At 10/22/04 12:15 PM, vegeto122 wrote: your just a big show off if you think your so cool.im not trying to pick a fight with you but i think your showing off.and people like that tick me off!!!

1) WTF is that supposed to mean?!? STFU, and go away.
2) Stop attaching pictures. You'll quickly find yourself unable to access the forums due to a forum ban.
3) Try typing in intelligible English. I looked at your two other posts, and you type like a monkey with 9 broken fingers. If you actually put forth an effort to sound more intelligent (you know, above the IQ of a rock), then people might take you seriously.

At 10/22/04 12:35 PM, D0GMA wrote:
If any change is going to occur, it would most likely be in adding a few middling ranks to the BPs, which would push the requirements for the higher ranks up, and change the VP% scaling. Beyond that, there's not much that's feasible without a complete overhaul of a system that's worked fine up until now.

Not going to happen. Even if there were to be more ranks added the max Bonus precentage would be 60%. That came right from the admins.

Repost:
(D0GMAsaid real cool stuff)

(Level 30 XP - 400)/21 = level split

((Target level - 9) * level split) + 400 = level requirement

More levels increases the denominator of 21, but does exactly nothing else.

Ok I like you fomula...looks like the one I made ages ago.

If there were 50 levels. made today.(the underline represents it repeats those number over and over)
(17616-400)/21=419.902439
(23-9)*419.902439+400=5887.634

Using those number I would be past level 23. I would accually be level 35. All that would change would be my level, not my vp. All adding more levels would do is make it easier to level. It ould not really effect anything else cause instead of the 819exp now needed from level to level it would be 419.

At 10/22/04 01:33 PM, ramagi wrote:

At 10/22/04 12:35 PM, D0GMA wrote:
If any change is going to occur, it would most likely be in adding a few middling ranks to the BPs, which would push the requirements for the higher ranks up, and change the VP% scaling. Beyond that, there's not much that's feasible without a complete overhaul of a system that's worked fine up until now.

Not going to happen. Even if there were to be more ranks added the max Bonus precentage would be 60%. That came right from the admins.

They could add higher ranks for people that are already egsc without adding anything to the vp. Here's what it could look like:

Elite Guard Supreme Commander : 60% 30000b/p pts
next rank: still 60% 40 000 b/p pts
next rank: still 60% 50 000 b/p pts
etc until 100 000 b/p pts
It wouldn't add some voting power but at least we will have a new picture for each rank so it can motivate b/p voters already above 30 000 b/p pts.

Waiting for a bashing reply that will tell me that without a bonus for vp, it would be pointless... yep, I'm expecting a reply like that and I will happen!!

At 10/22/04 01:43 PM, EKRegulus wrote:

At 10/22/04 01:33 PM, ramagi wrote:

At 10/22/04 12:35 PM, D0GMA wrote:
If any change is going to occur, it would most likely be in adding a few middling ranks to the BPs, which would push the requirements for the higher ranks up, and change the VP% scaling. Beyond that, there's not much that's feasible without a complete overhaul of a system that's worked fine up until now.

Not going to happen. Even if there were to be more ranks added the max Bonus precentage would be 60%. That came right from the admins.

They could add higher ranks for people that are already egsc without adding anything to the vp. Here's what it could look like:

Elite Guard Supreme Commander : 60% 30000b/p pts
next rank: still 60% 40 000 b/p pts
next rank: still 60% 50 000 b/p pts
etc until 100 000 b/p pts
It wouldn't add some voting power but at least we will have a new picture for each rank so it can motivate b/p voters already above 30 000 b/p pts.

Waiting for a bashing reply that will tell me that without a bonus for vp, it would be pointless... yep, I'm expecting a reply like that and I will happen!!

I think that's a good idea, but it would be a good idea to give that user some sort of credit for reaching that amount of b/p.. that would take a lot of a person's time to get that amount and they should deserve more VP. But the idea of having a new pic for each rank after 30k b/p's would be nice.

