At 8/4/06 02:49 AM, Agak wrote:
At 8/3/06 08:28 AM, milinko959 wrote:
I am voting not to count audio as a separate stat...but I don't care.
Well, I just don't think tom would change it back. Still, if it was up to me, I'd keep it, since it looks cool on your profile, plus it makes the audio portal A LOT more popular.
Looks like the boys in administration are finally acting on the potential of the audio portal, after years of neglect!
This little alteration in our profiles is going to increase audio portal activity by hundreds if not thousands of percent in my opinion, and I'd like to see some sort of figures relating to that topic in a few months when a lot more people get involved in the audio reviewing spree!
Anyhoo, concerning the 'top audio reviewers' list, I'd definately go for a top 50 more than anything else... number 100 will probably only be at less than 100 reviews anyway, making the list really uncompetitive for a while.
So yeah, if people are wanting to make a list of the top audio reviewers, don't sweat it on making a top 100 list for a while... it seems like a bit of a waste of time to jump on another top 100+ ranking list at this time.
well, there's my verbal diarrhea, laters :O