At 11/17/16 09:45 AM, MchectorII wrote: I just want to confirm something,are these two accounts associated with shovelware?I remembered seeing more games:
Yes.
HO HO HOPE you become a Newgrounds Supporter this year!
We're working hard to give you the best site possible, but we have bills to pay and community support is vital to keep things going and growing. Thank you for considering!
At 11/17/16 10:11 AM, Asandir wrote:At 11/17/16 09:45 AM, MchectorII wrote: I just want to confirm something,are these two accounts associated with shovelware?I remembered seeing more games:Yes.
So that means ALL the games they submit are shovelware?Even if they are different?
At 11/17/16 10:13 AM, MchectorII wrote:At 11/17/16 10:11 AM, Asandir wrote:So that means ALL the games they submit are shovelware?Even if they are different?At 11/17/16 09:45 AM, MchectorII wrote: I just want to confirm something,are these two accounts associated with shovelware?I remembered seeing more games:Yes.
Probably yes
The cake is a liar!
This belongs to a shovelware account.
The cake is a liar!
I came across this game and it does not work at all.
-
Unpublished Submission
It's all shits and giggles until someone giggles and shits.
You still interested in abusive/useless reviews? This guy has a ton of one word garbage
At 11/20/16 11:10 AM, jonthomson wrote: You still interested in abusive/useless reviews?
This thread is for reporting Flash and Game submissions, not reviews, audio, or art.
At 11/20/16 11:10 AM, jonthomson wrote: You still interested in abusive/useless reviews? This guy has a ton of one word garbage
http://hammytechnoid.newgrounds.com/
EDIT: Users who flagged these reviews without reading them, and/or thinking about whether the review was a violation were punished.
At 11/20/16 03:21 PM, Exedor wrote: EDIT: Users who flagged these reviews without reading them, and/or thinking about whether the review was a violation were punished.
I thought one word reviews were classed as flaggable?
At 11/20/16 03:48 PM, Decky wrote: I thought one word reviews were classed as flaggable?
I would just mark them useless, honestly. On their own, I wouldn't say they're necessarily abusive.
Your source for monthly music producer freebies here // Take My Cymbals // ALL my big sample projects, FREE
I do professional audio critique & commissions. Catch me on YT and X! If you got music, I'll playlist you!
At 11/20/16 04:12 PM, EDM364 wrote:At 11/20/16 03:48 PM, Decky wrote: I thought one word reviews were classed as flaggable?I would just mark them useless, honestly. On their own, I wouldn't say they're necessarily abusive.
Yup. Just cuz it's one word doesn't mean it's flaggable. If one review is "Great!" and 5 stars, is that abusive? How about "Shit." and 0 stars? One word is not always auto-flaggable.
If we find a situation where many of the reviews were flagged solely because someone said they should be, the users are punished.
That "Great" example from above was an actual example, and the person that flagged that was indeed punished. When punished, you lose a bit of cred. If you do it enough, then your whistle rank drops to Garbage. If it's only occasional, then your correct flags surpass the hit and nothing notable shows on the whistle status. :)
At 11/20/16 04:45 PM, Exedor wrote: Yup. Just cuz it's one word doesn't mean it's flaggable. If one review is "Great!" and 5 stars, is that abusive? How about "Shit." and 0 stars? One word is not always auto-flaggable.
So, to be clear, 0 stars and "Shit" would be abusive, or no? I wish the review guidelines had examples of what constructive, useless, and abusive reviews look like.
If we find a situation where many of the reviews were flagged solely because someone said they should be, the users are punished.
This is essentially the reason the old abusive review thread was cleaned out, correct?
Your source for monthly music producer freebies here // Take My Cymbals // ALL my big sample projects, FREE
I do professional audio critique & commissions. Catch me on YT and X! If you got music, I'll playlist you!
At 11/21/16 12:36 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/684595
This plugin is not supported.
Hmm. Works for me. Unity plugin. Strange.
Your source for monthly music producer freebies here // Take My Cymbals // ALL my big sample projects, FREE
I do professional audio critique & commissions. Catch me on YT and X! If you got music, I'll playlist you!
At 11/21/16 02:50 AM, EDM364 wrote:At 11/21/16 12:36 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/684595Hmm. Works for me. Unity plugin. Strange.
This plugin is not supported.
Unity plugins are strange , and won't work for every browser.
At 11/21/16 03:05 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: Unity plugins are strange , and won't work for every browser.
I'm running Firefox. Runs for me, but the file size for such a small game is ridiculously big. Any unity game is like that, I notice. Bloat, bloat, bloat.
Your source for monthly music producer freebies here // Take My Cymbals // ALL my big sample projects, FREE
I do professional audio critique & commissions. Catch me on YT and X! If you got music, I'll playlist you!
At 11/21/16 03:57 AM, EDM364 wrote: I'm running Firefox. Runs for me, but the file size for such a small game is ridiculously big. Any unity game is like that, I notice. Bloat, bloat, bloat.
I've noted that myself. It's got the the point were most of the time I can't be bothered to wait for Unity games to load, I just move on to something else. I wish Flash hadn't died.
At 11/21/16 03:57 AM, EDM364 wrote:At 11/21/16 03:05 AM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: Unity plugins are strange , and won't work for every browser.I'm running Firefox. Runs for me, but the file size for such a small game is ridiculously big. Any unity game is like that, I notice. Bloat, bloat, bloat.
I agree. Anything that bloated does not deserve to pass. A waste of time and file size.
At 11/21/16 12:07 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: Anything that bloated does not deserve to pass. A waste of time and file size.
Let's not go that far.
At 11/21/16 01:44 PM, Decky wrote:At 11/21/16 12:07 PM, DoctorStrongbad wrote: Anything that bloated does not deserve to pass. A waste of time and file size.Let's not go that far.
Well, I gave it a r0und score, so we will see what happens.
Found another one with a questionable rating via the random button. It has censored nudity at the beginning despite being rated "E".
-
Unpublished Submission
This movie is made up of scenes from television shows.
At 11/22/16 12:22 AM, MchectorII wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/684651
This movie is made up of scenes from television shows.
Gone, thanks for the report.
At 11/22/16 01:46 AM, Asandir wrote:At 11/22/16 12:22 AM, MchectorII wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/684651Gone, thanks for the report.
This movie is made up of scenes from television shows.
Nah,it's nothing,just doing my duty.
"funny"
-
Unpublished Submission
-
Unpublished Submission
These belong on Vine or something.
At 11/22/16 10:45 PM, GUTHRIE wrote: "funny"
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/684687
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/684689
These belong on Vine or something.
Poopy poopie poooo. Yeah. They gone.
-
Unpublished Submission
And this was written in its description:
'This was originally created in back 2006, and was deleted by mods with no explanation given.
So, here it is again.'
I'm not sure if Rule 18 applies to submissions that were removed and not blammed.
:Do not re-submit your entry after it has been BLAMMED without making noticeable improvements.
At 11/23/16 05:32 PM, MchectorII wrote: And this was written in its description:
'This was originally created in back 2006, and was deleted by mods with no explanation given.
So, here it is again.'
Love it when they say things like that. Dum basses. Gone.
Do not re-submit your entry after it has been BLAMMED without making noticeable improvements.
If it was blammed and resubmitted, that's one thing. But when a mod removes something and they resubmit it, that means they're just ...well, see my previous comment.