At 10/22/04 01:43 PM, EKRegulus wrote: Waiting for a bashing reply that will tell me that without a bonus for vp, it would be pointless... yep, I'm expecting a reply like that and I will happen!!

I meant "it will happen", not I will happen...

Posted: 10/22/04 01:48 PM by Yoink_vines
I think that's a good idea, but it would be a good idea to give that user : some sort of credit for reaching that amount of b/p.. that would take a : lot of a person's time to get that amount and they should deserve : : : : : : more VP. But the idea of having a new pic for each rank after 30k b/p's : would be nice.

It's good to see that someone here likes my idea... everyone wants more vp but the admins refused our request once and they will probably refuse it again so asking a second time for more vp is pointless.

At 10/22/04 01:30 PM, Shat_the_Kat wrote: 2) Stop attaching pictures. You'll quickly find yourself unable to access the forums due to a forum ban.

Don't you mean BIZZZZARRRRO forum ban?

WTF? There's pictures flying off the walls here...
I hope this post will exorcise it...
OMG LOOK!

At 10/22/04 01:33 PM, ramagi wrote:

At 10/22/04 12:35 PM, D0GMA wrote:
If any change is going to occur, it would most likely be in adding a few middling ranks to the BPs, which would push the requirements for the higher ranks up, and change the VP% scaling. Beyond that, there's not much that's feasible without a complete overhaul of a system that's worked fine up until now.

Not going to happen. Even if there were to be more ranks added the max Bonus precentage would be 60%. That came right from the admins.

I presumed max was going to be 60%, that was why I was talking about inserting ranks and said "and change the VP scaling" ... meaning that on the way to SC and 60% things wouldn't be the same.

By inserting something like say a 5-star General and Field Marshal between General and SC you can bump up the requirement for SC without affecting the VP values.

Instead of (correct values quoted, not the FAQ numbers):

22 19,500-21,499 44% Elite Guard Brigadier General
23 21,500-23,499 46% Elite Guard Major General
24 23,500-25,499 48% Elite Guard Lieutenant General
25 25,500-29,999 55% Elite Guard General
26 30,000 + 60% Elite Guard Supreme Commander

you get:

22 19,500-21,499 44% Elite Guard Brigadier General
23 21,500-23,499 46% Elite Guard Major General
24 23,500-25,499 48% Elite Guard Lieutenant General
25 25,500-29,999 51% Elite Guard General
26 30,000-37,499 54% Elite Guard 5-Star General
27 37,500-49,999 57% Elite Guard Field Marshall
28 50,000 + 60% Elite Guard Supreme Commander

Three other ranks could readily be similarly stuffed in the lower ranks, further increasing the SC requirement, and by dropping the +% to 2 across the board it would still not force the VP bonus above 60.

The real problem with any idea like this is that it penalizes people like Crono and Joe, who are still here, but stopped BPing since they already had the final rank.

Repost:
(D0GMAsaid real cool stuff)

(Level 30 XP - 400)/21 = level split

((Target level - 9) * level split) + 400 = level requirement

More levels increases the denominator of 21, but does exactly nothing else.

Ok I like you fomula...looks like the one I made ages ago.

LOL wish I knew about that earlier; it would have saved me the hassle of trying to figure out the math behind the levels. I knew it had to be something fairly simple, but I kept getting sidetracked because of the variable increases.

If there were 50 levels. made today.(the underline represents it repeats those number over and over)
(17616-400)/21=419.902439
(23-9)*419.902439+400=5887.634

Using those number I would be past level 23. I would accually be level 35.

Heh ... finally you saved me from doing the math. What you worked out would have me at 22 ^^

At 10/22/04 01:43 PM, EKRegulus wrote:
They could add higher ranks for people that are already egsc without adding anything to the vp.

Interesting idea ... but if you're already Supreme how do you go up? IF any alterations were made, your idea would be the easiest to implement. The trouble is, it doesn't really do anything except add icons (just like adding more levels), so why bother?

