At 3/17/11 01:46 AM, reverend wrote:At 3/16/11 05:23 PM, Auz wrote: Sounds like a good reason. Over here there are really only three fast food joints which are dominating the market. They are KFC, McDonalds and Burger King, so the KFC can actually sell something exclusive. Not that the other two don't have chicken burgers, but KFC's simply sells much better quality chicken.So you don't have a Tex-Mex place as well like Taco Bell?
Other than those three there is only the Subway as far as I know.
Nope. No Taco Bell, no Chipotle, no Wendy's... Starbucks' are very rare. That's about all the major fast food chains I know.
What we do have a lot of are 'snackbars', which mostly center around french fries and fried meat. About every city or village has one. As far as I know there are only two fairly big chains of them though and there are hundreds of singular snackbars around.
Subways are all over the place here as well.
The paper last week said that Subway now had more restaurants than McDonalds. But their profits were still much lower.
Brown gravy, okay, people do that. But milk and butter? Wtf? 0.oWhen you are making the mashed potatoes you add milk or cream to make it more creamy. You could just mash them but then they are just essentially boiled potatoes. The butter is to add some more flavor.
The milk isn't being added at the dinner table but while it's being made. :P
Hmmm well... I like eating them that way with apple sauce instead of milk and butter, so who am I to judge? Even for our countries' standards that's weird :p
I'm sure there are plenty here. But do you really mean that the 'main dish' is some kind of pork meat? Like ... anything else will just be a sidedish?Yeah. Like you have porkchops as the main focus of the meal while you can have sides like vegetables, salad, etc.
Hmm okay that sounds a bit weird to me, but perhaps it's a matter of definition. Personally what I call the 'main dish' is what I have the most of on my plate. That is never the meat, so I consider that a sidedish.
I don't know if you define the main and sidedish the same.
I agree. I guess there are some legal advantages, but I'm sure you can do fine without. Plus if you break up, it will be a lot of hassle to get things sorted out like you said. Especially if there are kids involved as well.I'm sure there are some tax credits one can take over here if you're married, and I know there are child tax credits as well but yeah it seem burdensome. I guess people in love do dumb things. :P
I have never really looked into that, so I have no idea what exacty the benefits are.
However, recently I have officially registered me and my gf as 'fiscal partners' which also came with some benefits. But they are really minimal, we get like a few euros extra now for health care and I think that's about it.
At 3/17/11 04:56 AM, Coop wrote:At 3/16/11 05:23 PM, Auz wrote: Lol. So they gave him a hand crossbow? Interesting :pHis specialist subject was projectile weapons, much like Doug Fackler was the slapstick specialist
Slapstick specialist? Always useful to have one of those on your team.
At 3/17/11 02:23 PM, Bahamut wrote:At 3/16/11 05:23 PM, Auz wrote: Well they're lucky to have such a caring owner. I'm hearing too many stories nowadays of people neglecting their pets and leaving them behind somewhere because they didn't really think about how much it would cost to take care of one.Humans are scum and careless.
Sadly, there is some truth in that :(
I thought rabbits normally don't like to be alone, but in that rabbits case I can imagine he's better off without another rabbit hopping around him. I guess there might also be the risk of them starting to fight?Our first rabbit didn't have a partner until she was 4. We didn't consider a partner at first up until we thought it'd be ideal if we had a second rabbit.
I think it's better for them, yes. I believe rabbits are social animals.
I'm sure many metal fans would drool over his metal LPs collection :pWell, LPs are becoming more and more popular these days. A fair amount of albums are easy to get on vinyl, although they do cost more than CDs.
Yeah, I know more and more people who suddenly start buying LPs and have an LP player at home. Personally I like LPs mostly for their huge cover art.
They could do the same in a Majora's Mask remake, if it ever comes. There's also a Lost Woods-like place there.There was? Man, it's been so long since I last played Majora's Mask.
Yeah, it was in the swamp near the magic potion shop. You had to follow some monkey to get through. OoT's Lost Woods was more interesting though. In MM the areas all look similar and there's nothing special anywhere as far as I know.
Although I prefer it over Ocarina of Time, I really want to give this game the quality plays rather than quantity plays.
I have to agree, although I can see why Ocarina of Time is considered the 'better game' generally. As for quality vs quantity plays... it's already too late for me. Majora's Mask is the game I did most runs through. I think the counter is on nine runs right now. But like you I haven't touched it in a long time, perhaps I should dig it back up soon and relive some childhood memories.
I agree. Final Fantasy VI deserves a 3D remake at the very least. It'd be awesome if they work out Kefka right (in 2D sprites there isn't really much room for expressions and poses).I'm talking about a whole new game relating to FFVI but that's also good.
Like I said, it's the least it deserves. But a prequel or sequel would be sweet of course. I don't see much room for a sequel though, but an interesting prequel should be makeable. It could aim on explaining more about Kefka. About his past and what turned him into that joker figure. IIRC the game never got into that.