At 1/18/24 01:16 AM, tox wrote:lol, that's so crazy dude
Seriously though, fair enough. :)
At 1/18/24 07:03 AM, CzySzy wrote:Almost static visualizer
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/914564
Its also stolen:
DIdn't this shit got taken down before? Because I swear we talked about this submission in here.
At 1/18/24 07:51 AM, BickerySebastian wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/914516
DIdn't this shit got taken down before? Because I swear we talked about this submission in here.
Yes we did, and I did not forget.
It was taken down because someone uploaded it on the creator's behalf, as well as theorized that the uploader was an alt made to get around a ban, both of which were not allowed on NG.
This time, the creator got unbanned and was able to repost it himself this time, for real.
At 1/18/24 01:49 PM, krinu wrote:At 1/17/24 04:47 PM, tox wrote:So this forum post went from military rp to a portal cleanup?At 1/17/24 02:42 PM, YendorNG wrote:At 1/17/24 02:35 PM, BlueMonday1984 wrote:At 1/17/24 01:42 PM, Dreggsu wrote:At 1/17/24 09:51 AM, gamejunkie wrote:Greetings my friends.
This is not EGB related BUT is of great importance. Is anyone having to go through the 2 step authentication process every time you log out & log back in? For example, if you log out & log back in (possibly if you use an alt account) once you've entered your username & password & pressed enter are you then prompted for a 6 digit code (which should be sent to your email)?
It's important to know if this is happening as yesterdays upgrades/updates might have screwed with the sign in system & if so we can have it fix pronto. Thanks for any & all replies.
If you're not sure, try logging out & logging back in & see what happens.
Newgrounds is now introducing mandatory 2FA, but instead of using an authenticator, you need to use your email.
Post by Tom announcing this:
https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/1531148
This kind of thing was a long time coming, especially after the account break-ins late last year.
I personally feel like the next step security wise would be to implement passkey support, but that's getting a bit off-topic.
Will you all please give those suggestions to tom instead of spamming it in here? Thanks.
Just to be sure on this idea, the ideals of the EGB is the defense of and protection for the portals
Portals are inherently tied to new grounds
Newgrounds is tied to its user base
It's user base is the customer in this case
Its a little Column A, a little Column B. Been that way since EagleRock kicked things off back in '05.
No animation, slideshow
Do not submit pictures in a slideshow format.
https://www.newgrounds.com/wiki/help-information/terms-of-use/movie-guidelines
This will inevitably get what it deserves but it's just a test & from memory tests should be placed in your personal file dump.
www.newgrounds.com/wiki/help-information/terms-of-use/movie-guidelines
Hate Speech
Your submission must not be racist or downright hateful towards specific groups of people.
At 1/18/24 07:49 PM, gamejunkie wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/914619
www.newgrounds.com/wiki/help-information/terms-of-use/movie-guidelines
Hate Speech
Your submission must not be racist or downright hateful towards specific groups of people.
Previous movie of his got the ZabuJard stamp of approval, so this might get a pass too. Maybe they both won't? Who knows? But keep this in mind.
the way he replied to me definitely reminded me of Sal Manella from Phoenix, wright
At 1/18/24 07:49 PM, gamejunkie wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/914619
www.newgrounds.com/wiki/help-information/terms-of-use/movie-guidelines
Hate Speech
Your submission must not be racist or downright hateful towards specific groups of people.
At 1/18/24 08:39 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 1/18/24 07:49 PM, gamejunkie wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/914619
www.newgrounds.com/wiki/help-information/terms-of-use/movie-guidelines
Hate Speech
Your submission must not be racist or downright hateful towards specific groups of people.
Previous movie of his got the ZabuJard stamp of approval, so this might get a pass too. Maybe they both won't? Who knows? But keep this in mind.
The ZabuJard stamp of approval means jack shit, my evidence is bad Foamy the Squirrel cartoons winning the Daily 5.
But never mind that, I'm leaning on a soft "Yeah, no, this shit's gotta go," because like yeah, I can see why it's hate speech, considering the description is just how to kill a British person in different ways, and also considering the previous movie just being offensive to some degree (I'm not black nor trans, so don't quote me on this.) because it doesn't use race or transgenderism as a way that constitutes criticism or making fun of stereotypes themselves, it's just a cat who can't get any bitches, does racist shit, and kills a black person. Every black person in the movie is depicted with blackface. You could say that the movie is deliberate on this because it's meant to show how Incel Cat's really racist, but said racist isn't remotely problematic nor is he punished for it, he can just evade any form of justice because apparently, his racism powers him to avoid prison. This even applies to trans people, as they're more or less stereotyped as sexual predatory deviants who merely use children as a way to spread their ideals.