At 10/22/04 01:59 PM, EKRegulus wrote: It's good to see that someone here likes my idea... everyone wants more vp but the admins refused our request once and they will probably refuse it again so asking a second time for more vp is pointless.

Trust me it is pointless. They were reluctant about the 60% two years ago, whn this system came out. I won't bash you.
It is currently pointless to really to go past 30K, yet others and I still contiue to get poitns while others don't.
If they were to make more ranks, which I highly doubt. I think they would rather raise the amount for EGSC. I think it would be pointless to put more ranks in with the current system, I thought all the ranks were relitivly easy to get the only big gap was the last one. Now if thay raised the amount from 30K to say 40K or 50K would have to change all the other ranks and how many points it takes to get them. They would keep the percentage the same for the ranks. Or they could add more ranks by doubling pointes needed for the last one and double numebr of ranks keeppign 60% as th top percentage and reducing the percebntage increase in half. I'll stop rambling at this point

At 10/22/04 03:44 PM, D0GMA wrote: Interesting idea ... but if you're already Supreme how do you go up? IF any alterations were made, your idea would be the easiest to implement. The trouble is, it doesn't really do anything except add icons (just like adding more levels), so why bother?

Instead of being generals, people that would get a higher rank than egsc would be "presidents" or "voting gods", etc. We could easily find somthing that means higher than the army.

We need to get as many ideas as we can so if they refuse one of them, we still have other suggestions for them. I know that mine isn't really interesting but it's better than nothing. The fact that it's easy to implement gives it a great chance to become real.

Oh Dogma.. the famous "why bother?" reply! That's something we don't need. That's the sentence for lazy people, not us.

Posted: 10/22/04 03:44 PM by ramagi
Trust me it is pointless. They were reluctant about the 60% two years ago, whn this system came out. I won't bash you.

It is currently pointless to really to go past 30K, yet others and I still contiue to get poitns while others don't.

What are they afraid of? People with too much voting power that could easily change the score of new entries? ummm maybe that's the reason

At 10/22/04 03:44 PM, D0GMA wrote:

:: By inserting something like say a 5-star General and Field Marshal between General and SC you can bump up the requirement for SC without affecting the VP values.

Instead of (correct values quoted, not the FAQ numbers):

22 19,500-21,499 44% Elite Guard Brigadier General
23 21,500-23,499 46% Elite Guard Major General
24 23,500-25,499 48% Elite Guard Lieutenant General
25 25,500-29,999 55% Elite Guard General
26 30,000 + 60% Elite Guard Supreme Commander

you get:

22 19,500-21,499 44% Elite Guard Brigadier General
23 21,500-23,499 46% Elite Guard Major General
24 23,500-25,499 48% Elite Guard Lieutenant General
25 25,500-29,999 51% Elite Guard General
26 30,000-37,499 54% Elite Guard 5-Star General
27 37,500-49,999 57% Elite Guard Field Marshall
28 50,000 + 60% Elite Guard Supreme Commander

Three other ranks could readily be similarly stuffed in the lower ranks, further increasing the SC requirement, and by dropping the +% to 2 across the board it would still not force the VP bonus above 60.

Stop thinking like me, Damn I wish shelteredlife never went away some days. You would have loved my topic back then. I had a lot of data like this there.

The real problem with any idea like this is that it penalizes people like Crono and Joe, who are still here, but stopped BPing since they already had the final rank.

That is true, it would hurt the ones that have stopped.

Heh ... finally you saved me from doing the math. What you worked out would have me at 22 ^^

I did that math a year ago when I tried to pitch the idea of more levels to Wade. WHich the response I got was, they would think about it. :/

At 10/22/04 03:44 PM, ramagi wrote: I'll stop rambling at this point

From now on, thou shalt be known as: ramagi the rambler 8)

I agree with what you & D0GMA are saying though. There's no need for a change in ranks. BUT the system does favour people who've been on NG for a long time, which in one way is fair, but in another way is not.

