At 6/11/04 07:12 AM, D0GMA wrote:
At 6/11/04 06:04 AM, MrX2003 wrote:
Do entries take a long time to pass judgement and you voted on them twice?
There were a few instances (3 or 4) where I got to vote twice on a flash and got points for both. I do know what happened with most of my "curbs" ... and that he fixed it this afternoon lol.
Did you vote again the minute the new day started? And you found some trick or error so you could get more 'curbs'?
I guess, but I wouldn't want to go there.
Wander tehir forums a bit. There's people spouting off left and right about "pwning NG" and other drivel of that ilk.
I'll go there tomorrow just to see which people think that.
That really does suck. I mean if even 5 people got angry with one of the artists over there
Good explaination
Didn't think about that, especially the alts. I'm so glad that on NG that one person can't make that much of a difference on scores (unless he had over 20 alts).
Presumably the author is (or was) allowed to vote on their flash, but recently I've seen entries park UJ with no votes, or just mine, for a half hour plus.
Half hour, wow. No one must know that they can/could have done that. Here you're lucky if you see an UJ entry without a vote for more than a minute.
At 6/11/04 02:49 AM, D0GMA wrote:
That would be a cool feature, but NG has so many users and only the top 50 blammers and savers are important here.
Does that mean I can stop updating?
I meant the top 50 blammers and the top 50 savers since we were talking about the feature of separate curb and keep ranks. So gfox should be asking that question, not you. Although I do like, I might even say need, your updates.
By the sound of that, flipsided obviously didn't have any information about ranks.
NG only recently got around to listing the ranks we have. Most of the info prior to that was gleaned from watching ramagi rank up lol
Oh. Well... I do want to see what the first rank is (when someone gets it, if it even exists yet), just to know how different it is from the NG ranks.
And on an related note, it appears the yellow in the posting box ran out.
Good long explaination
Ok, now I know. Thanks.
At 6/11/04 07:20 AM, FlGMENT wrote:
Info
I thought it was the same for everyone. Oh well, thanks.
Congrats on your first long post, even though most of it seemed to be quotes. ;)
More like looooooooong post, my second post at NG was quite long with no quotes (I don't think I knew what w/ meant at the time). Lots of typed text without too many paragraphs and it took forever to write it as well. Unlike my post in here which took maybe half an hour tops. And thanks for the congrats.
And how the hell was that a related note? Haha!
I meant unrelated (which is why 'an' is there).