I'm pretty sure it was more then 1
At 4/11/24 11:26 AM, olskoo wrote:At 4/10/24 08:14 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:How many People Stole this flarking Flash GameAt 4/10/24 05:53 PM, BlamThisPlz wrote:Stolen:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925435
Original:
https://archive.org/details/candy-bar-adventure-1
One
At 4/11/24 02:05 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:I'm pretty sure it was more then 1At 4/11/24 11:26 AM, olskoo wrote:At 4/10/24 08:14 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:How many People Stole this flarking Flash GameAt 4/10/24 05:53 PM, BlamThisPlz wrote:Stolen:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925435
Original:
https://archive.org/details/candy-bar-adventure-1
One
I tried checking, but NG refused to tell me
he/they - pretty cool guy
he/they - pretty cool guy
I reported this STOLEN video of Steamboat Willie
Just the author usted an AI Voice of Peter Griffin and putting the image of Peter Griffin during all the video.
ElRandomGMD (aka RandomToons)
No animation - still image
Repeat offence: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925416, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925355, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925075, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925218
Let's play a game - how many more times will this get re-uploaded before InTheNowEventually gets banned?
(Investigating further, I found a Youtube and Patreon - the Patreon is definitely abandoned (last post August 2023), whilst the YT may or may not be (last post a week ago))
(I've also downloaded the .swf - can't pinpoint why, but JPEXS might give me something interesting)
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 4/11/24 06:14 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925567
No animation - still image
Repeat offence: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925416, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925355, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925075, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925218
Let's play a game - how many more times will this get re-uploaded before InTheNowEventually gets banned?
(Investigating further, I found a Youtube and Patreon - the Patreon is definitely abandoned (last post August 2023), whilst the YT may or may not be (last post a week ago))
(I've also downloaded the .swf - can't pinpoint why, but JPEXS might give me something interesting)
I reported it as SPAM
ElRandomGMD (aka RandomToons)
At 4/11/24 06:20 PM, ElRandomGMD wrote:At 4/11/24 06:14 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925567I reported it as SPAM
No animation - still image
Repeat offence: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925416, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925355, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925075, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925218
Let's play a game - how many more times will this get re-uploaded before InTheNowEventually gets banned?
(Investigating further, I found a Youtube and Patreon - the Patreon is definitely abandoned (last post August 2023), whilst the YT may or may not be (last post a week ago))
(I've also downloaded the .swf - can't pinpoint why, but JPEXS might give me something interesting)
Same here - I copy-pasted my report here after I was done with the flag.
Anyways, I've done a quick check through the .swf - only thing that caught my interest was that it somehow had nine-hundred and sixty one frames.
I have zero clue why (especially given B got away with only one).
he/they - pretty cool guy
ElRandomGMD (aka RandomToons)
<MISRATED, EXPLICIT>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925586
Rated M despite being porn
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 4/11/24 07:08 PM, ElRandomGMD wrote:InTheNowEnventually is still spaming about Gwimbly
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925578
Just do It again,
Also i reported it as SPAM
I will keep removing it until he's banned from submitting.
At 4/11/24 09:03 PM, guthrie wrote:At 4/11/24 07:08 PM, ElRandomGMD wrote:InTheNowEnventually is still spaming about Gwimbly
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925578
Just do It again,
Also i reported it as SPAM
I will keep removing it until he's banned from submitting.
I'll admit to sending him a strongly-worded DM stating as such after seeing the same sub posted six fucking times.
Judging by the LEGO Alien Reupload Incident, he's one or two re-ups away from getting banned.
(Sidenote: If anyone ever discovered where Class 6B stole the LEGO Alien video from, please tell me - it seems pretty cool)
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 4/11/24 09:20 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/11/24 09:03 PM, guthrie wrote:I'll admit to sending him a strongly-worded DM stating as such after seeing the same sub posted six fucking times.At 4/11/24 07:08 PM, ElRandomGMD wrote:InTheNowEnventually is still spaming about Gwimbly
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925578
Just do It again,
Also i reported it as SPAM
I will keep removing it until he's banned from submitting.
Judging by the LEGO Alien Reupload Incident, he's one or two re-ups away from getting banned.
