drizzile wrote:
well it's just 8 seconds of gameplay, even if it's the uploader's game, i think the mods would delete that
Turns out you were right but wanted to give the dev a chance (and not take risks).
Thanks for reporting and thanks to NG moderation for the judgment call :3
#817526: Stolen from CharldeonMemed's YT channel.
Whoa, that was fast!
#817533: No animation.
#817531: Multiple resubmission.
At 10/7/21 12:33 PM, drizzile wrote:At 10/7/21 10:36 AM, DeepCrimson wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817533
#817533: No animation.
actually, it's a stolen meme that dates back to 2020
I'll admit I'm a bit behind on memes, been living under a rock for the past decade or so. Thanks.
Adult warning.
#817561, #817562: Stolen. Another suicide by cop attempt?
That was fast. Thanks NG moderation team. :3
Identical uploads from two different people. Which one do I shoot?
At 10/7/21 11:41 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817605
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817606
Identical uploads from two different people. Which one do I shoot?
pew pew pew.
I think one account is for SFW and one account is NSFW. Still cant submit duplicates, tho. I pew pew'd it.
At 10/8/21 12:52 AM, Exedor wrote:At 10/7/21 11:41 PM, Pokemonpoeguygcn wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817605pew pew pew.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817606
Identical uploads from two different people. Which one do I shoot?
I think one account is for SFW and one account is NSFW. Still cant submit duplicates, tho. I pew pew'd it.
So the answer was "both" :3
#817599: Gameplay footage.
#817625: Empty project in submission with fake medal.
http://uploads.ungrounded.net/alternate/1763000/1763406_alternate_157320_r1.zip/
is_published is true and description is self-explanatory so not an accident.
@Exedor Commander Exedor, any way to cancel a report? Charlie Emerson got me, heh. Thanks!
Edited the report on #817629 to false positive to make sure the NG moderation team doesn't waste their time on it. Please let me know if there's anything off, or if there's a better way to do it (other than obviously not jumping the gun, so I'll take the disciplinary action on the previous one!)
Went ahead and reported some of the crafty review replies we talked about in DMs using the review tree root with full details on the actual violation, Commander Exedor. *salutes*
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817494
#817494: Gameplay footage and Scratch URL is dead (404 from API).
http://uploads.ungrounded.net/alternate/1762000/1762768_alternate_157195_r1.zip/
https://api.scratch.mit.edu/projects/579785169
#817640: Resubmission of #817494, still dead.
Stolen.
Duplicate of penguin.
(Resubmissions were reported individually to avoid blams.)
Gameplay footage... How many of them get in the Portal every day?
At 10/8/21 02:55 PM, drizzile wrote:At 10/8/21 02:51 PM, DeepCrimson wrote:Gameplay footage... How many of them get in the Portal every day?
a huge influx of children who only know how youtube works that would show up after fnf blew up.
why can't people just read
Octillery Social Credit Test DX | Octillery VS Collection
You ever take a rat...cut it open, stick your pee pee in, let it live? You remind me of that rat.
Should be obvious. Nice 500k px canvas.
At 10/8/21 08:54 PM, drizzile wrote:At 10/8/21 08:16 PM, DeepCrimson wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817717
Should be obvious. Nice 500k px canvas.
jesus fucking christ
Oof, the wrapper is even bigger, lol.
Octillery Social Credit Test DX | Octillery VS Collection
You ever take a rat...cut it open, stick your pee pee in, let it live? You remind me of that rat.
At 10/9/21 05:28 AM, JoeyTheMarillFan wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817756
super mario 63 reupload, i think
It was stolen from another user. I think this is the original upload from 2009, by Runouw:
The reuploader liked it so much that he decided to steal it.
Don't know why the reuploader has an old version though, probably found it on some other website. Runouw's own submission is updated with new features.
At 10/9/21 05:38 AM, Mikoma wrote:At 10/9/21 05:28 AM, JoeyTheMarillFan wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817756
super mario 63 reupload, i think
It was stolen from another user. I think this is the original upload from 2009, by Runouw:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/498969
The reuploader liked it so much that he decided to steal it.
Don't know why the reuploader has an old version though, probably found it on some other website. Runouw's own submission is updated with new features.
Thanks for checking. Would this count as a valid submission with new content then?
#817761: No animation.
At 10/8/21 02:10 PM, DeepCrimson wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817678
Stolen. Thumb is SFW but adult warning.
@Exedor Heads-up on this one please, Commander Exedor?
Pretty sure this is stolen content from the paywalled version in the twitter link.
Either way, not the author's own submission.
At 10/9/21 06:41 AM, DeepCrimson wrote:At 10/9/21 05:38 AM, Mikoma wrote:Don't know why the reuploader has an old version though, probably found it on some other website. Runouw's own submission is updated with new features.Thanks for checking. Would this count as a valid submission with new content then?
You got it backwards, the original upload from 2009 has the new content. The reupload somehow has the old stuff prior to the updates.
And to answer your question: Assuming that a user updated it themselves. No, it is still stolen content. Even if a user adds their own features, they can't just take another person's content.
"Your submission must not be a modified version of someone else's work, including tutorial files."
You got it backwards, the original upload from 2009 has the new content. The reupload somehow has the old stuff prior to the updates.At 10/9/21 05:38 AM, Mikoma wrote:
And to answer your question: Assuming that a user updated it themselves. No, it is still stolen content. Even if a user adds their own features, they can't just take another person's content.
"Your submission must not be a modified version of someone else's work, including tutorial files."
Thanks for the clarification, Mikoma! *salutes*
Reporting if that's not already taken care of. Yeah, I see your point on this one now, the review makes it pretty obvious too.
(Should really not pull all-nighters on Portal Duty. This is not healthy!)
At 10/10/21 01:25 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote:Sex Movie (newgrounds.com)
Two frames with no animation.
I fapped.
JK, I v0ted, tho.
Found this Blender tutorial out in the wild. Been out for a few days. Thoughts?
CS - Musician, animator, and nostalgia enthusiast since 2020.
- they/she
At 10/10/21 04:17 AM, Anonymous-Frog wrote:https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/817565
Found this Blender tutorial out in the wild. Been out for a few days. Thoughts?
Saw this one too and decided to ignore it. Looks like a legit tutorial to me.
The author makes their own Blender stuff, but I'm not sure about the validity of the submission itself.
#817890: 4 seconds, 1 frame. No animation.
@Exedor Do we allow visualizers, Commander Exedor? The author doesn't seem to have submitted it in bad faith but double-checking just in case. Debatable as far as submission guidelines go but I'm not touching it for the time being.
#817902: Gameplay footage of the FNF sex mod. (Username was interesting btw.)
