Congratsss 2:
QwertyBoi: level 11
StarF68: level 11
Washu-Chan 5k exp
Bahamut-Chan: level 10 ( did you take the idea name from LW)
TheSoulMan 400th rank in b/p
EvanStone 1k saves
Crossofdevil: Praporshchik
dave 9,000 posts (we as in you and Bonus)
Onnet 5k rank for exp
Coop83 11,000 blams
MrCrazy 50k tpp
GobHoblin 3 ppd
verycoldguy 1k exp
Washu-Chan 7,777 saves
head2toewinner and SirSalt 100th post
ReconRebel 25,ooo saves
Bahamut7 2,040 exp and level 10???????????
killer-of-cows 6k tpp
XwaynecoltX 20,000 saves
badseed1: Saftey patrol
wesdood 250th ranked b/per
LordTrunks 6 ppd
blue-block 1k exp
Shadow-Angel: EG Major
Mrputter TOp 700th for b/ps
AllReligiousDrunk: Private
Congrats tommorow to:
Washu-Chan: level 13
PickledOnionMuffin: level 16
jonthomson: level 20
thanks to
Major-punk
At 9/23/06 12:20 AM, JerkClock wrote:
He's been missing every once in a while, but one of his misses happened this week. HumanTarget was behind him by 50, now he's behind by 40.
I dont know if he's been missing every once in a while, I havent paid attention to the top 50 changes in a long time.
At 9/23/06 05:18 AM, schneelocke wrote:
At 9/22/06 12:18 AM, SlashFirestorm wrote:
72, if we count Sevenstar.
But of course, we don't. :-P
No, we don't. Anyway, big congrats, and welcome to the club! ^_^
We should, I do because he made it to egsc, and it doesnt matter if he was deleted or either nerfed, he should still be counted as an egsc to determin what number you got when egsc is reached.
At 9/23/06 01:41 PM, Crossofdevil wrote:
Man i cant wait for and its taking forever!
AHHHH!!
forever yes how long is that.
At 9/23/06 01:48 PM, Crossofdevil wrote:
YAY I FINALLY
7 miutes wow that was a long time.
At 9/23/06 06:54 PM, Inuyasha wrote:
I killed my alts before they reached level 4, they could have been at 16, now I have one at level 12 going to 13 and nodeppsit vagrant. I am sadden I treated my alts like that.
Heh, it's alright I guess. I was wanting to use mine for gimmick threads but now thats going against the rules. I think I'll say fuck you to that rule though. :/
I guess too. I would still use it for a gimmick, I think a mod made that stupid new rule up. Anyways its for the mod to determine if it breaks the rule, becauses its under the second catergory of rules If you break these rules, you're definitely risking being banned.
At 9/23/06 05:53 AM, Bahamut wrote:
isCRULZ. No.
Then which one is.
At 9/24/06 12:20 AM, ramagi wrote:
Well I figured I had gotten all those by now, thanks though :)
You did, I was late but not that many days off, well good luck.
At 9/24/06 06:37 AM, XwaynecoltX wrote:
Saves, now matching 20k+ saves and blams and the gap between them is very close aswell...
gfoxclock would be proud of that.