(Sidenote: If anyone ever discovered where Class 6B stole the LEGO Alien video from, please tell me - it seems pretty cool)
LEGO Stop Motion Alien - LEGO Animation by BRICK FANTASY
Mess with me and I'll rip your face off.
At 4/11/24 06:32 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/11/24 06:20 PM, ElRandomGMD wrote:Same here - I copy-pasted my report here after I was done with the flag.At 4/11/24 06:14 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925567I reported it as SPAM
No animation - still image
Repeat offence: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925416, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925355, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925075, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925218
Let's play a game - how many more times will this get re-uploaded before InTheNowEventually gets banned?
(Investigating further, I found a Youtube and Patreon - the Patreon is definitely abandoned (last post August 2023), whilst the YT may or may not be (last post a week ago))
(I've also downloaded the .swf - can't pinpoint why, but JPEXS might give me something interesting)
Anyways, I've done a quick check through the .swf - only thing that caught my interest was that it somehow had nine-hundred and sixty one frames.
I have zero clue why (especially given B got away with only one).
B actually managed to pass, and there weren't that many rules against spam in 2001, so it's grandfathered.
Mess with me and I'll rip your face off.
At 4/12/24 12:24 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 4/11/24 06:32 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 4/11/24 06:20 PM, ElRandomGMD wrote:Same here - I copy-pasted my report here after I was done with the flag.At 4/11/24 06:14 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925567I reported it as SPAM
No animation - still image
Repeat offence: https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925416, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925355, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925075, https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925218
Let's play a game - how many more times will this get re-uploaded before InTheNowEventually gets banned?
(Investigating further, I found a Youtube and Patreon - the Patreon is definitely abandoned (last post August 2023), whilst the YT may or may not be (last post a week ago))
(I've also downloaded the .swf - can't pinpoint why, but JPEXS might give me something interesting)
Anyways, I've done a quick check through the .swf - only thing that caught my interest was that it somehow had nine-hundred and sixty one frames.
I have zero clue why (especially given B got away with only one).
B actually managed to pass, and there weren't that many rules against spam in 2001, so it's grandfathered.
B is B...
it's a good reminder of why we do what we do
The voting system can be used to pass materials that violate the rules if there are enough people trying to play with the system, but it only takes 1 flag to get the attention of mods who can swoop in and put an end to the foolery
At 4/11/24 09:52 PM, Horgor wrote:At 4/11/24 09:20 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:LEGO Stop Motion Alien - LEGO Animation by BRICK FANTASYAt 4/11/24 09:03 PM, guthrie wrote:I'll admit to sending him a strongly-worded DM stating as such after seeing the same sub posted six fucking times.At 4/11/24 07:08 PM, ElRandomGMD wrote:InTheNowEnventually is still spaming about Gwimbly
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925578
Just do It again,
Also i reported it as SPAM
I will keep removing it until he's banned from submitting.
Judging by the LEGO Alien Reupload Incident, he's one or two re-ups away from getting banned.
(Sidenote: If anyone ever discovered where Class 6B stole the LEGO Alien video from, please tell me - it seems pretty cool)
Thanks for finding it - we can put that mystery to rest.
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 4/11/24 09:20 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:I'll admit to sending him a strongly-worded DM stating as such after seeing the same sub posted six fucking times.
InTheNow ended up giving me two responses in DMs: one was a simple "who tf are you", the other is this:
Getting back to standard patrols:
No animation - live action
he/they - pretty cool guy
No animation - gameplay footage
No animation - compilation of live-action footage
BGM is "Cowbell Goth" by Dragonmane:
he/they - pretty cool guy
IRL recording, no animation
Noticed you don't touch pictures here, but I have a problem with this one:
Explicit: https://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/evildudeart/shepard-on-duty-mass-effect
I don't have proofs that it's AI-generated, except that the creator mentions himself as AI artist on another social media.
Flag or nay?
Professional media sourcerer looking for your requests
At 4/12/24 06:15 PM, fornever wrote:Explicit: https://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/evildudeart/shepard-on-duty-mass-effect
I don't have proofs that it's AI-generated, except that the creator mentions himself as AI artist on another social media.
Flag or nay?
I'm not 100% certain its AI, but the creator allegedly calling themselves an AI artist makes me suspect it probably is.
