rate my sig. also rate a sig i made that i posted in page 1.
words

rate my sig. also rate a sig i made that i posted in page 1.
words
At 5/2/04 10:31 PM, Baldy17 wrote:At 5/2/04 08:36 PM, nevergetcaughtalive wrote: WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!!! those are great sigs and just because the screen name doesn't bind the creator to what the screen name says (IE D-DUNK = a guy dunking) doesn't mean they're generic... SOME of them are kinda plain, but You seriously need to get a clue or learn to shut up D-Dunk.lol, Whoa! I didn't expect to start a fight. But yeah, thank you also. What do you think I could do to improve them?
well, you could add different colors, one color for the whole thing is kinda too generic try mixing a few different colors in other than that they are great
Ok, ok, just tell me how the one is i am using now, or should it be this one, it's inspired by coldplay with the song clocks. Hmm, just tell me, wich one is better. So here's the new one...Gimme a rating.
At 5/3/04 03:38 PM, sneepioo wrote: Ok, ok, just tell me how the one is i am using now, or should it be this one, it's inspired by coldplay with the song clocks. Hmm, just tell me, wich one is better. So here's the new one...Gimme a rating.
i like the one in use now i give th enew one a 8 it is very cool but i like the wolf it stands out mor the color scheme is also better
:plz people join i need members
it is hard to keep rating because i can only post 4x per 30 min
At 5/3/04 05:47 PM, D-Dunk wrote:plz people join i need membersit is hard to keep rating because i can only post 4x per 30 min
Which is why you rate more than one sig at a time. =/
At 5/3/04 05:51 PM, Freemind wrote: Rate mine!
i like the matrix even though it is way overused the people are cool i give it a 8.5 great!!!!
At 5/3/04 05:51 PM, Freemind wrote: Rate mine!
10!!!!!
Haha, I made that sig.
Rate mine! :o)
At 5/3/04 07:16 PM, Bertuzzi44 wrote:At 5/3/04 05:51 PM, Freemind wrote: Rate mine!10!!!!!
Haha, I made that sig.
Rate mine! :o)
9 the name is perfect size with a snazzy lighting backround
At 5/3/04 07:19 PM, D-Dunk wrote: 9 the name is perfect size with a snazzy lighting backround
Thanks :o)
Yours gets a 10. Alucard rocks.
At 5/3/04 07:20 PM, UltimateZeldaFan wrote: yo rate mine
i love the pics (link) and zelda the game but the scanlines really ruined the sig if you get rid of them then its a 10
Hey, I made a new sig, with gambit and cyclops can someone rate mine? and -Axe- is it an immporvment from my last one?
Thanks to Ninjar for the sig. -NGSM
*****You guys need to remember to actually post the sig that you want rated, so if we are to come back to them later, we will know what we were referring to when the sig was criticized.*****
At 5/3/04 10:18 AM, sneepioo wrote: Oh, buddies, let's not die out. Look at my new one, what's cha all thinking? I think this is a cool one. hmm, axe, gimme your opinion, always helpfull.
I actually like this one a lot better than that last one you had. The text is a bit choppy looking, but you can hardly tell so that is fine. I like the theme of it too, for some reason it just fits with you a lot more than the other one. The wolf and wing pictures really stand out of the pic, I'm not sure if you meant for that or not. Just depends what you were going for. You should try lowering the Opacity of the pics a bit, so that they don't jump out at you.
At 5/3/04 10:19 AM, Joic wrote: Oooh rate my sigie!
Well, I would....but you didn't really make it. So I don't know why I would say much about it. I do like it though...cheers to Tkum for the good art.
At 5/3/04 11:46 AM, Demonolith wrote: rate my sig. also rate a sig i made that i posted in page 1.
It almost looks like you only used a single picture to make that sig, but if not, then you did some really good blending work. The text is cool, and you chose a good color for that. The flare on the M is a good touch. And the border is original, I have never seen that done before.
At 5/3/04 03:38 PM, sneepioo wrote: Ok, ok, just tell me how the one is i am using now, or should it be this one, it's inspired by coldplay with the song clocks. Hmm, just tell me, wich one is better. So here's the new one...Gimme a rating.
That one is pretty damn good. I love the background, that is really cool. And you chose an excellent color for the text, because it just blends right in well. The clock that you posted into the pic is a bit obvious, you should try and blur the edges a bit or smooth them over so that you can't tell, as you can see the white around the black edge. And the numbers on the clock are a bit faded, a better pic would be a plus.
At 5/3/04 05:51 PM, Freemind wrote: Rate mine!
Considering this one was done by a friend of mine, I will point out some things so that maybe he will be able to come and look at them. Everything about this is pretty cool, just a few things that stand out. The pic of Keanu on the right is a bit to bright, and could use a bit of Lighting Effects done to it. The matrix background is pretty cool, but the glow on the lines on the far right are a bit bright, and could also use some Lighting Effects to tone them down.
At 5/3/04 07:16 PM, Bertuzzi44 wrote: 10!!!!!
Haha, I made that sig.
Rate mine! :o)
Your sig that you are currently using has some great effects on it, I have to admit that. I like how you blended your name into the background on the top right and the lower left. And the effects just flow well. I can't really tell, but it looks like you have a vertical grain blended into the background, which adds to the visual neatness of the sig. Your actual name could be a bit bigger, but too much bigger would block out some of the background too much.
