(warning: 18+ furry yiff)

.https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/864046

There's sex here so I'm pretty sure this crosses the line from M to A.

Looks like it's been fixed.

Improper: Rated "E" despite the fact that the Patreon links in description indicate that this preview is for an animation that is intended for viewers 18 years and older. Should be bumped up to M or A for that reason along with containing twerking and a shot of Raven's butt at the end.

(NSFW) Gwen Helps Raven Preview

It's actually funny, I was looking around for the extended video for that exact clip about a week ago because I needed to reference it for exactly the reason that you are talking about

what points would you change in the selector, as far as I know, "cheesed off about a butt growing situation" is not an adult theme and even if we do make an exemption to that:

sex scenes should be classed as A not M

Mami de komi san

adult https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/864084

----------

author admits to not owning the content

"so i was searching ng on archive.org and found this lost kitty krew movie so i reuploaded it!

original creator: @lasse"

[kk] Hej Kanin (lost kk movie)

---------

just a bunch of stolen porn, different artist tags pop up here and there

Overwatch porn

adult https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/864105

.....

same business as above

Overwatch better porn

adult https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/864103

-------

gameplay footage from newgrounds

Playing exorcism

adult https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/864106

We officially disown this upload by Roombaclock, for he is shit and we need him to be not shit.

Let this be a lesson to him to never do this again.

little harsh don't you think?

like he's 13... you are poopin on the little guy

not really. This isn't the first time we've had members get reported here. I REALLY need them to learn to not break the rules again.

I've let him know on Discord, but from what I've found, he likely never paid any attention to the rules.

i mean... you are kinda in a leadership-y role around there... teach them

punishment < education

huh? (newgrounds.com)

Subject #864159

STOLEN: Just an embedded YouTube clip from Spongebob Squarepants.

No animation

No animation

now, correct me if I'm wrong... but doesn't NG allow live-action if the production value's good enough, or if there's animation mixed in with it?

The and and or is important to decipher the meaning:

"doesn't NG allow live-action if the production value's good enough, or if there's animation mixed in with it?" = not quite

"doesn't NG allow live-action if the production value's good enough, and if there's animation mixed in with it?" = better.

His other videos may look live action, but they're CGI, notwithstanding a few seconds of clips probably stolen from some movie.

Thanks mate. What would one report something like that as?

the failure of the animation styles types

i meant like the category

category

Tox is correct. ...but....

Gah, that's $9.85 a can for something you get at the grocery store for less than $4 a can. x_X

...eh, i'll just mark the no animation posts as "spam" and be done with it.

That's what I usually do. Not sure if it's right but it's the only thing I can think of that would fit into that category to a certain degree.

did amazon or Spam Co just tell me that:

spam= pork with pork, salt, water, radioactive potatoes, sugar, and salt?

Uploader is not owner of meme. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/BlTED0BOSl0

no animation

Manual Racism | Manual Blast but Peter Griffin (Normal version)

Tutorial games, in case they don't get blammed.

@exedor

what would be the defense of these games and what would be the prosecution of these games

I never really understood the rule that is being used here on the outlawing of tutorial games

what makes these games cross the line, or not cross the line

content not belonging to the author

Creampie

adult https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/864296

-----------

bunch of still frames strapped together into a neat little PowerPoint animation

heh love this scene

You see, there's a line. If someone crosses that line, then they've crossed that line. However, if they don't cross over....

3rd down on the list: "Your submission must not be a modified version of someone else's work, including tutorial files." I think it used to be more wordy than that, but basically, tutorial games are instructions to re-make someone else's game, not to make your own. Even if some assets are changed, it's still a re-make of someone else's work rather than an original creation.

As much as I love Lego kits and what can be made, there are some people who never have the thought to use those same blocks to make something other than what the kit instructions show. The point of Legos is to create whatever you want. Not just to re-create whatever the kit is for, which is ok if that's all you want to do, but also to create other things; the possibilities are endless. I used to create 3 foot long Star Destroyers when I was a kid. These game engines are the same way: use the tools to create whatever you want, but re-creations of someone else's stuff are not considered your own work and will be removed.

The flappy bird clone has different assets than the original, but it's still an exact clone; his own re-make of flappy, nothing more.

That zombie game doesn't even have any new assets; the green circle with 2 lines for a zombie, the circle main character- everything is stock to the tutorial. He added power ups, but meh.

man... I'm about to get a lot more flaggy then

these games come through like once a week easy

bragon ball capitulo 1 (newgrounds.com)

not original author

:Even if some assets are changed, it's still a re-make of someone else's work rather than an original creation.

:...These game engines are the same way: use the tools to create whatever you want, but re-creations of someone else's stuff are not considered your own work and will be removed.

Does that rule apply for games that are made in different engines?

For example, let's say Person A makes a game called Game A for the game portal under the engine of RPG Maker 2K and some help of EasyRPG (Because RPG Maker 2k games natively aren't made for HTML, so you need EasyRPG to make it accesible.).

Then, Person B decides to remake Game A under RPG Maker MV, like RPG Maker 2k, except MV is scripted in Javascript, which natively can be exported as a HTML game, albeit nobody (At the moment.) knows what coding language RPG Maker 2k uses, in which the clone game is called Game B. Would've there been any factors or exceptions so that Game B stays on the Game Portal?