At 12/15/15 08:03 AM, Asandir wrote:

At 12/15/15 07:25 AM, gamejunkie wrote: Youtube material. Literally!
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/667476

Gone.

No surprise here, he re-submitted it.

At 12/15/15 09:28 AM, gamejunkie wrote: Aaaaargh! I wish I had never made the, 'Go and Vote!!!' thread now. I'm at 22 Saves and 1 Blam for the day, which is practically unheard of for me. I should have known the Vote 5 brigade would go mental with their voting. Just look at the scores of some of the shit that has passed judgement and you know it's fairly obvious that it's happening. Damn it!!

#Major Fail

Yeah, as soon as you made that thread I was thinking, 'nobody is going to take this seriously because so many of them like to act like assholes'. I'm sorry, buddy.

At 12/15/15 10:07 AM, gamejunkie wrote:

At 12/15/15 08:03 AM, Asandir wrote:

At 12/15/15 07:25 AM, gamejunkie wrote: Youtube material. Literally!
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/667476

Gone.

No surprise here, he re-submitted it.

I also re-unpublished it.

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

a wild juegos account appeared!

At 12/15/15 06:17 PM, jonthomson wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/667501
a wild juegos account appeared!

That's wild, it just disappeared!

At 12/15/15 06:44 PM, Asandir wrote:

At 12/15/15 06:17 PM, jonthomson wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/667501
a wild juegos account appeared!

*Cue Pokémon music*

That's wild, it just disappeared!

*wild juegos account fled!*

Sorry I had to. lol

At 12/15/15 10:05 AM, gamejunkie wrote: Guys/Men are notoriously bad for this. Ignoring pain and sickness. In general we just put up with whatever it is until it's unbearable. Then we go to the Doctor. It's not smart but it happens.

This is why a lot of guys just straight up have a heart attack in the home, or before they ever get seen about. Kinda sucks.

Funnily enough I had a bout of Pneumonia/Pleurisy recently (late June), it all started with a serious bout of Influenza that I let slide, you think I would have learned by now but No. Anyway that just fucking sucked, not much else I can say about it. Had a few days in hospital with tubes in most orifices. Far from pleasant.

I'm glad you survived. That stuff can be pretty killer. I had it once when I was sick, aggravated by my parents constantly smoking around me. Later found out that my allergies combined with that caused an upper respiratory infection that dribbled into my lungs for a nice dose of pneumonia. I was about six.

At 12/15/15 12:45 PM, DeftonesFan665 wrote: Yeah, as soon as you made that thread I was thinking, 'nobody is going to take this seriously because so many of them like to act like assholes'. I'm sorry, buddy.

Yeah, General kind of represents the worst of Newgrounds. Too many self-absorbed, sarcastic assholes. Could have gone worse than it did, to be fair.

At 12/15/15 06:57 PM, DeftonesFan665 wrote: Sorry I had to. lol

Lol, you guys make my day. Also, just passed the edit window for my last post. Sorry about that!

Get a load of these junk/abusive reviews. I'm not the greatest at whistling. Could someone point out what qualifies as abusive? Terms are a little lax. The 5's are obviously just junk, with maybe the exception of "Time to touch myself".

At 12/15/15 07:28 PM, EDM364 wrote:

At 12/15/15 06:57 PM, DeftonesFan665 wrote: Sorry I had to. lol

Lol, you guys make my day. Also, just passed the edit window for my last post. Sorry about that!

Get a load of these junk/abusive reviews. I'm not the greatest at whistling. Could someone point out what qualifies as abusive? Terms are a little lax. The 5's are obviously just junk, with maybe the exception of "Time to touch myself".

Abusive reviews are reviews that:
-insult the author or another user.
-Are chain spam or spam that is just nonsense, like several lines of the letter 'a' or something like that.
-Contain a link to a certain website that a user keeps putting into their reviews. This is usually someone trying to advertise a website. If someone has a review where they link to their YouTube channel or something harmless like that, it's NOT abusive, so don't flag those.

I went through all of that user's reviews and none are abusive. They're all useless, pathetic excuses for reviews. Especially all of those...fapping ones.

At 12/15/15 08:49 PM, DeftonesFan665 wrote: I went through all of that user's reviews and none are abusive. They're all useless, pathetic excuses for reviews. Especially all of those...fapping ones.

Thanks, mucho appreciated. I wish they'd expand the review abuse terms to include needlessly obscene reviews. I've seen a lot of things I really just want to unsee. I can see things getting a little hot and heavy in the adult section, but I've seen people fapping in the T section. Whatever floats their boat, I guess.