Shit, I forgot to say it in my last post. Thanks EK & D0GMA for the great reviews on Overrun, and thanks to anyone else who voted high on it. I'm considering starting a new Wi/Ht thread for suggestion/comments on the (future development of the) game - smart idea? or stupid idea? Please respond.

Oh yeah, and for those who don't visit D0GMA's 51+ thread, have a listen to this - you might find it slightly amusing
</ selfpromotion>

sorry

At 10/22/04 04:25 PM, Denvish wrote: Shit, I forgot to say it in my last post. Thanks EK & D0GMA for the great reviews on Overrun, and thanks to anyone else who voted high on it. I'm considering starting a new Wi/Ht thread for suggestion/comments on the (future development of the) game - smart idea? or stupid idea? Please respond.

Oh yeah, and for those who don't visit D0GMA's 51+ thread, have a listen to this - you might find it slightly amusing
</ selfpromotion>

sorry

I saw it, I was goign to do a review earlier, but got side tracked. I was going to do a couple sugestions there.

At 10/22/04 04:17 PM, Denvish wrote: I couldn't care less about what denvish just typed BUT

I noticed the change denvish! Thx for making it more difficult. Now, your game will easily make it to front page and when flashes make it there, the score usually gets a boost so you might taste the top50 for a while.

Instead of 200 000 pts and quitting the game before I lose only one live, I died at 14500 pts.... that's a huge difference. Although, I only tried once with the new level of difficulty so I'm probably to get a much higher score.

It's better and much more challenging than defend your castle or doomed :O
Great job.

The only reason why I type that here is because I can't review twice :D and I know that you browse this thread everyday.

At 10/22/04 04:25 PM, Denvish wrote: I love you all and /self-promotion

How dare you post at the same time as me. If I saw that post, I would reply to this one instead of the previous one.

At 10/22/04 04:12 PM, EKRegulus wrote:
Oh Dogma.. the famous "why bother?" reply! That's something we don't need. That's the sentence for lazy people, not us.

Above, I sketched out my concept of new BP ranks. "Why bother," is not laziness, it's logic and motivation.

If a list provides no useful information, there is no point in expending the effort required to create and maintain the list.

If adding more experience levels or BP ranks has no real effect, there is no point in creating the graphics and revamping the coding required to implement them.

If there's no point in implementing a concept, make a new idea. You need to play devil's advocate on yourself more often, I enjoy it when I have to work to find something wrong with a plan.

What are they afraid of? People with too much voting power that could easily change the score of new entries? ummm maybe that's the reason

The fear is most likely that it's a slippery slope. Once you establish the precedent that you are willing to make changes to the basis of how part of a system works, the flood gates are open. What about here? Or here? Why here, but not here? ad infinitum

At 10/22/04 04:15 PM, ramagi wrote:

Heh ... finally you saved me from doing the math. What you worked out would have me at 22 ^^

I did that math a year ago when I tried to pitch the idea of more levels to Wade. WHich the response I got was, they would think about it. :/

I was referring to the math you worked out that I quoted ... To make level 23, one would need 5887 XP, with 419 XP splits. Since I have 5635 X ...

At 10/22/04 04:25 PM, Denvish wrote: Thanks EK & D0GMA for the great reviews on Overrun, and thanks to anyone else who voted high on it.

No problem. If I'm going to take the time to write a review, I usually try to make it something worth reading =)

I'm considering starting a new Wi/Ht thread for suggestion/comments on the (future development of the) game - smart idea? or stupid idea? Please respond.

For now, I'd say hold off on it and see how it finishes the week. If, as is, it's a really popular game (lots of views, etc), then have it at.

Fixes that don't affect gameplay, like those I mentioned should just get uploaded to replace the existing flash. If you decide to make substantive game changes, like increasing the difficulty level, I'd rather it go into a separate entry. Mk1/Fuel was pretty challenging to me, but I can see why people were saying that Panic level was a bit too easy.

