At 5/2/04 02:09 PM, D-Dunk wrote:

At 5/2/04 11:20 AM, Guerilla-Unit wrote:

At 5/2/04 09:41 AM, D-Dunk wrote: Ill rate peoples sigs

Rate mine too!!!

9 the solgier is sick its like from the tom clancy game rainbow 6

Thanks man, and to isthatlegal for the awesome sig ....... you're the best ...

At 5/2/04 02:21 PM, kristof88 wrote: Isn't anyone gonna rate mine?

Sorry if i'm impatient...

its pretty cool the angle for the guy is great as the graphics 9

At 5/2/04 11:58 AM, TrevilTheFrogSnacher wrote: i think that this should be in the general forum, but who cares.
Rate mine!

funny as hell bad drawings but who cares 10

At 5/2/04 12:26 PM, ref wrote: Hey, can someone rate mine?

its cool with venom in the side lurking the graaph is really unique 8.5

At 5/2/04 02:23 PM, MaIadroit wrote: Should you be in any position to be rating sigs if you can't make them yourself?
I dunno man.. you just seem to be tossing random numbers out there.. you don't even really back up why you gave the score.

This sounds neat, I am here to rate everyone's sigs for them and tell why, not just give you a score. Kind of like Maladroit just said, you need someone who can clarify why you got the score you did.

At 5/2/04 11:09 AM, LC-hitman wrote: rate mine

I would give yours a 6.5 since it is pretty good and all. The scanlines kind of take away from the pic a bit, and they are widely overused now. The barcode isn't anything special, but still looks cool with the sig.

At 5/2/04 11:20 AM, Guerilla-Unit wrote: Rate mine too!!!

I really like your sig, I would give it an 8.0 no problem. The pictures flow well with each other, especially the soldier faded into the background going from most transparent on the right to least transparent on the left.

At 5/2/04 11:53 AM, kristof88 wrote: Rate mine.

Yours is original, I will give you that. Probably a 6.5 as well. I like the picture blending of it, and the style of the sig is nice. Again, the scanlines kind of take away. People should make them less visible to enhance the pic.

At 5/2/04 11:58 AM, TrevilTheFrogSnacher wrote: i think that this should be in the general forum, but who cares.
Rate mine!

I truthfully think that yours deserves a 0 because it's not funny and just wrong.

At 5/2/04 12:13 PM, Aasha wrote: Is mine okay? Had it for a while now.

I really like the effects in yours, so I would probably give it a 8.5 due to who made it and how well it was put together. The sphere grid in the background does well for the pic, and the colors all blend nicely together.

At 5/2/04 12:26 PM, ref wrote: Hey, can someone rate mine?

Yours would probably be a 4.0 in my eyes. The effects used in it were good, but just not put together very well. The faded pic of Scorpion on the far left should be a bit more transparent, and the pic of Venom on the right is a bit distorte. The grid is nice looking, but where the two colored backgrounds meet there should be better blending, and some better effects on the text. Nice work on that one, but could use practice.

At 5/2/04 01:34 PM, sneepioo wrote: K, some1 rate my sig please. I love this club, i will check it out often

Yours has good effects on the background, but you can't really tell that much.the sprite is a good one, although small and kind of distorted. the glow on the text is a bit big and everything, so it could use some work. I give it a 5.5 score.

At 5/2/04 03:03 PM, -Axe- wrote:

At 5/2/04 11:53 AM, kristof88 wrote: Rate mine.

Yours is original, I will give you that. Probably a 6.5 as well. I like the picture blending of it, and the style of the sig is nice. Again, the scanlines kind of take away. People should make them less visible to enhance the pic.

How about this? I've made the scanlines a bit less visible. Can you also tell me what you think of this sig, it's not so good in my opinion, but what the hell.

At 5/2/04 03:03 PM, -Axe- wrote:

At 5/2/04 02:23 PM, MaIadroit wrote: Should you be in any position to be rating sigs if you can't make them yourself?
I dunno man.. you just seem to be tossing random numbers out there.. you don't even really back up why you gave the score.

This sounds neat, I am here to rate everyone's sigs for them and tell why, not just give you a score. Kind of like Maladroit just said, you need someone who can clarify why you got the score you did.

that's right make way for the professional. and true very true i suggest you make your own sigs before you judge other peoples.

At 5/2/04 02:41 PM, D-Dunk wrote:

At 5/2/04 01:34 PM, sneepioo wrote:

So, this one, or the one i am using now?

the new one

Ok, i'll use that one, thanks for the advise.

At 5/2/04 03:03 PM, -Axe- wrote:

At 5/2/04 01:34 PM, sneepioo wrote: K, some1 rate my sig please. I love this club, i will check it out often

Yours has good effects on the background, but you can't really tell that much.the sprite is a good one, although small and kind of distorted. the glow on the text is a bit big and everything, so it could use some work. I give it a 5.5 score.

thanks for the comment axe, i know your the best from newgrounds with graphics and such (i am not kidding).
Ok, axe, what do you think about my new one?

don't forget mine!! squit yer eyes and you might notice it.. lol

At 5/2/04 03:03 PM, -Axe- wrote: detailed reviews

Axe, why don't you do this every now and then in ASM? It would be better than posting a sig twice, and it would help us (ASM) out a lot. I've made a good handful of sigs, and a lot of them are just missing something that I can't put my finger on. I, for one, could stand to learn a bit from you :)

Now as for this thread... People should be posting their sig in the body of their message. When people go back here a couple weeks from now and see different sigs, the ratings aren't going to match the sig being shown.

ya, this topic should really just be in the asm forums

At 5/2/04 03:52 PM, kristof88 wrote: How about this? I've made the scanlines a bit less visible. Can you also tell me what you think of this sig, it's not so good in my opinion, but what the hell.

