At 3/9/24 12:28 PM, Czyszy wrote:Should censored M rated duplicates of NSFW movies be reported?
I know the author has already withdrawn this due to dogpiling, but for next time: aren't the relevant movie guidelines around this basically all about the P-Bots? That is: they mentioning opting out of awards for secondary versions (such as a second language) to prevent winning more than one slot. It's well established that multiple versions (languages, censorship levels) of movies are okay, even Tom has mentioned this, so--again--I assume it's about slots and in this case an A version is ineligible for awards anyway? So no fuss no muss?
Anyone else want to weigh in and/or share a more informed gospel?
At 3/9/24 11:38 PM, alsoknownas1 wrote:At 3/9/24 12:28 PM, Czyszy wrote:Should censored M rated duplicates of NSFW movies be reported?
I know the author has already withdrawn this due to dogpiling, but for next time: aren't the relevant movie guidelines around this basically all about the P-Bots? That is: they mentioning opting out of awards for secondary versions (such as a second language) to prevent winning more than one slot. It's well established that multiple versions (languages, censorship levels) of movies are okay, even Tom has mentioned this, so--again--I assume it's about slots and in this case an A version is ineligible for awards anyway? So no fuss no muss?
Anyone else want to weigh in and/or share a more informed gospel?
it's a duplicate upload/cut-down version of the second upload
there is no rule against doing this but the second item gets taken down as it is un-needed clutter in the portal
imagine if everyone did that
the original intention was to create an A-rated piece, so the artist should stay the course and create an A-rated piece, not try to create 2 different versions of the same animation, in the end, it is handled as general spam
At 3/9/24 11:38 PM, alsoknownas1 wrote:It's well established that multiple versions (languages, censorship levels) of movies are okay, even Tom has mentioned this
Thanks. That's all I needed to know. ;) If Tom allows it, then it's ok.
At 3/9/24 11:46 PM, Czyszy wrote:At 3/9/24 11:38 PM, alsoknownas1 wrote:It's well established that multiple versions (languages, censorship levels) of movies are okay, even Tom has mentioned this
Thanks. That's all I needed to know. ;) If Tom allows it, then it's ok.
the term is suitably transformative.
At 3/9/24 11:38 PM, alsoknownas1 wrote:At 3/9/24 12:28 PM, Czyszy wrote:Should censored M rated duplicates of NSFW movies be reported?
I know the author has already withdrawn this due to dogpiling, but for next time: aren't the relevant movie guidelines around this basically all about the P-Bots? That is: they mentioning opting out of awards for secondary versions (such as a second language) to prevent winning more than one slot. It's well established that multiple versions (languages, censorship levels) of movies are okay, even Tom has mentioned this, so--again--I assume it's about slots and in this case an A version is ineligible for awards anyway? So no fuss no muss?
Anyone else want to weigh in and/or share a more informed gospel?
Under the Movie Guidelines, this would be considered a variant. NSFW or not, the Guidelines says they should be opted out.
They are allowed on the Portal, but they shouldn't get in the way of brand new projects, as technically you're not adding that much new stuff into it (or in this case, you're taking something out).
It also did not say the original project needs to have won an award or be eligible for an award.
"If you are uploading something that could be considered a variant or re-upload of an existing project, please check the "Opt out of any awards" box at the bottom of your project details form. Variants include style variations of something you previously published, dubs in different languages or a re-upload of something you previously unpublished. If you are merely updating an existing entry, we ask that you update the existing file rather than create a new entry."
I also think the removal was done by a moderator, since I flagged it as a variant.
If the author removed it themselves, it will display this.
At 3/9/24 11:56 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Under the Movie Guidelines, this would be considered a variant. NSFW or not, the Guidelines says they should be opted out.
My point is why not consider the A the variant and the M the primary? The rules are very clearly about the "secondary" version and don't provide guidelines on making that determination. Tom and the editorial staff have let P-Bots stand of variants and have featured variants on the front page, so clearly there's ambiguity here.
I get it was taken down (I forgot about that trick to tell how, so thanks BTW) but given it could also have been considered misrated, that's why I'd love a weigh-in/clarification of the reason for when this comes up again. Here there was little difference between the two variants, but one could imagine a version of a longer cartoon which cuts a scene for example.
At 3/10/24 12:04 AM, alsoknownas1 wrote:At 3/9/24 11:56 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Under the Movie Guidelines, this would be considered a variant. NSFW or not, the Guidelines says they should be opted out.
My point is why not consider the A the variant and the M the primary? The rules are very clearly about the "secondary" version and don't provide guidelines on making that determination. Tom and the editorial staff have let P-Bots stand of variants and have featured variants on the front page, so clearly there's ambiguity here.