I went back and played it with my task manager up after I read some of your replies. I'm on a 2.8GHz laptop and had similar numbers. Base was 11%, 54% with the game running. If the only thing someone is doing is the game, you could add some more to it, but slower computers, like my PCs, won't do very well with it even as it is.

At 10/22/04 04:54 PM, D0GMA wrote:

Oh Dogma.. the famous "why bother?" reply! That's something we don't need. That's the sentence for lazy people, not us.

Above, I sketched out my concept of new BP ranks. "Why bother," is not laziness, it's logic and motivation.
If a list provides no useful information, there is no point in expending the effort required to create and maintain the list.
If adding more experience levels or BP ranks has no real effect, there is no point in creating the graphics and revamping the coding required to implement them.
If there's no point in implementing a concept, make a new idea. You need to play devil's advocate on yourself more often, I enjoy it when I have to work to find something wrong with a plan.

ok, ok I will find a better idea. It's maybe an uncessary change but I just wanted to contribute. Admins already stated that most changes mentionned in the past won't be accepted so I tried something "new" (is it new?). My idea was very simple and easy to implement, too bad it's almost pointless. I was sure that it could give a minimum of motivation for egsc users. :(

The fear is most likely that it's a slippery slope. Once you establish the precedent that you are willing to make changes to the basis of how part of a system works, the flood gates are open. What about here? Or here? Why here, but not here? ad infinitum

That seems true. I guess that we will need to wait until Lijim changes his mind or find a new possible modification that he likes. Right now, we still give him those suggestions, he just refuses them but one day he might accept some of those. I doubt that the stat system will never be modified. It was modified earlier, why not later?

Let's be patient and keep accumulating the ideas until we see an opening and then he will decide which ones he will consider and which ones will stay in the garbage.

13,337 blams! Yay and stuff!

Congrats to Kat for EGMS and 7VP, and no congrats to Eldarion for being evil.

At 10/22/04 09:18 AM, XkwiziTOnE wrote:

At 10/21/04 08:00 PM, Qwoxyl wrote: And hello to X.

And a Hello to you Q.

You called me Q. I'm glad we had this talk.

At 10/22/04 04:25 PM, Denvish wrote: Shit, I forgot to say it in my last post. Thanks EK & D0GMA for the great reviews on Overrun, and thanks to anyone else who voted high on it. I'm considering starting a new Wi/Ht thread for suggestion/comments on the (future development of the) game - smart idea? or stupid idea? Please respond.

Smart idea, I haven't played it yet, and we can only review your game once, which doesn't help if we find a bug later on.

Oh yeah, and for those who don't visit D0GMA's 51+ thread, have a listen to this - you might find it slightly amusing

Amusing it is, 5!

At 10/22/04 04:54 PM, D0GMA wrote: I went back and played it with my task manager up after I read some of your replies. I'm on a 2.8GHz laptop and had similar numbers. Base was 11%, 54% with the game running. If the only thing someone is doing is the game, you could add some more to it, but slower computers, like my PCs, won't do very well with it even as it is.

Yeah. I don't know how much I could improve on that. Not wanting to get too technical, but the enemies have to move with the backdrop ( which is moving every time an arrow key is pressed), as well as expanding in themselves & replacing themselves when they're killed/hit you. With 9+ enemies on-screen, that takes some major CPU power. I can improve the endmovie & other peripheral bits, but I'm extremely cautious about adding anything else to the gameplay. Which is a shame, because there's so much more that could be added.
I actually started the game before my AWOL period, but gave up on it because the AS problems associated with doing that pseudo-360° rotate with the background, and keeping the fiends with it, were just too much for my AS skills. It's extremely fulfilling to have finished & submitted it though, and the score is a major bonus.
Anyhow, I'll shut up now. The LUL is not really a place for this (which is why I was considering a new thread). The game has been developed in virtual solitude, so once again, thanks for the feedback.

Hey Denvish...

