HO HO HOPE you become a Newgrounds Supporter this year!
We're working hard to give you the best site possible, but we have bills to pay and community support is vital to keep things going and growing. Thank you for considering!
re-up of blamed
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/876941
team fortress 4 by Dipsywmv
----
re-up of blamed
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/rip/876942
piekarnia pawelek pablo bakery by Dipsywmv
-----------
inflation fetish stuff needs an A rating instead of a T rating
alternatively... I just saw the author's name and got to looking because of the mismatch,
probably going to upgrade this to a stolen video...
https://www.deviantart.com/ozakuc/art/Animation-Tamamo-bublle-gum-backward-flow-898892750
Trumpet bubble by Maiow134
---------
ai animation
"I would be glad if you could appreciate my AI animation 2b"
2b undresses in a public restroom, on camera. by Flovie
adult https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/877212
---------
speed paint
Random combo space girl by ALGrimskull
-------
no animation
REAL YFM LOTS MEDIA MAKE PANST SHIT by gtgtheog-316
-------
At 3/13/23 12:56 AM, tox wrote:I don't recall, do we flag these under a no-animation rule?
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/877167
i think the part that i don't understand is that someone is making an account, uploading the material, and then delete their account or has figured out how to screw with the system enough to have their name read as <deleted>
the same thing is happening here
don't understand the why
--------
speed paint
Time-Lapse Practice by Shad47
At 3/13/23 01:26 PM, freaks-heart wrote:(Warning: adult)
.https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/877212
AI art.
You don't need to obscure the link with some dot, Newgrounds now already does that for you:
At 3/13/23 10:23 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 3/13/23 01:26 PM, freaks-heart wrote:(Warning: adult)
.https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/877212
AI art.
You don't need to obscure the link with some dot, Newgrounds now already does that for you:
I prefer the dot or a warning here
At 3/13/23 10:23 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 3/13/23 01:26 PM, freaks-heart wrote:(Warning: adult)
.https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/877212
AI art.
You don't need to obscure the link with some dot, Newgrounds now already does that for you:
I distinctly remember being warned in this thread about making it so that links to explicit submissions don't preview.
At 3/14/23 07:53 AM, freaks-heart wrote:At 3/13/23 10:23 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 3/13/23 01:26 PM, freaks-heart wrote:(Warning: adult)
.https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/877212
AI art.
You don't need to obscure the link with some dot, Newgrounds now already does that for you:
I distinctly remember being warned in this thread about making it so that links to explicit submissions don't preview.
We get a lot of mis-categorized and improperly thumbnailed links here, so I think we'll keep obscuring NSFW links, just to be careful.
At 3/14/23 08:05 AM, GUTHRIE wrote:At 3/14/23 07:53 AM, freaks-heart wrote:At 3/13/23 10:23 PM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 3/13/23 01:26 PM, freaks-heart wrote:(Warning: adult)
.https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/877212
AI art.
You don't need to obscure the link with some dot, Newgrounds now already does that for you:
I distinctly remember being warned in this thread about making it so that links to explicit submissions don't preview.
We get a lot of mis-categorized and improperly thumbnailed links here, so I think we'll keep obscuring NSFW links, just to be careful.
Makes sense to me.
Not owner of uploader, even says in description. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DR8_G3k7gI
Just a screen capture recording of a YouTube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Io3OG2ckcQ4
Original: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-09DtJb4PLQ
Original: https://twitter.com/MmationsSf/status/1630813627828645889 (NSFW)
Audio visualizer. No animation
No animation
No animation
Reupload of this. It even has the same intro where it shows that he's not the creator.
At 3/16/23 12:28 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:@tox
@byteslinger
How do I get entry into The Elite Guard Barracks?
in the last month you have made
3 posts to the EGB regarding movies that ended up not being accepted by mods
47 posts to the EGB regarding movies that ended up blaming or being accepted
1 post that is currently being investigated by mods for removal
a failure rate of only 6%
the Doctor, from my own monitoring, has shown continued and faithful post quantities and quality over the last several months
from the BBS awards by @little-rena
https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/1517279
he was voted third place to become the next BBS mod
================================================================================
================================================================================
Code of conduct :
do you agree to abide by the code of conduct?
1. Voting fairly.
This is the foundation of the Elite Guard Barracks. All members are expected to give every flash a fair vote, regardless of who made it or what their group affiliations are. We do not target any flash group, not favorably or in opposition; our only enemies are those who break the rules of the site, not those who merely bend them.
Everyone has a different definition of quality, and all members are expected to vote based on what they honestly feel a flash deserves, not on whether they think the flash will pass or be blammed. While Barracks members are proud of their high ranks, and are eager to compete with others, a high B/P score means nothing if achieved through petty point-whore voting, and any member who admits to doing so will be removed from the organization.
2. Stopping Portal abuse.
Numerous stolen, malicious, and unsuitable flash are submitted to the Flash Portal every day, and it is our job to ensure that as many of them are removed as possible. Members are expected to report any suspicious flash to the Barracks, including any evidence or doubts that they might have, and only whistle something if they are sure, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it is whistle-worthy.
