HO HO HOPE you become a Newgrounds Supporter this year!
We're working hard to give you the best site possible, but we have bills to pay and community support is vital to keep things going and growing. Thank you for considering!
Just glitchin' about.
Some abusive comments, plus some of them say it's ai generated, I don't know, please check it out.
Thanks for the info, I'm still kinda new at this and trying my best
At 6/23/24 11:02 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936078
A Comic Dub
they had already placed it
ElRandomGMD (aka RandomToons)
ok there we go
Slideshows
At 6/23/24 10:08 PM, YendorNG wrote:
Maybe 10% of this video is AI...
ACKSHually. User YendorNG, while my original report was of a content rating issue, i thought it noteworthy to mention the musik is also AI, I did NOT mention the complication of the track being an actual existing song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZtETspBs) however.
If you ask me why. For one, i don't know if we actually care about such things in movies.
for two. i dont care. Thirdly would be the complication of using AI to duet a song. for your movie. is it against the rules? If the song is copywritten, does ai make it a transformative work? Does anyone even fucking care?! who knows! How about you tell me.
Oh yea: ps. --
Don't even think FOR ONE SECOND you can flag my review, i type and run everything i say and type through a sophisticated neural network consisting of thirteen million transistors for the best and most safe for work responses possible. it is literally impossible for me to be against the rules! So unless you want to lose whistle points and seem like a whistleless buffoon, the thought should be rejected.....personally. And THAT goes for the rest of you lowlives aswell. hmpt.
XDeeZeroZero4Two-thousand six.
oh boy somebody pissed
At 6/23/24 11:32 PM, XD0042006 wrote:At 6/23/24 10:08 PM, YendorNG wrote:
Maybe 10% of this video is AI...
ACKSHually. User YendorNG, while my original report was of a content rating issue, i thought it noteworthy to mention the musik is also AI, I did NOT mention the complication of the track being an actual existing song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZtETspBs) however.
If you ask me why. For one, i don't know if we actually care about such things in movies.
for two. i dont care. Thirdly would be the complication of using AI to duet a song. for your movie. is it against the rules? If the song is copywritten, does ai make it a transformative work? Does anyone even fucking care?! who knows! How about you tell me.
Oh yea: ps. --
Don't even think FOR ONE SECOND you can flag my review, i type and run everything i say and type through a sophisticated neural network consisting of thirteen million transistors for the best and most safe for work responses possible. it is literally impossible for me to be against the rules! So unless you want to lose whistle points and seem like a whistleless buffoon, the thought should be rejected.....personally. And THAT goes for the rest of you lowlives aswell. hmpt.
At 6/23/24 11:32 PM, XD0042006 wrote:At 6/23/24 10:08 PM, YendorNG wrote:
Maybe 10% of this video is AI...
ACKSHually. User YendorNG, while my original report was of a content rating issue, i thought it noteworthy to mention the musik is also AI, I did NOT mention the complication of the track being an actual existing song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZtETspBs) however.
If you ask me why. For one, i don't know if we actually care about such things in movies.
for two. i dont care. Thirdly would be the complication of using AI to duet a song. for your movie. is it against the rules? If the song is copywritten, does ai make it a transformative work? Does anyone even fucking care?! who knows! How about you tell me.
Oh yea: ps. --
Don't even think FOR ONE SECOND you can flag my review, i type and run everything i say and type through a sophisticated neural network consisting of thirteen million transistors for the best and most safe for work responses possible. it is literally impossible for me to be against the rules! So unless you want to lose whistle points and seem like a whistleless buffoon, the thought should be rejected.....personally. And THAT goes for the rest of you lowlives aswell. hmpt.
You do know that coming in here and poking around with an attitude gets you noticed by others, right?
At 6/24/24 12:03 AM, tox wrote:At 6/23/24 11:32 PM, XD0042006 wrote:At 6/23/24 10:08 PM, YendorNG wrote:
Maybe 10% of this video is AI...
ACKSHually. User YendorNG, while my original report was of a content rating issue, i thought it noteworthy to mention the musik is also AI, I did NOT mention the complication of the track being an actual existing song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZtETspBs) however.
If you ask me why. For one, i don't know if we actually care about such things in movies.
for two. i dont care. Thirdly would be the complication of using AI to duet a song. for your movie. is it against the rules? If the song is copywritten, does ai make it a transformative work? Does anyone even fucking care?! who knows! How about you tell me.
Oh yea: ps. --
Don't even think FOR ONE SECOND you can flag my review, i type and run everything i say and type through a sophisticated neural network consisting of thirteen million transistors for the best and most safe for work responses possible. it is literally impossible for me to be against the rules! So unless you want to lose whistle points and seem like a whistleless buffoon, the thought should be rejected.....personally. And THAT goes for the rest of you lowlives aswell. hmpt.
You do know that coming in here and poking around with an attitude gets you noticed by others, right?
What have I stated?
