Alright and guys is it ok if you guys help me achieve it and sure I'll get working on it right away.
Glamorous.
At 6/15/09 06:40 PM, KingExodus wrote: Alright and guys is it ok if you guys help me achieve it and sure I'll get working on it right away.
Yeah sure! Just read the faq. Don't flag anything but certainly abusive reviews.
Dexter Season 5: "Psychopaths in love. It's like Zodiac and Juliet."
Sure, no prob dude. What I did was I went to the submit content link right about the button labeled STORE and went to the bottom of the page and clicked on Random Flash Entry. Then I would look at the score and see how many reviews there are.
Best criteria for "fishing" as Mal so eloquently put it
1) 100+ reviews
2) an avg score of about 2.53-2.84 or less
3) stuff submitted by everyone's favorite troll, Chris Beer(Crbzk[his accounts get deleted pretty damn fast so you'll have to act faster] he also changes his name frequently as well. Just look for a Jimi Hendrix pic for an icon. That's his calling card)
4) anything from FF, DD, KK, some LL and CC, SS, they're always good cannon fodder for review fishing
Best things to look for when fishing
1) Someone talking to someone else about their review -- big no no
2) anything like "BLAM THIS!" or "GO DIE IN A HOLE YOU COCK FUCKING FAGGOT" things of that nature (to be more precise, anything that insults the author or are talking to other people)
3) (.)Y(.) (That's pics made from text and characters) Also a big no no
4) Something like this --> fhkal;fsfsafkasf;safj;afj or this zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz or this !!!!!!!!!!!
5) if you find an abusive review that you are sure is abusive, share it via PM or AIM(I prefer AIM for this part). The more people who flag it, the quicker it gets deleted and the more points you get.
That's about all I can think of at the moment. Does that help?
A another chris beer flash :::not a real flash:::: it's only a picture of the holocaust. Flag it.
Unsuitable, more holocaust pictures.
Same thing by Crbz, but with Tenacious D music.
He is quite the prick indeed.
The submissions are growing everyday, it's getting to summer time.
So how's the EGB's collective bits on the project coming along?
At 6/15/09 08:34 PM, SlntCobra1 wrote: So how's the EGB's collective bits on the project coming along?
Did i miss something while i was gone....because i don't recall anything like this. Care to emblish on it.
Shhhhh, it's an inside joke and you're on the outside. lmao. *Uses Jedi mind trick on you* This is not the question you should be asking.
I know not of this project of which you speak. So I'm not gonna tell you. MUAHAHAHAHA!!
Jk jk, Go to the EGB Private Forum for more info.
Intentional DP
Also check on page 1054 for the whole back story of this awesome idea.
This flash is full of WIN!!!
Sorry for the intentional DP. we really need an edit button on our posts if you ask me. >_>
At 6/15/09 03:00 PM, SlntCobra1 wrote: Well within reason yes, but I still feel like it'd be infringing on our IV Amendment rights. That's just how I feel as a US Citizen.
I'd just like to put my oar in here as a concerned individual.
I hate it when people try to hide behind constitutional law. On the internet, where most countries laws can be openly flouted, the right to privacy should not be quoted for use within your public profile. The right to freedom of speech may be something that gets called into question, but when we're talking about your public face on Newgrounds, there has to be a degree of control and / or "Big Brother" tactics.
BonusStage had a banner that was clearly taken from a porn movie and this did not break any rules, because it didn't show anything that would not have been legal for a minor to view. Sure, it was suggestive, but I view that as artistic licence. If anyone posts links to websites of an illegal nature under US Law, Newgrounds would tell them to remove them, or risk being banned, having their account removed, or the like. This is because NG has to obey the laws of the US, since they host from within the USA.
If you find that people are breaking the rules, by posting offensive images, malicious links and the like, please PM Wade and he can take it up with the individual if the need arises. At the end of the day, the accounts are issued by Newgrounds as a show of trust. Newgrounds gives you access to their site and forums with the trust that you will not post things like Child Abuse all over it. Failure to comply with these rules will see the offending material deleted along with your account, possibly.
****POSSIBLY STOLEN****
I know for a fact this user did not make this, as there is YouTube footage of people playing this gsme in 2008.
Can I get a verdict?
-----STOLEN FLASH REPORT-----
It's the original Rick Roll from either
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRH A0
or
.
Glamorous.
-----MAYBE STOLEN FLASH ALERT-----
I'm not sure from where that clip is but it's definitely stolen.
Glamorous.
