RCVL should stay, IMO. We've lost enough lists as it is.
At 4/27/05 04:16 AM, -DaughterOfHades- wrote:
At 4/26/05 08:33 PM, Denvish wrote:
At 4/26/05 04:04 PM, liljim wrote:
I never heard anything back.
Hmmmm. It wasn't the liveliest of emails, but there was some feedback from most parties. gfox has presumably got all the comments compiled somewhere, I don't really understand why he hasn't forwarded them on to you.
Maybe we all should get on Greg's ass about that?
I already e-mailed liljim on Tuesday when I happened to notice his post in here while doing a tiny bit of lurking.
The reason I hadn't e-mailed him before then was because we never seemed to come to a consensus about what the wishlist should contain. If you guys don't recall, in my last e-mail to you all, I asked certain people for certain contributions (For instance, I asked RedCircle and/or Dogma to summarise their desires with regards to the Portal Submissions Stats area of our wishlist), but I never heard back from any of you. Not a single reply from anyone. Not to mention I never heard from SK in response to any of my three or four "huge multi-quote reply" e-mails on the matter... in short, the entire roundtable thing didn't seem to be going very well, and I got busy/distracted, so I didn't try to restart it when no one ever replied. I apologise for not relaying everyone's opinions to liljim ASAP if that's what you were expecting me to do, but I had wanted us to REALLY get some collective work done on making a tight, terse, to-the-point wishlist... and since we never did, I didn't report to liljim.
But anyway, the past is the past. I sent liljim a list of possible actions I can do in that mail on Tuesday, and I'll do whichever he asks (restart the dialogues, forward him all 12 e-mails in the discussion, or come up with some sort of digest/summary of our discussions up till April 8th when all conversation suddenly stopped for whatever reason).
At 4/27/05 05:34 AM, Denvish wrote:
At 4/27/05 04:23 AM, Uberbarista wrote:
Secondly, posting in the forums, in any of them, is not a prerequisite for using them. I don't have to post in here every single time I read a thread, or for that matter, any other part of the site. Thirdly, I have have seen rude comments to new users here, regardless of how many times a question has been asked.
Well, I've very rarely seen rude comments from Wi/Ht regulars (SK being the obvious exception, but his comments are usually not directed at thread starters, more at people who re-answer a question that's already been answered - ie, idiots who don't bother reading the whole thread). Maybe I'm being selectively blind, but most new threads asking questions are answered quickly and amicably; despite the fact that the person asking could often have found the answer themself by reading the NG Help. In the rare cases where a thread starter is abused, the flaming is generally carried out by people who I wouldn't consider to be Wi/Ht regulars or the topic itself is intended as spam.
You forgot the times when a newbie asks a basic question he could have (and should have) found the answer to on his own, and when he didn't get an answer in less than 5 minutes, he bumps his thread and says something like "WHAT IS GOING ON? ANSWER ME, DAMNIT!"... and then 5 minutes later he posts a SIMILAR post again, so by that point there are three posts by him in his topic and nothing else... and then someone (usually TheJoe324) comes along and says he would have helped him, but the guy's acting like a jackass. Then he locks the topic.
So anyway... yeah. That's another reason a topic starter gets abused on Wi/Ht?, but it's nothing compared to the treatment he'd receive on General, so I don't think it's such a bad thing.
The only other thing that I can think you might be referring to is users who try too hard to become Wi/Ht regulars - there's no denying that Wi/Ht is quite cliquey - but these users are generally treated with tolerance and respect, unless they blatantly spam to get their name known and thus made a Regular/Member.
There's nothing exclusionary about Wi/Ht?, though, since we don't prevent anyone from posting in any topics. So I don't see any reason for anyone to complain unless they're a club-whore who's pissed off they can't get into the Wi/Ht? membership just by asking a couple times and being on the forum for two days.
All in all, I still don't understand where you're coming from with your "most people don't come here, because they don't exactly get a friendly welcome from the regulars here, from what I have seen." comment.... but, it's not really important in the grand scheme of things, so now I'm going to stop getting my knickers in a twist.
Wi/Ht? is quiet, bucolic, low-traffic, and friendly compared to most of NG BBS. I don't understand where he was coming from either. Maybe people are intimidated by the stat list topics.