If there was an artistic merit to any of what I've mentioned, at least I would defend as much as I can for what it is, but again, who knows, maybe there's a majority who'll support me on this or not.
At 1/18/24 09:18 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 1/18/24 08:39 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:The ZabuJard stamp of approval means jack shit, my evidence is bad Foamy the Squirrel cartoons winning the Daily 5.At 1/18/24 07:49 PM, gamejunkie wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/914619
www.newgrounds.com/wiki/help-information/terms-of-use/movie-guidelines
Hate Speech
Your submission must not be racist or downright hateful towards specific groups of people.
Previous movie of his got the ZabuJard stamp of approval, so this might get a pass too. Maybe they both won't? Who knows? But keep this in mind.
But never mind that, I'm leaning on a soft "Yeah, no, this shit's gotta go," because like yeah, I can see why it's hate speech, considering the description is just how to kill a British person in different ways, and also considering the previous movie just being offensive to some degree (I'm not black nor trans, so don't quote me on this.) because it doesn't use race or transgenderism as a way that constitutes criticism or making fun of stereotypes themselves, it's just a cat who can't get any bitches, does racist shit, and kills a black person. Every black person in the movie is depicted with blackface. You could say that the movie is deliberate on this because it's meant to show how Incel Cat's really racist, but said racist isn't remotely problematic nor is he punished for it, he can just evade any form of justice because apparently, his racism powers him to avoid prison. This even applies to trans people, as they're more or less stereotyped as sexual predatory deviants who merely use children as a way to spread their ideals.
If there was an artistic merit to any of what I've mentioned, at least I would defend as much as I can for what it is, but again, who knows, maybe there's a majority who'll support me on this or not.
I'm not gonna take any stances on this, but if you're gonna report that movie for hate speech, you're gonna have to report all 3 of them.
Yes, he made a 3rd one now.
At 1/18/24 07:34 PM, gamejunkie wrote:This will inevitably get what it deserves but it's just a test & from memory tests should be placed in your personal file dump.
the file dump is now hidden behind a subscription paywall, that came out in the last few months-ish, and as for the test idea, I do not have any documents or snapshots of time machine crawls that reference "test"
what year does the test rule come from? it does not exist any longer, so I'm just curious on a historical basis
At 1/18/24 09:16 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:the way he replied to me definitely reminded me of Sal Manella from Phoenix, wright
Sal Manella speaks in L33t, you goddamn noob. This reeks media illiteracy.
And even then...
Gee, I wonder why he was acting like that.
In fact, I don't even know if I have bragging rights for just reporting "reviews" like these, because whenever I see a shitty reviewer, I take the chance to report any reviews they made that is violating the review guidelines. I mean, at least there's one way of getting whistle points, sure it's not fast and rewarding but fuck it, at least you're putting your knowledge of shit on the real deal.
At 1/18/24 10:23 PM, BickerySebastian wrote:At 1/18/24 09:16 PM, AlexToolStudio wrote:the way he replied to me definitely reminded me of Sal Manella from Phoenix, wrightSal Manella speaks in L33t, you goddamn noob. This reeks media illiteracy.
Tone it back Bickery
At 1/18/24 10:12 PM, tox wrote:At 1/18/24 07:34 PM, gamejunkie wrote:This will inevitably get what it deserves but it's just a test & from memory tests should be placed in your personal file dump.
the file dump is now hidden behind a subscription paywall, that came out in the last few months-ish,
So I just accessed my personal dump, https://www.newgrounds.com/dump are you saying that if I wish to dump more pics. audio, etc that I'd have to pay for a subscription? The idea of the dump was to see if your 'test' animations worked before uploading them to the Portals.
and as for the test idea, I do not have any documents or snapshots of time machine crawls that reference "test"
Your submission must not be a pointless "demo" or "preview" without any redeeming qualities.
A 'demo' is a test is a demo is a test. Either way, the submission had no redeeming qualities & inevitably got what it deserved.
what year does the test rule come from? it does not exist any longer, so I'm just curious on a historical basis
The 'demo or preview' rule has always been there. Basically if you're not sure if your 'submission/test' will work or is any good, you put it in your dump, send the link to a few NG peeps & get some feedback before clogging the Portal with crap.
At 1/19/24 02:02 AM, gamejunkie wrote:At 1/18/24 10:12 PM, tox wrote:At 1/18/24 07:34 PM, gamejunkie wrote:This will inevitably get what it deserves but it's just a test & from memory tests should be placed in your personal file dump.
the file dump is now hidden behind a subscription paywall, that came out in the last few months-ish,
So I just accessed my personal dump, https://www.newgrounds.com/dump are you saying that if I wish to dump more pics. audio, etc that I'd have to pay for a subscription? The idea of the dump was to see if your 'test' animations worked before uploading them to the Portals.
that one took some digging yikes
https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/1511759
and as for the test idea, I do not have any documents or snapshots of time machine crawls that reference "test"
Your submission must not be a pointless "demo" or "preview" without any redeeming qualities.