Anyways,
<EXPLICIT>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925704
Speedpaint
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 4/12/24 06:15 PM, fornever wrote:IRL recording, no animation
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/925708
Noticed you don't touch pictures here, but I have a problem with this one:
Explicit: https://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/evildudeart/shepard-on-duty-mass-effect
I don't have proofs that it's AI-generated, except that the creator mentions himself as AI artist on another social media.
Flag or nay?
I think that user is legit.
They posted this on IG.
Also, I compared the faces from both panels in the comic linked above and they match exactly like images that are traced from the same construction. I've never seen AI generate two images of the same character this flawlessly.
At 4/12/24 06:15 PM, fornever wrote:Explicit: https://www.newgrounds.com/art/view/evildudeart/shepard-on-duty-mass-effect
I don't have proofs that it's AI-generated, except that the creator mentions himself as AI artist on another social media.
Flag or nay?
I recommend flagging it as the AI artist bit listed on another social media profile is sufficient cause for concern.
I’ve got enough evidence that the 2024 content is developed with an AI tool. AI users are not necessarily non-artists.
I checked that dude's art and I couldn't find a single thing that would make me sure it's AI generated.The hands look alright, there aren't any questionable illogical looking objects in the background. I dunno. The reasons to not only stop making new art but also to stop discovering new art are piling up.
I suspect he used AI to do the bulk of the work generating images, then manually touched them up himself, which is how GenAI is used in professional settings. Judging by his Instagram he's still a skilled artist in his own right. Still, if I can't find more damning evidence besides a hunch I usually wait for them to upload more art, at some point they upload something with more obvious tells.
At 4/13/24 12:16 AM, Czyszy wrote:Also, I compared the faces from both panels in the comic linked above and they match exactly like images that are traced from the same construction. I've never seen AI generate two images of the same character this flawlessly.
It can, though. You can ask it to make small changes to a pre-existing image and you'll get a result that looks something like this. If he had redrawn the faces manually then the features that don't need changing (the nose, the ear) would not have changed at all.
At 4/13/24 06:00 AM, Czyszy wrote:I checked that dude's art and I couldn't find a single thing that would make me sure it's AI generated.The hands look alright, there aren't any questionable illogical looking objects in the background. I dunno. The reasons to not only stop making new art but also to stop discovering new art are piling up.
His 2024 works and profile pic have familiar Stable Diffusion stink. And you can spot weird asymmetry on the boots and socks on the picture I linked.
I'm aware there are hybrid artists, but the flag states "majority was generated by AI". So the % is debatable.
Professional media sourcerer looking for your requests
At 4/13/24 06:13 AM, fornever wrote:At 4/13/24 06:00 AM, Czyszy wrote:I checked that dude's art and I couldn't find a single thing that would make me sure it's AI generated.The hands look alright, there aren't any questionable illogical looking objects in the background. I dunno. The reasons to not only stop making new art but also to stop discovering new art are piling up.His 2024 works and profile pic have familiar Stable Diffusion stink. And you can spot weird asymmetry on the boots and socks on the picture I linked.
I'm aware there are hybrid artists, but the flag states "majority was generated by AI". So the % is debatable.
Yeah, I didn't mean to justify his use of AI when I mentioned the retouching. It's more to say it makes it harder to catch. The rendering style of his 2024 images is very AI-y for sure, his older submissions don't have that.
At 4/13/24 06:13 AM, fornever wrote:At 4/13/24 06:00 AM, Czyszy wrote:I checked that dude's art and I couldn't find a single thing that would make me sure it's AI generated.The hands look alright, there aren't any questionable illogical looking objects in the background. I dunno. The reasons to not only stop making new art but also to stop discovering new art are piling up.His 2024 works and profile pic have familiar Stable Diffusion stink. And you can spot weird asymmetry on the boots and socks on the picture I linked.
I'm aware there are hybrid artists, but the flag states "majority was generated by AI". So the % is debatable.
Oh yeah. I can kinda see those artifacts. But if it hadn't been pointed out to me, I wouldn't have figured it out myself. I think soon, artists on NG will be required to submit evidence that they are the authors of their art (for each single submission) in the form of a speedpaint to have their art approved. :(
