800 reviews, yay

Yes, I did just have 700.

This may not be a "goal" but I do have:

SAVES: Assisted in the protection of 111 quality entries.

..Kinda cool...

Call me an asshole, but I attempt to blam almost everything. If it's exceptionally good, I don't vote.

I just happen to like the fact that I helped to kill off 378 (soon to be more) submissions, and yet I saved nothing. Is that bad?

At 7/29/06 12:41 PM, Rioan wrote:

:If it's exceptionally good, I don't vote.

Why not? That makes no sense. Acctually it is up to you what you do.

At 7/29/06 12:48 PM, --DarkRainbowStudios wrote:

At 7/29/06 12:41 PM, Rioan wrote: If it's exceptionally good, I don't vote.

Why not? That makes no sense. Acctually it is up to you what you do.

I know it's strange, but in a few years, racking up blams and gaining points and experience, I will be known as the guy who destroyed some 20,000 submissions, and saved z e r o. I don't know, I just like that I guess.

At 7/29/06 12:48 PM, --DarkRainbowStudios wrote:

At 7/29/06 12:41 PM, Rioan wrote: If it's exceptionally good, I don't vote.

Why not? That makes no sense. Acctually it is up to you what you do.

You know, I think you meant why I didn't vote for the good ones (my mistake).

Easy answer, why would I try to blam something I like, or something that I know won't get blammed because it's extremely good? I wouldn't want to hurt the jaw-droppingly good submissions because I want to appear evil (because then I really would be an asshole).

As to why I don't vote high for these good submissions, read my last post.

At 7/29/06 01:06 PM, Rioan wrote:

I know it's strange, but in a few years,

Sign-up Date:
07/23/2006

I'm not quite following...

At 7/29/06 01:10 PM, --DarkRainbowStudios wrote: I'm not quite following...

That's why, much later, obviously no time remotely near the present.
I think I hit my 4 in 30 minutes limit, so it'll take me a while to respond.

At 7/29/06 01:11 PM, Rioan wrote:

At 7/29/06 01:10 PM, --DarkRainbowStudios wrote: I'm not quite following...

That's why, much later, obviously no time remotely near the present.

You're making no sense...

I think I hit my 4 in 30 minutes limit, so it'll take me a while to respond.

I know a secret around that..

At 7/29/06 02:12 PM, -Vox wrote:

You're making no sense...

Making no sense is what I do best. I suppose one would have to know me to understand me.

I know a secret around that..

Do you now? Is it something you could get in trouble for?

At 7/29/06 01:06 PM, Rioan wrote: I know it's strange, but in a few years, racking up blams and gaining points and experience, I will be known as the guy who destroyed some 20,000 submissions, and saved z e r o. I don't know, I just like that I guess.

Not sure if that's a good idea.... I think the NG admins frown upon people blamming everything. But you should probably ask in the general forum about that, I suppose. :)

(Not to mention that when your vote is the one that saves a submission, you *will* get a save point, even if you voted 0 or 1, so you'll probably get at least a few saves anyway.)

I'm not sure if you can get in trouble for it. It's not a hack or anything...
Here's what you do.
When you get the error message saying "reached quota" or whatever.
go post in another forum. Example: If I get it in Clubs/ Crews
I post in General, once or twice, then maybye flash. then BAM over to Clubs and crews and i'm good.

At 7/29/06 02:25 PM, schneelocke wrote: Not sure if that's a good idea.... I think the NG admins frown upon people blamming everything. But you should probably ask in the general forum about that, I suppose. :)

But I don't try to blam everything, just what I think is 1.) Blammable and; 2.) Should be blammed.

(Not to mention that when your vote is the one that saves a submission, you *will* get a save point, even if you voted 0 or 1, so you'll probably get at least a few saves anyway.)

And exactly how does a vote of 0 save a submission? It hasn't so far.

At 7/29/06 02:28 PM, -Vox wrote: Here's what you do.

Well, I probably wouldn't go through the trouble, because I'm not that eager nor anxious to post.

Lifted bans on reviews and Audio portal.

2,000 posts

At 7/29/06 02:25 PM, schneelocke wrote: Not sure if that's a good idea.... I think the NG admins frown upon people blamming everything. But you should probably ask in the general forum about that, I suppose. :)

It's fine as long as you don't vote 0 on absolutely everything that's submitted.