At 12/15/15 09:16 PM, EDM364 wrote:

At 12/15/15 08:49 PM, DeftonesFan665 wrote: I went through all of that user's reviews and none are abusive. They're all useless, pathetic excuses for reviews. Especially all of those...fapping ones.

Thanks, mucho appreciated.

No problem. :P

I wish they'd expand the review abuse terms to include needlessly obscene reviews. I've seen a lot of things I really just want to unsee. I can see things getting a little hot and heavy in the adult section, but I've seen people fapping in the T section. Whatever floats their boat, I guess.

Actually, I forgot something that counts as an abusive review. Some people on those Adult flashes sometimes say things like 'pm me if you want to have fun', so keep an eye out for those, too.

Also, if some of those reviews seem really obscene, message Exedor and ask his opinion. He might remove the really bad ones because he tries to do his best to remove the reviews of the sickos who type that they're masturbating or cumming, etc. in their reviews.

At 12/15/15 09:28 AM, gamejunkie wrote: I'm interested in your reactions.

xQ ~*#%*@

At 12/15/15 06:17 PM, jonthomson wrote: a wild juegos account appeared!

Asandir used *unpublish!*
It was super effective! :3

At 12/15/15 09:26 PM, DeftonesFan665 wrote: Actually, I forgot something that counts as an abusive review. Some people on those Adult flashes sometimes say things like 'pm me if you want to have fun', so keep an eye out for those, too.

Flaggable, and bannable if they get excessive with it.

Also, if some of those reviews seem really obscene, message Exedor and ask his opinion. He might remove the really bad ones because he tries to do his best to remove the reviews of the sickos who type that they're masturbating or cumming, etc. in their reviews.

Yup, we don't want to hear about your boner or your panties or how you just messed up your keyboard.

At 12/15/15 08:49 PM, DeftonesFan665 wrote: Abusive reviews are reviews that:
-insult the author or another user.

You're supposed to refer to the author only. It's 50/50 whether I'll remove someone referring to another user. ...well, 60/40.

-Are chain spam or spam that is just nonsense, like several lines of the letter 'a' or something like that.

Moderately sized or larger pictures made out of text. A :) is ok. A >_> is ok. A (o_o) is ok, as long as they don't do a whole lot of them, or in every single review. That gets annoying, like that XD guy.

-Contain a link to a certain website that a user keeps putting into their reviews. This is usually someone trying to advertise a website. If someone has a review where they link to their YouTube channel or something harmless like that, it's NOT abusive, so don't flag those.

I usually remove anything not Newgrounds related. I like rules and stuff all the time, but it's not something that takes anyone to another site. Youtube reviews are actually in a grey area. Even things like pic links posted in those darn Madness Scene Creator games get removed, so flag away.

I went through all of that user's reviews and none are abusive. They're all useless, pathetic excuses for reviews. Especially all of those...fapping ones.

I often have to stop myself while moderating and touch ... nevermind.

Wow! Just Wow! Okay I'm reporting it because of the obvious use of the Nintendo characters but give it a chance to be 'Bla***d' before you delete it please.

• Unpublished Submission

At 12/16/15 12:58 AM, gamejunkie wrote: Wow! Just Wow! Okay I'm reporting it because of the obvious use of the Nintendo characters but give it a chance to be 'Bla***d' before you delete it please.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/667519

It's going one way or another. I voted so let's see what happens...

At 12/16/15 12:58 AM, gamejunkie wrote: Wow! Just Wow! Okay I'm reporting it because of the obvious use of the Nintendo characters but give it a chance to be 'Bla***d' before you delete it please.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/667519

And it's not even playable really. Ewww. That's three appropriate votes, I'm assuming? :P

Q: Reporting because the use of Nintendo assets? I mean, plenty of people use them for sprite animations.

At 12/16/15 01:26 AM, EDM364 wrote: Q: Reporting because the use of Nintendo assets? I mean, plenty of people use them for sprite animations.

Not allowed in Games.

Happy 13th Anniversary to me!!!!!

At 12/16/15 01:28 AM, gamejunkie wrote: Not allowed in Games.

Happy 13th Anniversary to me!!!!!

Makes sense. People could cookie cut, paste some AS, and basically recreate them, now that making a platformer is so simple -- compared to the old days of actually having to hardcode everything.

In b4 @Exedor. LMAO! I've been wanting to do that for so long.

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

I'm not waiting for their next one, I'm sure you guys will clean it up before I get to it.

Fine then I'll post it anyway.

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

At 12/16/15 02:17 AM, gamejunkie wrote: Fine then I'll post it anyway.

...post what? Enagames doesn't have anything in their account.

