Geometry Dash strikes again. Man, what's with all of these Geometry dash gameplay videos being posted here every week?
Stolen from TikTok. No animation.
it not just GD it also Crappy Madness movies
At 3/8/24 11:29 PM, Dratuna wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/921098
Geometry Dash strikes again. Man, what's with all of these Geometry dash gameplay videos being posted here every week?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/921095
Stolen from TikTok. No animation.
Dub of a Hazbin Hotel episode
Slideshow
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 3/8/24 11:29 PM, Dratuna wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/921098
Geometry Dash strikes again. Man, what's with all of these Geometry dash gameplay videos being posted here every week?
By my guess, its probably a combination of the game being extremely popular online and the Song ID system making players quite aware of NG.
It does mean we have to deal with a glut of GD gameplay footage, but that's a price I'd willingly pay to keep NG from falling into obscurity and to earn some easy whistle points.
he/they - pretty cool guy
Reupload of removed submission, by author's admission
Speedpaint
he/they - pretty cool guy
this is not his this comes from the https://neal.fun/design-the-next-iphone/
Nothing but A JPEG File and music
IM ON A ROLL
Stolen from:
Make Me a Sandwich | Short Horror Film
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfGEdmZyVyY&ab_channel=DeformedLunchbox
Music visualizer
Cover of "Zanta" from Holiday Mod:
https://fridaynightfunking.fandom.com/wiki/Holiday_Mod
No animation - still image
he/they - pretty cool guy
he/they - pretty cool guy
he/they - pretty cool guy
At 3/9/24 12:28 PM, Czyszy wrote:Should censored M rated duplicates of NSFW movies be reported?
I know the author has already withdrawn this due to dogpiling, but for next time: aren't the relevant movie guidelines around this basically all about the P-Bots? That is: they mentioning opting out of awards for secondary versions (such as a second language) to prevent winning more than one slot. It's well established that multiple versions (languages, censorship levels) of movies are okay, even Tom has mentioned this, so--again--I assume it's about slots and in this case an A version is ineligible for awards anyway? So no fuss no muss?
Anyone else want to weigh in and/or share a more informed gospel?
At 3/9/24 11:38 PM, alsoknownas1 wrote:At 3/9/24 12:28 PM, Czyszy wrote:Should censored M rated duplicates of NSFW movies be reported?
I know the author has already withdrawn this due to dogpiling, but for next time: aren't the relevant movie guidelines around this basically all about the P-Bots? That is: they mentioning opting out of awards for secondary versions (such as a second language) to prevent winning more than one slot. It's well established that multiple versions (languages, censorship levels) of movies are okay, even Tom has mentioned this, so--again--I assume it's about slots and in this case an A version is ineligible for awards anyway? So no fuss no muss?
Anyone else want to weigh in and/or share a more informed gospel?
it's a duplicate upload/cut-down version of the second upload
there is no rule against doing this but the second item gets taken down as it is un-needed clutter in the portal
imagine if everyone did that
the original intention was to create an A-rated piece, so the artist should stay the course and create an A-rated piece, not try to create 2 different versions of the same animation, in the end, it is handled as general spam
At 3/9/24 11:38 PM, alsoknownas1 wrote:It's well established that multiple versions (languages, censorship levels) of movies are okay, even Tom has mentioned this
Thanks. That's all I needed to know. ;) If Tom allows it, then it's ok.
At 3/9/24 11:46 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 3/9/24 11:38 PM, alsoknownas1 wrote:It's well established that multiple versions (languages, censorship levels) of movies are okay, even Tom has mentioned this
Thanks. That's all I needed to know. ;) If Tom allows it, then it's ok.
the term is suitably transformative.
At 3/9/24 11:38 PM, alsoknownas1 wrote:At 3/9/24 12:28 PM, Czyszy wrote:Should censored M rated duplicates of NSFW movies be reported?
I know the author has already withdrawn this due to dogpiling, but for next time: aren't the relevant movie guidelines around this basically all about the P-Bots? That is: they mentioning opting out of awards for secondary versions (such as a second language) to prevent winning more than one slot. It's well established that multiple versions (languages, censorship levels) of movies are okay, even Tom has mentioned this, so--again--I assume it's about slots and in this case an A version is ineligible for awards anyway? So no fuss no muss?
Anyone else want to weigh in and/or share a more informed gospel?