At 6/24/24 12:22 AM, Superboi68 wrote:At 6/24/24 12:03 AM, tox wrote:At 6/23/24 11:32 PM, XD0042006 wrote:At 6/23/24 10:08 PM, YendorNG wrote:
Maybe 10% of this video is AI...
ACKSHually. User YendorNG, while my original report was of a content rating issue, i thought it noteworthy to mention the musik is also AI, I did NOT mention the complication of the track being an actual existing song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZtETspBs) however.
If you ask me why. For one, i don't know if we actually care about such things in movies.
for two. i dont care. Thirdly would be the complication of using AI to duet a song. for your movie. is it against the rules? If the song is copywritten, does ai make it a transformative work? Does anyone even fucking care?! who knows! How about you tell me.
Oh yea: ps. --
Don't even think FOR ONE SECOND you can flag my review, i type and run everything i say and type through a sophisticated neural network consisting of thirteen million transistors for the best and most safe for work responses possible. it is literally impossible for me to be against the rules! So unless you want to lose whistle points and seem like a whistleless buffoon, the thought should be rejected.....personally. And THAT goes for the rest of you lowlives aswell. hmpt.
You do know that coming in here and poking around with an attitude gets you noticed by others, right?
What have I started?
At 6/24/24 12:03 AM, tox wrote:At 6/23/24 11:32 PM, XD0042006 wrote:At 6/23/24 10:08 PM, YendorNG wrote:
Maybe 10% of this video is AI...
ACKSHually. User YendorNG, while my original report was of a content rating issue, i thought it noteworthy to mention the musik is also AI, I did NOT mention the complication of the track being an actual existing song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZtETspBs) however.
If you ask me why. For one, i don't know if we actually care about such things in movies.
for two. i dont care. Thirdly would be the complication of using AI to duet a song. for your movie. is it against the rules? If the song is copywritten, does ai make it a transformative work? Does anyone even fucking care?! who knows! How about you tell me.
Oh yea: ps. --
Don't even think FOR ONE SECOND you can flag my review, i type and run everything i say and type through a sophisticated neural network consisting of thirteen million transistors for the best and most safe for work responses possible. it is literally impossible for me to be against the rules! So unless you want to lose whistle points and seem like a whistleless buffoon, the thought should be rejected.....personally. And THAT goes for the rest of you lowlives aswell. hmpt.
You do know that coming in here and poking around with an attitude gets you noticed by others, right?
I feel like I'm missing something here.
It's all shits and giggles until someone giggles and shits.
At 6/24/24 02:26 AM, Big-Boss wrote:At 6/24/24 12:03 AM, tox wrote:At 6/23/24 11:32 PM, XD0042006 wrote:At 6/23/24 10:08 PM, YendorNG wrote:
Maybe 10% of this video is AI...
ACKSHually. User YendorNG, while my original report was of a content rating issue, i thought it noteworthy to mention the musik is also AI, I did NOT mention the complication of the track being an actual existing song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZtETspBs) however.
If you ask me why. For one, i don't know if we actually care about such things in movies.
for two. i dont care. Thirdly would be the complication of using AI to duet a song. for your movie. is it against the rules? If the song is copywritten, does ai make it a transformative work? Does anyone even fucking care?! who knows! How about you tell me.
Oh yea: ps. --
Don't even think FOR ONE SECOND you can flag my review, i type and run everything i say and type through a sophisticated neural network consisting of thirteen million transistors for the best and most safe for work responses possible. it is literally impossible for me to be against the rules! So unless you want to lose whistle points and seem like a whistleless buffoon, the thought should be rejected.....personally. And THAT goes for the rest of you lowlives aswell. hmpt.
You do know that coming in here and poking around with an attitude gets you noticed by others, right?
I feel like I'm missing something here.
non members poke at an artist out in the wild, the piece is taken down, non members post about it here, the artist comes in and posts somewhat like a puffed up scared cat, others react
Sir
also good to see you Big-Boss,
Geometry Dash gameplay footage; no animation
Seems to be a pirated upload of "Boonie Bears: Back to Earth", a 2022 Chinese children's sci fi film.
Just glitchin' about.
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/24/24 02:37 AM, tox wrote:
non members poke at an artist out in the wild, the piece is taken down, non members post about it here, the artist comes in and posts somewhat like a puffed up scared cat, others react
Sir
huhg thats not what happened? What happened was a user submitted content using ai in their work (amongst incorrect content rating& presumably copyrighted music), OTHER users made comments concerning AI and more importantly, brought attention to the submission's reviews. This is where I, xd002hwekjrh3, come to elegantly correct the situation using otherworldly logic and undeniable evidence. That exists in the form of my previous comment, for your reading pleasure. Which I advise you to reread!
As for the submission itself, if I had to guess, it was removed bc of copyrighted mysic. While I couldn't find licensing on the official youtube page, I did find the track listed on apple music. which should justify the mod's removal..... THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED.
XDeeZeroZero4Two-thousand six.