-----STOLEN FLASH ALERT-----
Domain on Youtube would be
www.youtube.com/watch?v=n61Du5lhWio
or from
Oh and sorry for the double post.
Glamorous.
****MALICIOUS FLASH ALERT****
Re-submitted:
Disguised as something else.
Previously blammed: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/49 9683
Good job on the flagging guys i would like to figuratively give you guys the thumbs up. Good thing i voted 0s and 1s on them.
About the collaboration on the flash the majority of us are being a part of. I will be helping pudding with the story and i have pm'd him my ideas for improvement on it and how to do so on it. I like and am good at writing short storys and poems so i should fit right in doing this.
Good work finding all of those abusive flashes I have seen Chris Beer submit the same one again and again. I think that having mods check over your user page is okay as you say I have seen some gross NSFW images on some people's profiles like Goatse or hardcore images of porn. Cereal had a picture of a man which was pornographic for ages before it got deleted. Anyway I guess you may have noticed the latest in The series by HotDiggedyDemon called Junior pretty good and the adding of voices is a cool touch.
Archer I'm a good shot!
At 6/16/09 08:50 PM, CaseyFletcher wrote: we need 2 blam OO PP RR FFF KK DD n FF
Buddy, you're in the wrong place. This ain't no blam squad - this here's the EGB, and the one thing that is certainly forbidden is mass voting, either up or down. Our job here is to stop the crud as it comes in - but we do it one flash at a time, based on it's own merit. Every once in a while one of those clubs actually submits something that isn't crap - and just because the 99 before it was spam doesn't mean we can blindly blam this one.
I suggest you read our guidelines before you post like that again in this forum. You're way outta line, mistah!
I seriously doubt this game is his because this is his first submission and he says in his dercription for games like this go to "website name here". I'm not sure but it looks to be the case.
Dexter Season 5: "Psychopaths in love. It's like Zodiac and Juliet."
Woot, underdog was not only stolen this week, but it also prevented me from winning underdog. Not saying that I would have won underdog, but I was one of the contenders for sure. I don't mind losing to someone who did it the honest way, but losing to someone that cheated really upsets me. Almost makes me not want to try and make movies anymore because they just go unnoticed. It's the 2nd time it's been stolen from me like that.
Starting Saturday I'm going to keep a list of every spam submission so I can watch them right up until the awards. If anything like this starts to happen I will be able to PM a review mod or talk to one on AIM very quickly. Not under my watch again. I've had it up to here and I'm going to do something about it now.
Good to hear Corky. Why didn't you try to be proactive about it beforehand though? You'd think being proactive about something is the better way to go than to be reactive. At leas in the police subculture it's more productive to be proactive. Krev, you agree, right?
At 6/17/09 01:25 AM, SlntCobra1 wrote: Good to hear Corky. Why didn't you try to be proactive about it beforehand though? You'd think being proactive about something is the better way to go than to be reactive. At leas in the police subculture it's more productive to be proactive. Krev, you agree, right?
Because with dial up and due to the fact that I'm only on when I first wake up and before I go to bed it's impossible for me to go look for every spam submission submitted over a week. Hell it can take me 10 minutes to even deposit my experience for the day.
Going back to college Friday and even though I'm working I don't think it will take too long if I look for about 10 to 20 minutes a night. Something that I can do while doing my daily reviewing and B/Ping.
At 6/17/09 12:11 AM, KrevZabijak wrote: I'ma cutcha wit mah hobo bottle.
Ah, so that's where that empty bottle went! I thought you threw that out to hide the evidence of.... oh, did I say too much? Sorry ;) (that is our little secret now, isn't it???)
Congrats on the level up! And keep fighting the good fight!
At 6/17/09 12:11 AM, KrevZabijak wrote: I'ma cutcha wit mah hobo bottle.
I'm going to butcher you with my new knife... I think i can deal with this level for 70 more days.
At 6/17/09 04:28 AM, THENEWFIGHTER wrote: sir
private new reporting in!
I think you misunderstood something here. See private is not what you are thinking, you actually have to be a private in B/p points or 2,500 blams/saves. List is here, you also need to have a bronze whistle to enter this club so you have some work on your hands there. I'm sure you can do it.
Just reporting in to say I have attained a Silver Whistle! Keep it up, everyone.
Good job on the level up Buster and congrats on the silver whistle Cnimefan, Krev and I were flagging reviews left by alts on two DD submissions this morning around 1-2 AM NG time. It was roughly 58 abusive reviews. Still at a bronze whistle though, I should be closer to getting a silver with those 58 under my belt.