Under the Movie Guidelines, this would be considered a variant. NSFW or not, the Guidelines says they should be opted out.
They are allowed on the Portal, but they shouldn't get in the way of brand new projects, as technically you're not adding that much new stuff into it (or in this case, you're taking something out).
It also did not say the original project needs to have won an award or be eligible for an award.
"If you are uploading something that could be considered a variant or re-upload of an existing project, please check the "Opt out of any awards" box at the bottom of your project details form. Variants include style variations of something you previously published, dubs in different languages or a re-upload of something you previously unpublished. If you are merely updating an existing entry, we ask that you update the existing file rather than create a new entry."
I also think the removal was done by a moderator, since I flagged it as a variant.
If the author removed it themselves, it will display this.
CS - Musician, animator, and nostalgia enthusiast since 2020.
- they/she - 🏳️⚧️
At 3/9/24 11:56 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Under the Movie Guidelines, this would be considered a variant. NSFW or not, the Guidelines says they should be opted out.
My point is why not consider the A the variant and the M the primary? The rules are very clearly about the "secondary" version and don't provide guidelines on making that determination. Tom and the editorial staff have let P-Bots stand of variants and have featured variants on the front page, so clearly there's ambiguity here.
I get it was taken down (I forgot about that trick to tell how, so thanks BTW) but given it could also have been considered misrated, that's why I'd love a weigh-in/clarification of the reason for when this comes up again. Here there was little difference between the two variants, but one could imagine a version of a longer cartoon which cuts a scene for example.
At 3/10/24 12:04 AM, alsoknownas1 wrote:At 3/9/24 11:56 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Under the Movie Guidelines, this would be considered a variant. NSFW or not, the Guidelines says they should be opted out.
My point is why not consider the A the variant and the M the primary? The rules are very clearly about the "secondary" version and don't provide guidelines on making that determination. Tom and the editorial staff have let P-Bots stand of variants and have featured variants on the front page, so clearly there's ambiguity here.
I get it was taken down (I forgot about that trick to tell how, so thanks BTW) but given it could also have been considered misrated, that's why I'd love a weigh-in/clarification of the reason for when this comes up again. Here there was little difference between the two variants, but one could imagine a version of a longer cartoon which cuts a scene for example.
Because the A was uploaded first?
CS - Musician, animator, and nostalgia enthusiast since 2020.
- they/she - 🏳️⚧️
At 3/10/24 12:08 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Because the A was uploaded first?
On the same day... given the unreliability of the portal system, uploads etc. that hardly shows intent.
At 3/10/24 12:13 AM, alsoknownas1 wrote:At 3/10/24 12:08 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Because the A was uploaded first?
On the same day... given the unreliability of the portal system, uploads etc. that hardly shows intent.
The author is primarily an NSFW author, and both submission are still intended to be sexual in nature (note the tags).
Whether the loop version came first vs the dick version, or if only the loop version was uploaded, it wouldn't really matter. Combined with their short length, it'd be best to be safe then sorry.
CS - Musician, animator, and nostalgia enthusiast since 2020.
- they/she - 🏳️⚧️
he/they - pretty cool guy
Music is "该怎样爱(How to Love)" by Jeff Chang: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrD36rogSjc
Footage is from Spongebob Squarepants
No animation - live action
he/they - pretty cool guy
he/they - pretty cool guy
Look how many fans they have GOTTA BE ALL BOTS
At 3/10/24 03:52 PM, antmaster208 wrote:I found a user thats submitting games with half the features locked behind a pateron paywall.
<NSFW>animecream.newgrounds.com/games
likely violates either rule:
At 3/10/24 03:52 PM, antmaster208 wrote:I found a user thats submitting games with half the features locked behind a pateron paywall.
<NSFW>animecream.newgrounds.com/games
likely violates either rule:
it doesn't violate any rules
he is just a guy who doing an AD About a model and telling people to sub follow etc his other's stuff
At 3/10/24 05:01 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/921356
he is just a guy who doing an AD About a model and telling people to sub follow etc his other's stuff
swing and a miss
OH COME ON we all got mad when @illwillpress did it
At 3/10/24 05:05 PM, tox wrote:At 3/10/24 05:01 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/921356
he is just a guy who doing an AD About a model and telling people to sub follow etc his other's stuff
swing and a miss