At 6/24/24 05:38 AM, XD0042006 wrote:huhg thats not what happened? What happened was a user submitted content using ai in their work (amongst incorrect content rating& presumably copyrighted music), OTHER users made comments concerning AI and more importantly, brought attention to the submission's reviews. This is where I, xd002hwekjrh3, come to elegantly correct the situation using otherworldly logic and undeniable evidence. That exists in the form of my previous comment, for your reading pleasure. Which I advise you to reread!
...You do realize that pointing out what's illegal is illegal itself in the Review Guidelines right?
Here's another submission:
Uses this copyrighted song, Hex Cougar - Internet Crush.
At 6/24/24 08:21 AM, BickerySebastian wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936122
Uses this copyrighted song, Hex Cougar - Internet Crush.
I ended up checking a bit deeper on that - I couldn't find the track on Hex Cougar's Spotify, and his Soundcloud's been completely wiped. The song eluded me on his Apple Music, too.
I'm not 100% sure what caused that, but I suspect that's gonna kill your case for it getting taken down.
It seems the uploader is using this submission to try and call out a specific member of the object show community for grooming? Either way, I highly doubt this should be allowed in the portal, but I'm unsure of how to go about flagging something like this. Please advise.
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/24/24 10:38 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936194
It seems the uploader is using this submission to try and call out a specific member of the object show community for grooming? Either way, I highly doubt this should be allowed in the portal, but I'm unsure of how to go about flagging something like this. Please advise.
I'm certain you can use the Spam flag for this, stating it to be harassment in the notes.
True or not, this kinda stuff's a slam-dunk terms of use violation: https://www.newgrounds.com/wiki/help-information/terms-of-use
At 6/24/24 10:45 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 6/24/24 10:38 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936194I'm certain you can use the Spam flag for this, stating it to be harassment in the notes.
It seems the uploader is using this submission to try and call out a specific member of the object show community for grooming? Either way, I highly doubt this should be allowed in the portal, but I'm unsure of how to go about flagging something like this. Please advise.
True or not, this kinda stuff's a slam-dunk terms of use violation: https://www.newgrounds.com/wiki/help-information/terms-of-use
Just got nuked. That actually has to be the quickest EGB post to removal time I've ever seen.
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/24/24 10:50 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:At 6/24/24 10:45 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 6/24/24 10:38 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936194I'm certain you can use the Spam flag for this, stating it to be harassment in the notes.
It seems the uploader is using this submission to try and call out a specific member of the object show community for grooming? Either way, I highly doubt this should be allowed in the portal, but I'm unsure of how to go about flagging something like this. Please advise.
True or not, this kinda stuff's a slam-dunk terms of use violation: https://www.newgrounds.com/wiki/help-information/terms-of-use
Just got nuked. That actually has to be the quickest EGB post to removal time I've ever seen.
AnimatedWorld was making some pretty serious allegations - even if he was dead on, this ain't the place for it.
Even from a pragmatic standpoint, Twitter and YouTube will both give AW's allegations much more reach than here.
No animation - still image w/ text
No animation - still image
<MISRATED - EXPLICIT>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936271
Rated M despite nudity, sexual content
Slideshow of AI-generated imagery
This video is being used to spread allegations of "cybercrime" against a DeviantArt user, in a similar vein to the video I posted to the thread yesterday.
Just glitchin' about.
At 6/25/24 02:47 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936301
This video is being used to spread allegations of "cybercrime" against a DeviantArt user, in a similar vein to the video I posted to the thread yesterday.
I know that this post hasn't to do with anything, but.
Chloe May has been harassing everyone on Newgrounds and DeviantArt, people are telling the nice truth about her and her awful behavior. Trolls must go to jail, people should NOT be okay defending Chloe May. Chloe makes alt accounts every single time and played a horrible victim card when people were falling on a trap that she "didn't do anything wrong".
I have a feeling that cops are okay with her bullying behavior. Not okay at all!
Where else am I? Sheezy.Art ꟾ Geometry Dash ꟾ Reddit ꟾ BlueSky
AKA fe3l1ngsk1lled, Skilled, SkilledFeller... :3
At 6/25/24 02:56 AM, SkilledFella wrote:At 6/25/24 02:47 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936301
This video is being used to spread allegations of "cybercrime" against a DeviantArt user, in a similar vein to the video I posted to the thread yesterday.
I know that this post hasn't to do with anything, but.
Chloe May has been harassing everyone on Newgrounds and DeviantArt, people are telling the nice truth about her and her awful behavior. Trolls must go to jail, people should NOT be okay defending Chloe May. Chloe makes alt accounts every single time and played a horrible victim card when people were falling on a trap that she "didn't do anything wrong".
I have a feeling that cops are okay with her bullying behavior. Not okay at all!
True as that may or may not be, it's already been established that the Portal isn't the place for these kinds of call-out posts, as seen by the removal of the video I posted to the thread yesterday.
From the movie guidelines:
"Personal attacks towards other members of the community and targeted harassment campaigns will likely result in removal."
Just glitchin' about.