A 'demo' is a test is a demo is a test. Either way, the submission had no redeeming qualities & inevitably got what it deserved.
what year does the test rule come from? it does not exist any longer, so I'm just curious on a historical basis
The 'demo or preview' rule has always been there. Basically if you're not sure if your 'submission/test' will work or is any good, you put it in your dump, send the link to a few NG peeps & get some feedback before clogging the Portal with crap.
useful, precise, fully explained...
I now know how to use that rule to its fullest
:)
At 1/19/24 02:12 AM, tox wrote:At 1/19/24 02:02 AM, gamejunkie wrote:At 1/18/24 10:12 PM, tox wrote:At 1/18/24 07:34 PM, gamejunkie wrote:This will inevitably get what it deserves but it's just a test & from memory tests should be placed in your personal file dump.
the file dump is now hidden behind a subscription paywall, that came out in the last few months-ish,
So I just accessed my personal dump, https://www.newgrounds.com/dump are you saying that if I wish to dump more pics. audio, etc that I'd have to pay for a subscription? The idea of the dump was to see if your 'test' animations worked before uploading them to the Portals.
that one took some digging yikes
https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/1511759
and as for the test idea, I do not have any documents or snapshots of time machine crawls that reference "test"
Your submission must not be a pointless "demo" or "preview" without any redeeming qualities.
A 'demo' is a test is a demo is a test. Either way, the submission had no redeeming qualities & inevitably got what it deserved.
what year does the test rule come from? it does not exist any longer, so I'm just curious on a historical basis
The 'demo or preview' rule has always been there. Basically if you're not sure if your 'submission/test' will work or is any good, you put it in your dump, send the link to a few NG peeps & get some feedback before clogging the Portal with crap.
useful, precise, fully explained...
I now know how to use that rule to its fullest
)
Alternatives to the Dump:
1- Upload a movie, game, audio, or art to the Project system, but don't publish it. You can set it so anyone with the link can view it. You can make as many of these as you need without needing to pay a dime:
Can accept 10GB video files, 2.5GB HTML5 files, 250MB SWF files, 250MB MP3 files, or 150MB image/GIF files, depending on the project type.
2- Team Tools (also in the Project system) This is for secondary files such as fla, exe, psd, wav etc. For the few files it doesn't support, put them in a zip file. Maximum 100MB per project (of which there's an infinite amount).
This is best for hosting files as a backup for your own use as opposed to private or semi-public sharing.
At 1/19/24 02:12 AM, tox wrote:that one took some digging yikes
https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/1511759
Existing users are grandfathered.
Well that's reasonable I suppose.
I wish I could say the same for real life, I have none (grandkids) of my own, my daughter doesn't want kids & will shortly be having 'the operation' to make sure she doesn't accidentally have any. Thankfully my life partners kids have kids so I treat them as my Grandkids.
Aaaah Life!
At 1/19/24 02:35 AM, gamejunkie wrote:At 1/19/24 02:12 AM, tox wrote:that one took some digging yikes
https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/1511759
Existing users are grandfathered.
Well that's reasonable I suppose.
I wish I could say the same for real life, I have none (grandkids) of my own, my daughter doesn't want kids & will shortly be having 'the operation' to make sure she doesn't accidentally have any. Thankfully my life partners kids have kids so I treat them as my Grandkids.
Aaaah Life!
Lol
Awe...
Well I guess you got the consolation prize
Gamejunkie became a grandfather after all
Sorry to ruin your dad years combo like that boss, someone had to do it
Frog is right though, there are more and nicely balanced ways to preview a game or animation these days, those new tools only really did one thing for us generally speaking
It made all the lazy people have to limbo under the options/tools and squeeze down to try to get by these systems and as a consequence when they pop up on the portal it's a bit like wack-a-mole because they nearly 90% of the time now just write in the title
Bla bla bla test
Or
Demo bla bla
Users in the broader user base very often give animations the old 5 silver star rating and go on their merry way
Most demo's don't usually get more than #30 at best before their title turns red
At 1/19/24 12:42 PM, YendorNG wrote:Adult link ahead.
_http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/914683
Not sure if this is "Growth Fetish" material that needs an A rating. What say you?
An A rating? That's too high because sure, there's fetish shit in it, but if I saw Miku's naked titties started jiggling, then blam, this should have an Adult rating... Except none of them goes naked.
<EXPLICIT>https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/914709
No animation - gameplay footage
No animation - live action
No animation - comic dub
No animation
