At 6/23/24 11:32 PM, XD0042006 wrote:

At 6/23/24 10:08 PM, YendorNG wrote:
Maybe 10% of this video is AI...

ACKSHually. User YendorNG, while my original report was of a content rating issue, i thought it noteworthy to mention the musik is also AI, I did NOT mention the complication of the track being an actual existing song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZtETspBs) however.

If you ask me why. For one, i don't know if we actually care about such things in movies.
for two. i dont care. Thirdly would be the complication of using AI to duet a song. for your movie. is it against the rules? If the song is copywritten, does ai make it a transformative work? Does anyone even fucking care?! who knows! How about you tell me.

Oh yea: ps. --
Don't even think FOR ONE SECOND you can flag my review, i type and run everything i say and type through a sophisticated neural network consisting of thirteen million transistors for the best and most safe for work responses possible. it is literally impossible for me to be against the rules! So unless you want to lose whistle points and seem like a whistleless buffoon, the thought should be rejected.....personally. And THAT goes for the rest of you lowlives aswell. hmpt.

At 6/23/24 11:32 PM, XD0042006 wrote:

At 6/23/24 10:08 PM, YendorNG wrote:
Maybe 10% of this video is AI...

ACKSHually. User YendorNG, while my original report was of a content rating issue, i thought it noteworthy to mention the musik is also AI, I did NOT mention the complication of the track being an actual existing song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZtETspBs) however.

If you ask me why. For one, i don't know if we actually care about such things in movies.
for two. i dont care. Thirdly would be the complication of using AI to duet a song. for your movie. is it against the rules? If the song is copywritten, does ai make it a transformative work? Does anyone even fucking care?! who knows! How about you tell me.

Oh yea: ps. --
Don't even think FOR ONE SECOND you can flag my review, i type and run everything i say and type through a sophisticated neural network consisting of thirteen million transistors for the best and most safe for work responses possible. it is literally impossible for me to be against the rules! So unless you want to lose whistle points and seem like a whistleless buffoon, the thought should be rejected.....personally. And THAT goes for the rest of you lowlives aswell. hmpt.

At 6/24/24 12:03 AM, tox wrote:

At 6/23/24 11:32 PM, XD0042006 wrote:

At 6/23/24 10:08 PM, YendorNG wrote:
Maybe 10% of this video is AI...

ACKSHually. User YendorNG, while my original report was of a content rating issue, i thought it noteworthy to mention the musik is also AI, I did NOT mention the complication of the track being an actual existing song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZtETspBs) however.

If you ask me why. For one, i don't know if we actually care about such things in movies.
for two. i dont care. Thirdly would be the complication of using AI to duet a song. for your movie. is it against the rules? If the song is copywritten, does ai make it a transformative work? Does anyone even fucking care?! who knows! How about you tell me.

Oh yea: ps. --
Don't even think FOR ONE SECOND you can flag my review, i type and run everything i say and type through a sophisticated neural network consisting of thirteen million transistors for the best and most safe for work responses possible. it is literally impossible for me to be against the rules! So unless you want to lose whistle points and seem like a whistleless buffoon, the thought should be rejected.....personally. And THAT goes for the rest of you lowlives aswell. hmpt.

You do know that coming in here and poking around with an attitude gets you noticed by others, right?

At 6/24/24 12:22 AM, Superboi68 wrote:

At 6/24/24 12:03 AM, tox wrote:

At 6/23/24 11:32 PM, XD0042006 wrote:

At 6/23/24 10:08 PM, YendorNG wrote:
Maybe 10% of this video is AI...

ACKSHually. User YendorNG, while my original report was of a content rating issue, i thought it noteworthy to mention the musik is also AI, I did NOT mention the complication of the track being an actual existing song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZtETspBs) however.

If you ask me why. For one, i don't know if we actually care about such things in movies.
for two. i dont care. Thirdly would be the complication of using AI to duet a song. for your movie. is it against the rules? If the song is copywritten, does ai make it a transformative work? Does anyone even fucking care?! who knows! How about you tell me.

Oh yea: ps. --
Don't even think FOR ONE SECOND you can flag my review, i type and run everything i say and type through a sophisticated neural network consisting of thirteen million transistors for the best and most safe for work responses possible. it is literally impossible for me to be against the rules! So unless you want to lose whistle points and seem like a whistleless buffoon, the thought should be rejected.....personally. And THAT goes for the rest of you lowlives aswell. hmpt.

You do know that coming in here and poking around with an attitude gets you noticed by others, right?

What have I started?

At 6/24/24 12:03 AM, tox wrote:

At 6/23/24 11:32 PM, XD0042006 wrote:

At 6/23/24 10:08 PM, YendorNG wrote:
Maybe 10% of this video is AI...

ACKSHually. User YendorNG, while my original report was of a content rating issue, i thought it noteworthy to mention the musik is also AI, I did NOT mention the complication of the track being an actual existing song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZtETspBs) however.

If you ask me why. For one, i don't know if we actually care about such things in movies.
for two. i dont care. Thirdly would be the complication of using AI to duet a song. for your movie. is it against the rules? If the song is copywritten, does ai make it a transformative work? Does anyone even fucking care?! who knows! How about you tell me.

