00:00
00:00
Newgrounds Background Image Theme

FrozenAltars just joined the crew!

We need you on the team, too.

Support Newgrounds and get tons of perks for just $2.99!

Create a Free Account and then..

Become a Supporter!

Lowering to 5.0016?

3,096 Views | 37 Replies

Response to Lowering to 5.0016? 2005-03-04 22:06:18


At 3/4/05 09:27 PM, Doomsday_Specter wrote:
At 3/4/05 09:02 PM, AnzRage wrote: that is impossible because the max is 5.00, i'm guessing you just photoshoped that image to get attention.
so says a person with over 1000 posts to someone with less than 10...

To someone who has far less points, but much more exp...

Response to Lowering to 5.0016? 2005-03-04 22:08:44


At 3/4/05 10:06 PM, Dizfunktion wrote: What submission got a clear 5!?

It was probably just in the early stages of submission so only acouple peopled voted 5, and i guess one person voted 6.

Response to Lowering to 5.0016? 2005-03-04 22:09:20


At 3/4/05 10:06 PM, Dizfunktion wrote: What submission got a clear 5!?

its probably photoshopped, or a bug in the system, the flash with the highest score is Bunnykill 2, with 4.36

Response to Lowering to 5.0016? 2005-03-04 22:11:03


ATTENTION:
Its note fake, ive gotten the error several times.


... LOL WOW this signature is ancient.

BBS Signature

Response to Lowering to 5.0016? 2005-03-04 22:11:37


At 3/4/05 10:08 PM, stick0 wrote:
At 3/4/05 10:06 PM, Dizfunktion wrote: What submission got a clear 5!?
It was probably just in the early stages of submission so only acouple peopled voted 5, and i guess one person voted 6.

Of course. Someone voted and got the daily double. It's a shame they only wagered 3 points, though.

They coulda beat Ken Jennings if they'd wagered 5. >:-[


So often times it happens, that we live our lives in chains, and we never even know we had the key...

BBS Signature

Response to Lowering to 5.0016? 2005-03-04 22:11:54


If that isn't fake(which I think it is), it was probably just a chain of losers voting 5 until it rose that high. What was it that had that anyway?I mean, if it's not fake, tell us already!

Response to Lowering to 5.0016? 2005-03-04 22:12:55


Proof;

Lowering to 5.0016?


... LOL WOW this signature is ancient.

BBS Signature

Response to Lowering to 5.0016? 2005-03-04 22:28:21


At 3/4/05 10:06 PM, -Tharikifa- wrote:
At 3/4/05 09:27 PM, Doomsday_Specter wrote: so says a person with over 1000 posts to someone with less than 10...
To someone who has far less points, but much more exp...

XP is more or less meaningless - it's only a measure of how long you've been signed up (as long as you vote on five entries a day to be able to deposit, which doesn't take any actual effort).

At 3/4/05 10:08 PM, stick0 wrote:
At 3/4/05 10:06 PM, Dizfunktion wrote: What submission got a clear 5!?
It was probably just in the early stages of submission so only acouple peopled voted 5, and i guess one person voted 6.

Yes, this was quite early - about two minutes after the movie had been submitted. However, that's just the question. How can anyone vote 6 on a movie? That should be impossible.

At 3/4/05 10:11 PM, Falloople wrote: If that isn't fake(which I think it is), it was probably just a chain of losers voting 5 until it rose that high. What was it that had that anyway?I mean, if it's not fake, tell us already!

a) it's not a fake.
b) basic math: you can't get a score higher than five without a vote that's higher than five - which should be impossible.
c) As I said earlier in the thread, it was ZekeySpaceLizard's Runawayhand.

At 3/4/05 10:12 PM, DarkArchon wrote: Proof;

Thanks. I got that myself in the past, too, but I always attributed it to a glitch in the system that would tell you you "lowered" an entry's score to this or that when you were the first person to vote on it, no matter what score you gave it. Given today's experience, I'm not so sure about that anymore.


Það er margt sem myrkrið veit / minn er hugur þungur

Oft ég svarta sandinn leit / svíða grænan engireit

Í jöklinum hljóða dauðadjúpar sprungur