I just listened to "Going down to Newgrounds"

Damn it if I can't hear half of the words...I'm almost saddened because I know it has some great humor in it, yet, the vocals are so low.

If you have another copy of it that I can tweak, I would greatly appreciate it. I'll listen to the tweaked one, and review your NG submission. For fairness, of course.

My last three songs I made had the same problem (although, the problem may just be in my head)...the vocals were mastered too low, and I am gonna have to go back and re-master it to bring the vocals up (as well as the bass which could use some kick too).

Muahahaha I get to be in BOLD on the Pen10K now

At 10/22/04 07:21 PM, RedCircle wrote: Damn it if I can't hear half of the words...I'm almost saddened because I know it has some great humor in it, yet, the vocals are so low.

Yeah. I didn't take as much I should have encoding & checking it. I'm going to submit an alt. mix tomorrow - pain having almost identical entries on the AP, but that's what you get for not having an update option like you have on the FP.
Lyrics are in D0GMA's BP 51+ thread
Must sleep.... good night all

At 10/22/04 03:44 PM, D0GMA wrote: 22 19,500-21,499 44% Elite Guard Brigadier General
23 21,500-23,499 46% Elite Guard Major General
24 23,500-25,499 48% Elite Guard Lieutenant General
25 25,500-29,999 51% Elite Guard General
26 30,000-37,499 54% Elite Guard 5-Star General
27 37,500-49,999 57% Elite Guard Field Marshall
28 50,000 + 60% Elite Guard Supreme Commander

I wouldn't mind this one bit. It doesn't screw over the vp system, it would be relatively easy to implement, and most people would get some fun out of it.

At 10/22/04 04:12 PM, EKRegulus wrote: Instead of being generals, people that would get a higher rank than egsc would be "presidents" or "voting gods", etc. We could easily find somthing that means higher than the army.

Although there most likely won't ever be a rank higher than Supreme Commander I've always toyed around with having a set of "Royal Guard" ranks if some beyond SC were brought into play. (the highest being Royal Guard Czar or something like that)

At 10/22/04 04:25 PM, Denvish wrote: Shit, I forgot to say it in my last post. Thanks EK & D0GMA for the great reviews on Overrun

I just unlocked panic mode, so far the game plays great. Good job on it and your great score as of now.

Oh yeah, and for those who don't visit D0GMA's 51+ thread, have a listen to this - you might find it slightly amusing
</ selfpromotion>

Listened and liked although like RC said, the vocals were tough to make out in a few parts.

At 10/22/04 05:22 PM, Qwoxyl wrote: 13,337 blams! Yay and stuff!

Very 1337 Q.

At 10/22/04 08:12 PM, D0GMA wrote: Muahahaha I get to be in BOLD on the Pen10K now

Very nice congrats for 10k saves and grabbing the lucky 7th spot on the list. After I hit SC my next major b/p goal is 10k saves, so it is safe to say I am envious of your P count.

At 10/20/04 09:08 PM, Recon_Rebel wrote:

At 10/20/04 03:58 PM, leeboy105 wrote:

At 10/20/04 02:33 PM, D0GMA wrote: there was a thread asking what ever happened to Zhu, of Xiao Xiao fame.

I don't quite understand how you could copyright a stick figure.

What a joke. That's like trying to copyright sliced bread.

Well, in late 2003 some aussie applied for, and was granted, Australian patents on both Fire and the Wheel!
Both copyrights were soon revoked amid the publicity. The man who filed for the patents claimed he did so only out of protest over the ignorance of his government, and never actually expected them to pass

At 10/22/04 08:12 PM, D0GMA wrote: Muahahaha I get to be in BOLD on the Pen10K now

good on ya. thats a nice effort.
yesterday i got 60 posts, my post ever in a day... that now equals the max amount of reviews i've ever gotten in a day! haha.
and about 20 minutes ago i reached 6,550 b/p points, lol...

yesterday i wrote:
and yesterday i got 6,500 b/p points!
D0GMA (i think) then wrote:
not bad considering only 160 were submitted!

hahaha, well, ya know what i mean :P

Well congratz to Qwoxyl and DOgma. If I missed anyone congratz to them.