I get it was taken down (I forgot about that trick to tell how, so thanks BTW) but given it could also have been considered misrated, that's why I'd love a weigh-in/clarification of the reason for when this comes up again. Here there was little difference between the two variants, but one could imagine a version of a longer cartoon which cuts a scene for example.
Because the A was uploaded first?
At 3/10/24 12:08 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Because the A was uploaded first?
On the same day... given the unreliability of the portal system, uploads etc. that hardly shows intent.
At 3/10/24 12:13 AM, alsoknownas1 wrote:At 3/10/24 12:08 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:Because the A was uploaded first?
On the same day... given the unreliability of the portal system, uploads etc. that hardly shows intent.
The author is primarily an NSFW author, and both submission are still intended to be sexual in nature (note the tags).
Whether the loop version came first vs the dick version, or if only the loop version was uploaded, it wouldn't really matter. Combined with their short length, it'd be best to be safe then sorry.
Music is "该怎样爱(How to Love)" by Jeff Chang: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrD36rogSjc
Footage is from Spongebob Squarepants
No animation - live action
Look how many fans they have GOTTA BE ALL BOTS
At 3/10/24 03:52 PM, antmaster208 wrote:I found a user thats submitting games with half the features locked behind a pateron paywall.
<NSFW>animecream.newgrounds.com/games
likely violates either rule:
At 3/10/24 03:52 PM, antmaster208 wrote:I found a user thats submitting games with half the features locked behind a pateron paywall.
<NSFW>animecream.newgrounds.com/games
likely violates either rule:
it doesn't violate any rules
he is just a guy who doing an AD About a model and telling people to sub follow etc his other's stuff
At 3/10/24 05:01 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/921356
he is just a guy who doing an AD About a model and telling people to sub follow etc his other's stuff
swing and a miss
OH COME ON we all got mad when @illwillpress did it
At 3/10/24 05:05 PM, tox wrote:At 3/10/24 05:01 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/921356
he is just a guy who doing an AD About a model and telling people to sub follow etc his other's stuff
swing and a miss
this does not violate any rules
also I don't recall foamy right now
At 3/10/24 05:06 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:OH COME ON we all got mad when formy did itAt 3/10/24 05:05 PM, tox wrote:At 3/10/24 05:01 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/921356
he is just a guy who doing an AD About a model and telling people to sub follow etc his other's stuff
swing and a miss
At 3/10/24 05:06 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:OH COME ON we all got mad when @illwillpress did itAt 3/10/24 05:05 PM, tox wrote:At 3/10/24 05:01 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/921356
he is just a guy who doing an AD About a model and telling people to sub follow etc his other's stuff
swing and a miss
There's a difference between "I made this model and then I made an animation for the model based on a show with dicktits" versus "shamelessly plugging ads your ass without any animation."
The submission is just gameplay footage of someone playing in Garry's Mod.
At 3/10/24 03:52 PM, antmaster208 wrote:I found a user thats submitting games with half the features locked behind a pateron paywall.
Stop lookin at porno, son!
If it all was blocked, then it would qualify, but it's got some of playable content, so, not rule breaking. Forward the link to AlexToolStudio, would ya kindly.
At 3/10/24 03:56 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:Look how many fans they have GOTTA BE ALL BOTS
Go occupy yourself with something. Like porno. There's a link around here somewherez.
At 3/10/24 05:06 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:OH COME ON we all got mad when @illwillpress did it
WE didn't get mad. You got mad cuz yer a dunbass.
Pronounced: dun-bass. ...cuz he's a dun bass.
At 3/10/24 05:01 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:he is just a guy who doing an AD About a model and telling people to sub follow etc his other's stuff
Short animation, long credits. Vote what ya will and move on.
At 3/10/24 05:13 PM, tox wrote:this does not violate any rules
also I don't recall foamy right now
At 3/11/24 02:37 AM, Exedor wrote:At 3/10/24 03:52 PM, antmaster208 wrote:I found a user thats submitting games with half the features locked behind a pateron paywall.Stop lookin at porno, son!
At 3/10/24 03:56 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:Look how many fans they have GOTTA BE ALL BOTSGo occupy yourself with something. Like porno. There's a link around here somewherez.
Duality.
This is a TikTok video.
This video is primarily made using AI -- AI voices and PIKALABS
At 3/11/24 11:21 AM, Aalasteir wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/921417
This is a TikTok video.
No animation - still image
Music video for Aphex Twin's "Come to Daddy", which is owned by Warp Records
Music video for Prefuse 73's "The End of Biters - International", which is owned by Warp Records
At 3/10/24 04:49 PM, tox wrote:At 3/10/24 03:52 PM, antmaster208 wrote:I found a user thats submitting games with half the features locked behind a pateron paywall.
<NSFW>animecream.newgrounds.com/games
likely violates either rule:
it doesn't violate any rules
Yeah but 2 of them I removed for being Underage Content. So we can call that a good find.