(Not to mention that when your vote is the one that saves a submission, you *will* get a save point, even if you voted 0 or 1, so you'll probably get at least a few saves anyway.)

Nope. If you vote 0 or 1 and a submission gets protected, you won't get a protection point, whether you casted the 200th vote or not. The same goes for if you vote 2+ on a submission and you see the blam movie. You only get the points if you voted "correctly".

At 7/29/06 02:30 PM, Rioan wrote: And exactly how does a vote of 0 save a submission? It hasn't so far.

A submission needs a score of 1.60+ after 200 votes in order to pass. If you cast the 200th vote and the score is 1.60+, you'll see the saviour movie.

just got 590 saves :-)

And here's a picture too

(I waited for some posts to avoid triple-posts by me)

At 7/29/06 04:25 PM, Afro_Stud wrote:

At 7/29/06 02:25 PM, schneelocke wrote: Not sure if that's a good idea.... I think the NG admins frown upon people blamming everything. But you should probably ask in the general forum about that, I suppose. :)

It's fine as long as you don't vote 0 on absolutely everything that's submitted.

I think this comment was supposed to go to me, and no, I don't vote 0 on absolutely everything, just the things that I think need to be blammed.

What I had in question was whether or not it's okay to NOT attempt to protect good pieces of work. I think it's okay not to, because if they're good, one less vote isn't going to hurt, just slow it down (by one vote which is nothing). It only becomes a problem if everyone starts to think this way, which I doubt.

At 7/29/06 02:30 PM, Rioan wrote: And exactly how does a vote of 0 save a submission? It hasn't so far.

A submission needs a score of 1.60+ after 200 votes in order to pass. If you cast the 200th vote and the score is 1.60+, you'll see the saviour movie.

Okay, so I'll see the savior movie, it doesn't mean I saved it, and it doesn't grant me a protection point (as you stated earlier).

At 7/29/06 02:30 PM, Rioan wrote: And exactly how does a vote of 0 save a submission? It hasn't so far.

Easy. When your vote's the 200th, and when the total score at that time (including your 0) is above 1.60, the flash will be saved; you'll get the "oh saviour!" animation and a save point, even though you voted 0. (As far as I know, that is; maybe it was changed at some point...)

ok man i dont understand this how do i lvl up i am a complete noob to this stuff its nothing like the online script games i play someone please help me out

At 7/29/06 06:42 PM, don_raven wrote: how do i lvl up

You might want to take a look at the FAQ

To get experience points you have to vote on 5 submissions in a day, once you've done that you will be allowed to deposit your experience points and you will recieve 10 points for doing so.

Once you've signed up and created a profile, there are no other ways to get experience points, which means you can only get 10 points a day.

Once you get so many experience points you will go up a level, look at this to see all the levels and how many points you currently need to reach each level.

Also use this to see how long it will take you to reach a certain level. It works by assuming that the current level 30 user and you deposit each day.

For more information on Experience Points, read this.

Also look at the picture below to clearly see how to get experience points:

At 7/29/06 06:35 PM, schneelocke wrote: Easy. When your vote's the 200th, and when the total score at that time (including your 0) is above 1.60, the flash will be saved; you'll get the "oh saviour!" animation and a save point, even though you voted 0. (As far as I know, that is; maybe it was changed at some point...)

I have to type this again? Okay, but next time read it all.

Even if I'm the 200th voter, and it gets saved even with my 0, I won't get a protection point. I will see the movie that says I saved it, but I know the truth, and without the protection point, I didn't save anything, now did I?

yesssss

I finally got 900+ blams.

just 5 more to Private!!!

Private!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!

At 7/29/06 07:37 PM, homer8722 wrote: Private!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(: congradulations

woo it took a while (woulda dun it last week) but 666 posts dun!

At 7/29/06 08:25 PM, -_-Psycho-Simple-_- wrote: woo it took a while (woulda dun it last week) but 666 posts dun!

Way to go Satan.

Milestone reached!

A bad attitude is the only true disability in life, they just don't hand out those spiffy handicapped licence plates for it.

Just hit 600 saves and gained a .11 increase to my voting power.