At 5/3/04 07:20 PM, UltimateZeldaFan wrote: yo rate mine
It looks alright, except the scanlines in it really need to be toned down. They really ruin the sig, as they distort the images quite a bit. If you tone them down, it would be easier to rate it. Until next time....
At 5/3/04 09:12 PM, ref wrote: Hey, I made a new sig, with gambit and cyclops can someone rate mine? and -Axe- is it an immporvment from my last one?
I'm actually not quite sure, because the last one wasn't posted. Which is why it would be a lot easier for you guys to post the sig that you want rated, so we can go back and take a look at them. So far that I can remember, this is an improvement from the last one. The pics could be of better quality, though. The text is nice, I'm not sure if it would look better with a smaller stroke on it or not. The backgrounds look pretty nice, I especially like that light trail on Gambit's. that thing int the middle, you should take that out. I'm not even sure what that is. Something else in the middle to help blend the two backgrounds into each other would be better.
At 5/3/04 09:17 PM, Foxphere wrote: Rate mine...its brand new and quite sexxay
The picture isn't very good quality, and the cut job on it wasn't very well done. The edges could stand to be blended with the background a bit better as well, because you can see bits of lighter color straggling along the pics borders. The background is pretty neat, and the barcode goes well with the sig. But the text doesn't stand out very well, something should be done about that.
Fine, might as well tkae this topic for critisism.
Rate my current one... and this one, just for kicks.
Oh. Your. God.
At 5/4/04 03:02 AM, Mr-Silv3r wrote: Fine, might as well tkae this topic for critisism.
Rate my current one... and this one, just for kicks.
Alright, why not. Even though you are better than I am, haha.
The one that you posted has some cool effects done to it. I like how the pictures blend into the background so well, and the animation in the top right is a cool addition. I don't think that the sig would be as good without that, it really adds a lot for some reason. All of the lines in that one are great too. The only bad thing about it is lack of brightness, it's a bit dark. And the text is a bit hard to read. But a very good sig.
The one that you are currently sporting is just excellent. I love that sig. The overlay, it looks like that, I am not sure, looks really good on top of the picture of the guy. The background is very well done, if you made that yourself. The bevel style on the text is great, and the 1px stroke on it (looks like it, not sure) adds to that at the far right of the text. And the border around it is very good as well. Basically, it's almost a perfect sig if you ask me. I don't think that there is much you could do to make that one look better.
At 5/4/04 03:10 AM, -Axe- wrote: I don't think that there is much you could do to make that one look better.
And that makes me one happy chappy.
Oh. Your. God.
This is soooo my purpose in life. OMG OMG rate my sig!
At 5/4/04 03:34 AM, Mr-Silv3r wrote:At 5/4/04 03:10 AM, -Axe- wrote: I don't think that there is much you could do to make that one look better.And that makes me one happy chappy.
Heh, your welcome...but I was only stating the truth. Of course, there are probably always things that you could do to make something look better, but that is just being picky about things.
At 5/4/04 03:42 AM, TsarMatt wrote: This is soooo my purpose in life. OMG OMG rate my sig!
I would, but I think that I already did that for you over on Retrogade when you posted up the link.
Hmm, i am trying to join the SSM...Axe, are these sigs good enough for that? Check them
here
At 5/4/04 02:36 AM, -Axe- wrote:
At 5/3/04 11:46 AM, Demonolith wrote: rate my sig. also rate a sig i made that i posted in page 1.It almost looks like you only used a single picture to make that sig, but if not, then you did some really good blending work. The text is cool, and you chose a good color for that. The flare on the M is a good touch. And the border is original, I have never seen that done before.
well thanks, and i didn't use one pic for that.
btw, i wanted ppl to rate this sig:
words
At 5/3/04 07:30 PM, D-Dunk wrote:At 5/3/04 07:20 PM, UltimateZeldaFan wrote: yo rate minei love the pics (link) and zelda the game but the scanlines really ruined the sig if you get rid of them then its a 10
I think the scanlines cive it something special and I like em alot...hey guess I could join...
Yeah, a special extremely generic look. Slapping thick black scanlines onto your sigs without any sort of blur or opacity fade is blatant abuse of scanlines. >:(
At 5/4/04 10:59 AM, Joic wrote:At 5/3/04 07:30 PM, D-Dunk wrote:I think the scanlines cive it something special and I like em alot...hey guess I could join...At 5/3/04 07:20 PM, UltimateZeldaFan wrote: yo rate minei love the pics (link) and zelda the game but the scanlines really ruined the sig if you get rid of them then its a 10
thx for joining!!!!!!!!!!!
At 5/3/04 07:20 PM, Bertuzzi44 wrote:At 5/3/04 07:19 PM, D-Dunk wrote: 9 the name is perfect size with a snazzy lighting backroundThanks :o)
Yours gets a 10. Alucard rocks.
u wanna join
thanx for the rating
the ssm made mine theyre the best!
I just can't make up my mind. Please, which of my sigs should i take?
One of the sigs here
Wich one?
At 5/4/04 03:52 PM, sneepioo wrote: I just can't make up my mind. Please, which of my sigs should i take?
One of the sigs here
Wich one?
the Ying Yang one looks good but so does the one with the wolf and the mountain background.
At 5/5/04 09:02 AM, Joic wrote:At 5/4/04 03:52 PM, sneepioo wrote: I just can't make up my mind. Please, which of my sigs should i take?the Ying Yang one looks good but so does the one with the wolf and the mountain background.
One of the sigs here
Wich one?
Hmm, i know... But how's this one?