At 12/16/15 02:23 AM, Exedor wrote:

At 12/16/15 02:17 AM, gamejunkie wrote: Fine then I'll post it anyway.

...post what? Enagames doesn't have anything in their account.

LMAO! Well Merry fucking Christmas to me.

At 12/16/15 02:24 AM, gamejunkie wrote: LMAO! Well Merry fucking Christmas to me.

Nah, I saw the list. You earned the regular Christmas. :3

At 12/16/15 02:27 AM, Exedor wrote:

At 12/16/15 02:24 AM, gamejunkie wrote: LMAO! Well Merry fucking Christmas to me.

Nah, I saw the list. You earned the regular Christmas. :3

Speaking of Christmas, nothing outright rulebreaking, but it's this guy again... with the garbage sounds and the terrible art. Granted, it's slightly better on the art end, but the "music" is still that crap he pastes into midi, looks like. I reviewed him last time and he "doesn't want to use music from NG". Jesus Christ.

• 

  Donz Christmas

  by ToonymanStudios

  How to Draw Show and Tells - S04E37 - Donz Christmas

  Movie

  1,168 Views

  (Everyone)

At 12/16/15 03:02 AM, EDM364 wrote: Speaking of Christmas, nothing outright rulebreaking, but it's this guy again... with the garbage sounds and the terrible art. Granted, it's slightly better on the art end, but the "music" is still that crap he pastes into midi, looks like. I reviewed him last time and he "doesn't want to use music from NG". Jesus Christ.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/667522

If it's not rule-breaking, then there's no need to report it. I talked to this guy a while back about his "show and tells" (or, 'speed paints' to the rest of us), and he doesn't seem to want to stop submitting, or change much about them. I suppose he'll improve with practice. ... ,':|

For now, he's ok to submit, so vote whatever your heart desires.

At 12/16/15 03:24 AM, Exedor wrote: or change much about them. I suppose he'll improve with practice. ... ,':|

I wonder if he'll eventually get to the point like those shovelware submitters and start filling the portal with two a day. Shared more because I was annoyed by the fact that he essentially refused a viable option of improving his work. Suppose he'll just keep getting another one of my strong suggestions in the review box every submission. I'm quite surprised stuff like this is getting through now.

At 12/16/15 01:01 AM, Exedor wrote:

At 12/16/15 12:58 AM, gamejunkie wrote: Wow! Just Wow! Okay I'm reporting it because of the obvious use of the Nintendo characters but give it a chance to be 'Bla***d' before you delete it please.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/667519

It's going one way or another. I voted so let's see what happens...

It's a broken game, so it's what the people love and will pass with flying colours. I got rid of this abomination now. Way too bad to give the Nintendo lawyers a chance to awake from their slumber to knock on Mr. Fulps door again.

I know this account has had all its stuff previously deleted hence why they currently only have 1 submission, this one. I could've sworn they were on MY list, alas they were not but alas they are now.

http://gracegirlsgames.newgrounds.com/

• 

  Super Dectetive 420

  by gracegirlsgames

  You got a job in top detective agency

  Game

  5,947 Views

  (Everyone)

At 12/16/15 04:06 AM, Asandir wrote: It's a broken game, so it's what the people love and will pass with flying colours. I got rid of this abomination now. Way too bad to give the Nintendo lawyers a chance to awake from their slumber to knock on Mr. Fulps door again.

Well damn, that's one less blam I'll be getting. Kidding. Not like half the users actually look at flashes lately.

What about these two? I'm sure you've seen, but the first one is a non-working alpha. Second one is the same buggy game with a menu applied, essentially. I know that reuploads of the exact same flash are delete-worthy. What about having two versions of the same game where virtually nothing was changed? Just trying to get a feel of the exact policies here. It's been a long time since I've frequented the barracks, and the portal has changed a lot.

• Unpublished Submission

• 

  PATRYOSKA !!

  by DjaydNova

  Patryoska is a russian doll traveling space to get BIGGER

  Game

  3,107 Views

  (Everyone)

I'm not sure how to define this. Corporate advertisement maybe ?

• 

  by <deleted>

  Under Judgment

  (Everyone)

At 12/16/15 06:33 AM, LexaHergon wrote: I'm not sure how to define this. Corporate advertisement maybe ?
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/667537

Sounds accurate to me. It's gone now.

At 12/16/15 04:47 AM, EDM364 wrote:

What about these two? I'm sure you've seen, but the first one is a non-working alpha. Second one is the same buggy game with a menu applied, essentially.

I got rid of the first one, since the second one actually kind of works and is just a straight upgrade of the first with the menu, an actual description and such.