM, SolarFoxProductions wrote:At 9/15/24 06:25 AM, Gekkotsuki wrote:At 9/15/24 05:27 AM, slugrapist wrote:At 9/15/24 04:48 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - FETISH>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948016Having a fetish or kink isn't against site policies.
Fetish content rated M
You're correct. 'Having a fetish/kink' isn't against the 'site policies', and your comment would be completely fine... if that was what BlueMonday was indicating in his comment, which it isn't.
What BlueMonday was indicating is that the submission that he was talking about is 'misrated' (content 'age-rated' wrongly with the wrong 'age-label') due to it's content, which in this case, is supposed to be 'fetishist' content, and should be probably marked as 'A' (Adult) rated content instead of 'M' (Mature) rated content. That was what BlueMonday was exactly indicating in his message. He wasn't complaining about the fetishist content of the animation, but of it's misrating/wrong-classification.
Please, make sure to read messages a good 'couple of times' to make sure what they say and what they're implying before answering to them to avoid future 'misunderstandings' with other people.
Have a good day o7.
Honestly, is a character having a wedgie really worth an A-Rating though? (Which in itself isn't even a fetish.)
Well, under my 'humble' opinion, yes, but it would depend on over some certain 'conditions', though, such as, for example;
-Is the character/are the characters involved on the mentioned animation/drawing without any kind of 'clothes' while they're suffering of the wedgie (asides of the underpants which with they're suffering from the wedgie itself, of course)? If so, then, the answer is yes, since apart of the 'considered-fetish' action, the animation would also fall under the category of 'nudity', which content should be marked as 'A' rated content...
- Are the character/characters involved on the mentioned animation/drawing doing some kind of 'satisfied', perhaps 'aroused' expression while are they suffering from the wedgie? If so, then, yes, since in that case the author of the mentioned animation/drawing is already treating the wedgie (a painful, humilliating experience) as an 'exciting', 'pleasant' experience, and in result, it should be marked as 'A' rated content...
...If the animation/drawing previously mentioned 'meets' any of those 'characteristics' that I've mentioned as an example, then, the answer will be always a resounding yes for me, since though the wedgie itself isn't exactly considered as a fetish/kink, it could actually be considered as one itself, depending on the orientation that whoever actually gives to it under the context that it's used on, so, in definitive; yes, at some certain point, I'm sure that it would be actually 'worth' to mark it as 'A' rated content instead of just leaving it as an 'M'.
That's my opinion on the subject. I hope that I've made myself clear and that I had resolved your doubt (somehow), in the process o7.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948513 (NSFW)
Gameplay footage. No animation
Comic dub over static images
<MISRATED - EXPLICIT>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948570
Porn rated M
<WHAT THE FUCK>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948572
Porn involving a minor being aged up - not 100% sure its flaggable, but I'm going with gut instinct and flagging anyway
UPDATE: Discovered this movie's central character is underage (https://bubbleguppies.fandom.com/wiki/Oona) - its absolutely flaggable
At 9/19/24 02:02 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - EXPLICIT>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948570
Porn rated M
<WHAT THE FUCK>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948572
Porn involving a minor being aged up - not 100% sure its flaggable, but I'm going with gut instinct and flagging anyway
UPDATE: Discovered this movie's central character is underage (https://bubbleguppies.fandom.com/wiki/Oona) - its absolutely flaggable
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948597 (explicit) is this flaggable too because it’s reuploaded again
At 9/19/24 04:52 PM, Poligeektoons wrote:At 9/19/24 02:02 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:<MISRATED - EXPLICIT>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948570https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948597 (explicit) is this flaggable too because it’s reuploaded again
Porn rated M
<WHAT THE FUCK>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/948572
Porn involving a minor being aged up - not 100% sure its flaggable, but I'm going with gut instinct and flagging anyway
UPDATE: Discovered this movie's central character is underage (https://bubbleguppies.fandom.com/wiki/Oona) - its absolutely flaggable
If you've got evidence its a reupload, I'd consider it flaggable. Check through your voting history, see if you can find the original upload in there.
Anyways:
No animation - edited sprites
No animation - slideshow