At 2/28/25 09:07 PM, FriKinky wrote:[...] You can get shocking images in Discord servers and Twitter or whatever too, you have no way to avoid it [...]
Regardless of my own stance on the matter, "other places are bad at stuff" might be a point of data that provides context, but makes for a poor argument in a discussion.
Several big hosters of adult entertainment videos have an age check that boils down to "You're old enough for this stuff? Click Yes or No?" that a person can bypass without even being able to read and write (or operate a keyboard).
Hell, even SubscribeStar fills in a "legal" date immediately after you click on the field to confirm your age...
"Certain sites" have been lackluster in their age determining methods for decades, just so potential customers would like their site better - and now all of those sites have to pay the price. I like looking at smut on the internet, but honestly: Not only did they do it to themselves, they had it coming...
[...] what happened to not letting young kids alone on the Internet?
While I am of the opinion that the various sites share part of the blame, I agree that the current situation is predominantly the parents' fault. From my understanding it is tempting to just offload entertaining/distracting their offspring when they are already overstressed from work, chores, various things they need to take care of because they have a kid, and they are desperately craving some peace and quiet - or a social life...
"What is the worst that can happen...?" D:
But then it happens. And if the parents are shit people, they will then try to deflect the responsibility for their own actions onto somebody else. And why not the government? Other people will instantly agree that the government is to blame for a ton of stuff that is wrong in the world. Those parents do not want "a solution" - they just don't want to be "at fault".
"My 3 year old son injected himself with my insulin and got really sick. I'm suing the company that made the syringe for making it so easy for children do use..."
Does this sound outlandish to you? "Child safety locks."
Programs such as Net Nanny (not sponsored) have been around for almost as long as the internet was accessible by the public. (For reference: Where I live, even having a computer in your household was a rarity in 1994. Somebody noticed a problem there long before it became widespread...)
But that doesn't mean a thing if legal guardians never purchase a license and install the damn thing! Those parents have some growing up to do themselves before they are "ready" to take care of children of their own. But evidently that doesn't happen and we morally cannot take away peoples' reproductive rights. Because that would be absolutely monstrous! (compare the last statement to page 7, if you will...)