Just as with B/P, points mean nothing if achieved through inappropriate means. There should be no blind rush to whistle a flash that is merely suspected of wrongdoing; it's better to let an uncertain case go by rather than wrongly whistle an innocent submission. If evidence of wrongdoing is discovered after a flash passes judgment, we can always (and will always) take the appropriate action.
In the case of a beyond-reasonable-doubt rulebreaking flash, members are encouraged to share their results.
3. Cleaning up the review system.
Members are expected to be familiar with the review guidelines and whistle abusive reviews when they come across them, and report severe cases of abuse to a review mod. Additionally, members are expected to write helpful reviews, offering constructive criticism and remaining civil even when the author refuses to do so. We must set a good example for other Newgrounders, in hopes that they will improve their own reviews as well.
4. Setting an example for others to follow.
Barracks members are expected to post intelligently, contributing to threads rather than merely dropping a one-liner opinion on it. Flaming, spamming, and other ban-worthy behavior is strictly prohibited, and extreme misbehavior will lead to removal from the EGB.
Members are also expected to act civilly towards all Newgrounders. You are expected to be helpful and patient when dealing with newer members, whether simply showing them the FAQ or explaining more complex concepts that they do not understand. Concepts such as fair voting, intelligent posting/reviewing, and keeping an open mind are essential for newer members to learn, and we are just the ones to teach them.
For those with more experience, you are expected to show respect and understand that they may, in fact, know more about Newgrounds than you do, even if you're a seasoned veteran. This applies both to fellow Barracks members and Newgrounders in the general population.
Members are expected to put reasonable effort into any flash or audio submissions, and be careful with who they become Portal Buddies with. We are quite generous with our definition of reasonable effort; examples of unacceptable submissions would be static images, single frames, ridiculously small loops, or purposefully bad music. Anyone submitting rulebreaking content would, obviously, be removed from the Barracks.
5. Not starting shit.
As mentioned above, the Barracks has no enemies beyond those who break the rules of the site. Our roster has included current and former members of various flash groups, including the Clock Crew, Barney Bunch, and Kitty Krew, and we are open to anyone willing to follow our principles. Barracks members are expected to be civil to others and not start fights, and anyone found to be starting shit with anyone, even if they deserve it, will be removed. You are representing the Barracks with your actions, and if your actions do not reflect our principles, you will not be a part of the organization.
6. Remaining active with the group.
Barracks members are expected to remain reasonably active in the thread, as well as with their duties. Those who are inactive for long periods (months) may be removed from the roster at any time, and rollcalls are occasionally sent out to all members to determine who is active. Members who expect to be inactive for some time due to IRL reasons (such as school, employment, vacation, etc) should inform the Barracks in advance.
At 3/16/23 07:32 AM, freaks-heart wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/877492
Gameplay footage from Team Fortress 2.
Gameplay to animation ratio: 5 to 1.
At 3/16/23 07:36 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 3/16/23 07:32 AM, freaks-heart wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/877492
Gameplay footage from Team Fortress 2.
Gameplay to animation ratio: 5 to 1.
it's enough for a blam, right?
At 3/16/23 07:37 AM, freaks-heart wrote:At 3/16/23 07:36 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:At 3/16/23 07:32 AM, freaks-heart wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/877492
Gameplay footage from Team Fortress 2.
Gameplay to animation ratio: 5 to 1.
it's enough for a blam, right?
I woudn't argue against that since the "Other things to avoid" segment of the movie guidelines includes the line
Do not submit Let's Play videos or anything that primarily depends on recorded video game footage.
The cake is a liar!
Literally does nothing but go into fullscreen mode when clicking
Doesn't seem to work for me
The cake is a liar!
At 3/16/23 07:37 AM, freaks-heart wrote:it's enough for a blam, right?
Anything is worthy of a 0. As for is it worthy to be mod removed, for now, I'm leaving it for blam, but it is pushing the gameplay boundary.
At 3/16/23 01:18 AM, tox wrote:from the BBS awards by @little-rena
https://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic/1517279
he was voted third place to become the next BBS mod
Getting nominated for something in the BBS awards doesn't really count for anything, they are just a bit of fun lmao
At 3/16/23 01:18 AM, tox wrote:a lot of stupid shit.
I want @GUTHRIE to respond to this.
At 3/16/23 11:45 AM, cobra1 wrote:At 3/16/23 01:18 AM, tox wrote:a lot of stupid shit.I want @GUTHRIE to respond to this.
Guthrie and I are speaking
At 3/16/23 12:37 PM, tox wrote:At 3/16/23 11:45 AM, cobra1 wrote:At 3/16/23 01:18 AM, tox wrote:a lot of stupid shit.I want @GUTHRIE to respond to this.
Guthrie and I are speaking
I purposely didn't respond here out of respect for the other EGB members and not wanting to publicly air grievances.
But since you asked, nothing has changed since the last time DSB expressed interest in joining.
I'm against DSB being a member, but in the end it's not really up to me. I've also spoken with byte in the past about this and she expressed similar sentiment.