At 10/22/04 10:33 PM, ramagi wrote: Well congratz to Qwoxyl and DOgma. If I missed anyone congratz to them.

like YAH!!
hahaha.
yeh, i did forget to give congrats to those people, well done to the 1337-Qwox man, and D0GMA for finally getting bold on the penta.

At 10/22/04 05:22 PM, Qwoxyl wrote: 13,337 blams! Yay and stuff!

Grats =)

At 10/22/04 05:28 PM, Denvish wrote: Anyhow, I'll shut up now. The LUL is not really a place for this (which is why I was considering a new thread). The game has been developed in virtual solitude, so once again, thanks for the feedback.

The way it's going, I'd say have at it making a thread for it. You might actually be better off making a thread in General. You'll get the usual round of useless drivel anything in General receives, but you'd get constructive comments from a lot of people you otherwise wouldn't. This thread thing may grow into its OWN project lol

At 10/22/04 06:56 PM, FBIpolux wrote: OMFG there's too much maths down there... Stop it 5 minutes O_O.

UP there ... and no :-P~~~

At 10/22/04 08:17 PM, BonusStage wrote:

At 10/22/04 08:12 PM, D0GMA wrote: Muahahaha I get to be in BOLD on the Pen10K now

heh omg lucky d0gma :D

Took hours to get the last 5 lol Bob's flash was preceded by 4 blams and followed by another 10 ... been like that most of the night.

At 10/22/04 08:51 PM, MPA wrote: Very nice congrats for 10k saves and grabbing the lucky 7th spot on the list.

Joe made it easy to pass him ;)

After I hit SC my next major b/p goal is 10k saves, so it is safe to say I am envious of your P count.

Didn't you get the memo? After leeboy makes it, we're locking the gate ....

At 10/22/04 10:25 PM, M-A-R-C-U-S wrote:

At 10/22/04 08:12 PM, D0GMA wrote: Muahahaha I get to be in BOLD on the Pen10K now

good on ya. thats a nice effort.

Thanks much =)

yesterday i got 60 posts, my post ever in a day... that now equals the max amount of reviews i've ever gotten in a day! haha.

Reviews > forum spam

Just make sure you take the time to write something constructive. Too many people are seeing their review count like a post count ... just more spam.

yesterday i wrote:
and yesterday i got 6,500 b/p points!
D0GMA (i think) then wrote:
not bad considering only 160 were submitted!

hahaha, well, ya know what i mean :P

^^ busted

and D0GMA for finally getting bold on the penta.

That only happened because gfox split blams and saves off into their own categories. Providing I don't miss any, at pace my next 10k would be XP on 2 January, 2006. Posts will probably make it next though. Picking up the BP list again has vastly increased my posting habits.

At 10/22/04 10:33 PM, ramagi wrote: Well congratz to Qwoxyl and DOgma. If I missed anyone congratz to them.

Thanks much =) Any chance you make it to that "next stop" tonight?

At 10/22/04 11:17 PM, D0GMA wrote: Thanks much =)

no probs, you'd do the same for me, right? ... RIGHT???

Reviews > forum spam

damn right. reviews own.

Just make sure you take the time to write something constructive. Too many people are seeing their review count like a post count ... just more spam.

are you saying i should take my time to write helpful reviews or posts???
because if you're suggesting my reviews are spam, i must curse at you, call you obsenities, then catch a plane over to USA or wherever you live and beat the hell out of j00!!! XD

^^ busted

lol yeh i sure was.

That only happened because gfox split blams and saves off into their own categories. Providing I don't miss any, at pace my next 10k would be XP on 2 January, 2006. Posts will probably make it next though. Picking up the BP list again has vastly increased my posting habits.

hmm yes i've seen that in the past couple of days...
anyways, congrats on 2 different 10k stats.