Oh yea: ps. --
Don't even think FOR ONE SECOND you can flag my review, i type and run everything i say and type through a sophisticated neural network consisting of thirteen million transistors for the best and most safe for work responses possible. it is literally impossible for me to be against the rules! So unless you want to lose whistle points and seem like a whistleless buffoon, the thought should be rejected.....personally. And THAT goes for the rest of you lowlives aswell. hmpt.

You do know that coming in here and poking around with an attitude gets you noticed by others, right?

At 6/24/24 02:26 AM, Big-Boss wrote:

At 6/24/24 12:03 AM, tox wrote:

At 6/23/24 11:32 PM, XD0042006 wrote:

At 6/23/24 10:08 PM, YendorNG wrote:
Maybe 10% of this video is AI...

ACKSHually. User YendorNG, while my original report was of a content rating issue, i thought it noteworthy to mention the musik is also AI, I did NOT mention the complication of the track being an actual existing song (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaSZtETspBs) however.

If you ask me why. For one, i don't know if we actually care about such things in movies.
for two. i dont care. Thirdly would be the complication of using AI to duet a song. for your movie. is it against the rules? If the song is copywritten, does ai make it a transformative work? Does anyone even fucking care?! who knows! How about you tell me.

Oh yea: ps. --
Don't even think FOR ONE SECOND you can flag my review, i type and run everything i say and type through a sophisticated neural network consisting of thirteen million transistors for the best and most safe for work responses possible. it is literally impossible for me to be against the rules! So unless you want to lose whistle points and seem like a whistleless buffoon, the thought should be rejected.....personally. And THAT goes for the rest of you lowlives aswell. hmpt.

You do know that coming in here and poking around with an attitude gets you noticed by others, right?

I feel like I'm missing something here.

At 6/24/24 05:38 AM, XD0042006 wrote:huhg thats not what happened? What happened was a user submitted content using ai in their work (amongst incorrect content rating& presumably copyrighted music), OTHER users made comments concerning AI and more importantly, brought attention to the submission's reviews. This is where I, xd002hwekjrh3, come to elegantly correct the situation using otherworldly logic and undeniable evidence. That exists in the form of my previous comment, for your reading pleasure. Which I advise you to reread!

At 6/24/24 10:38 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936194

It seems the uploader is using this submission to try and call out a specific member of the object show community for grooming? Either way, I highly doubt this should be allowed in the portal, but I'm unsure of how to go about flagging something like this. Please advise.

At 6/24/24 10:45 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/24/24 10:38 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936194

It seems the uploader is using this submission to try and call out a specific member of the object show community for grooming? Either way, I highly doubt this should be allowed in the portal, but I'm unsure of how to go about flagging something like this. Please advise.

I'm certain you can use the Spam flag for this, stating it to be harassment in the notes.
True or not, this kinda stuff's a slam-dunk terms of use violation: https://www.newgrounds.com/wiki/help-information/terms-of-use

At 6/24/24 10:50 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:

At 6/24/24 10:45 AM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/24/24 10:38 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936194

It seems the uploader is using this submission to try and call out a specific member of the object show community for grooming? Either way, I highly doubt this should be allowed in the portal, but I'm unsure of how to go about flagging something like this. Please advise.

I'm certain you can use the Spam flag for this, stating it to be harassment in the notes.
True or not, this kinda stuff's a slam-dunk terms of use violation: https://www.newgrounds.com/wiki/help-information/terms-of-use

Just got nuked. That actually has to be the quickest EGB post to removal time I've ever seen.

At 6/25/24 02:56 AM, SkilledFella wrote:

At 6/25/24 02:47 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936301

This video is being used to spread allegations of "cybercrime" against a DeviantArt user, in a similar vein to the video I posted to the thread yesterday.

I know that this post hasn't to do with anything, but.

Chloe May has been harassing everyone on Newgrounds and DeviantArt, people are telling the nice truth about her and her awful behavior. Trolls must go to jail, people should NOT be okay defending Chloe May. Chloe makes alt accounts every single time and played a horrible victim card when people were falling on a trap that she "didn't do anything wrong".

I have a feeling that cops are okay with her bullying behavior. Not okay at all!

At 6/25/24 04:39 AM, YendorNG wrote:

At 6/25/24 02:56 AM, SkilledFella wrote:

At 6/25/24 02:47 AM, GlitchBuddy wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936301

This video is being used to spread allegations of "cybercrime" against a DeviantArt user, in a similar vein to the video I posted to the thread yesterday.

I know that this post hasn't to do with anything, but.

Chloe May has been harassing everyone on Newgrounds and DeviantArt, people are telling the nice truth about her and her awful behavior. Trolls must go to jail, people should NOT be okay defending Chloe May. Chloe makes alt accounts every single time and played a horrible victim card when people were falling on a trap that she "didn't do anything wrong".

I have a feeling that cops are okay with her bullying behavior. Not okay at all!

Chloe may is a known alias of a SA goon. He lives in South America and there's little that can be done. Ignore him.

At 6/25/24 03:45 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:

At 6/25/24 03:36 PM, ElRandomGMD wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/936384
Stolen Clip from Piemations (i see his watermark)

Found the source, with a near-perfect timestamp:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLL2XwhmAgw&t=121s