Actually, I can't even see the scanlines in this one. Haha..I think that you made them a bit too transparent. I usually stick between 10-20 percent transparency, maybe down to 7 if need be. What you should do on this one is try and blur the edges on the brown pic in the middle of the other two so that it doesn't look like a cut and paste type deal. And the text looks a bit choppy. If you fixed those things, this would be a good sig. I like it.

At 5/2/04 04:18 PM, sneepioo wrote: thanks for the comment axe, i know your the best from newgrounds with graphics and such (i am not kidding).
Ok, axe, what do you think about my new one?

It's not too bad, you picked a cool character for it. Ironman is a badass. I don't understand the eagle to the right though, it doesn't fit very well. The text effects are cool, although it looks like you used a "precise" glow instead of a "softer" one. Try making it a soft glow, and make it a bit more transparent. Another thing you could try with the background, is use a Gradient Fill and set the mode to difference, and then use it 10 or so times. You can get some cool effects doing that. Be sure to set your colors by pressing "D" before though. Then when you get a cool looking background, press Ctr-U and play with the colors.

At 5/2/04 04:39 PM, -noir- wrote: don't forget mine!! squit yer eyes and you might notice it.. lol

Yours is cool looking, although you only used a single pic for the background and almost no effects. The faded bar looks cool, but the text is a bit hard to read for some reason.

At 5/2/04 04:47 PM, pieoncar wrote: Axe, why don't you do this every now and then in ASM? It would be better than posting a sig twice, and it would help us (ASM) out a lot. I've made a good handful of sigs, and a lot of them are just missing something that I can't put my finger on. I, for one, could stand to learn a bit from you :)

Heh, that's actually a good idea. I never thought about doing that before. The problem is, I am not the best sig maker ever. Maladroit is the best that I have ever seen, he's my role model. Along with a few others that keep giving me inspiration. I actually like your current sig, it's nice. The gold text effect is really cool, and the substituted clock for the O is a cool addition. The background is nice looking too, but the car pic is the only thing that throws it off, because it is kind of blurry.

woops.. i mean the new sig i have now>>>>>

At 5/2/04 04:47 PM, pieoncar wrote:

At 5/2/04 03:03 PM, -Axe- wrote: detailed reviews

Now as for this thread... People should be posting their sig in the body of their message. When people go back here a couple weeks from now and see different sigs, the ratings aren't going to match the sig being shown.

good idea

everyone who wants to join poste here and quote this!

Wow.. doesn't sound like you put much thought into this crew, huh? Just improv-ing it as you go along...

-Axe- does a much better job than you.. and it's not even his crew.

At 5/2/04 07:51 PM, MaIadroit wrote: Wow.. doesn't sound like you put much thought into this crew, huh? Just improv-ing it as you go along...

-Axe- does a much better job than you.. and it's not even his crew.

it was done sort of on the fly, because i thought it would be cool

Hey, could you guys tell me how I'm doing with the sigs that I've made, There's a link in my signature to a webpage that i use to showcase them. Thanks in advance.

At 5/2/04 08:07 PM, Baldy17 wrote: Hey, could you guys tell me how I'm doing with the sigs that I've made, There's a link in my signature to a webpage that i use to showcase them. Thanks in advance.

they're very good, but too generic

At 5/2/04 08:17 PM, D-Dunk wrote:

At 5/2/04 08:07 PM, Baldy17 wrote: Hey, could you guys tell me how I'm doing with the sigs that I've made, There's a link in my signature to a webpage that i use to showcase them. Thanks in advance.

they're very good, but too generic

WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!!! those are great sigs and just because the screen name doesn't bind the creator to what the screen name says (IE D-DUNK = a guy dunking) doesn't mean they're generic... SOME of them are kinda plain, but You seriously need to get a clue or learn to shut up D-Dunk.

At 5/2/04 08:17 PM, D-Dunk wrote: they're very good, but too generic

Thanks, but what do you mean by generic? There's always room to improve I guess.

At 5/2/04 08:36 PM, nevergetcaughtalive wrote: WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!!! those are great sigs and just because the screen name doesn't bind the creator to what the screen name says (IE D-DUNK = a guy dunking) doesn't mean they're generic... SOME of them are kinda plain, but You seriously need to get a clue or learn to shut up D-Dunk.

lol, Whoa! I didn't expect to start a fight. But yeah, thank you also. What do you think I could do to improve them?

what do you think of mine?

At 5/2/04 10:50 PM, cheeselord wrote: what do you think of mine?

You need to read up a few posts. You have to post your sig with your post so that when you guys change your sigs later on, they will still corresond with the posts that people make about them.

What do you guys think about this one? Criticism on what to change is welcome.

Hey this club could work is it still a club anyways here is my current sig made by -AXE- himself but i love it and will use it for along time...

~X~

At 5/2/04 08:17 PM, D-Dunk wrote:

they're very good, but too generic

WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!!! those are great sigs and just because the screen name doesn't bind the creator to what the screen name says (IE D-DUNK = a guy dunking) doesn't mean they're generic... SOME of them are kinda plain, but You seriously need to get a clue or learn to shut up D-Dunk.

Hey, stay calm please. But D-Dunk, don't get too much on your own opinion, understand that ppl will like it, different tastes, you know.
And yes, -Axe- is indeed doing a good job here.

Yes and Axe, this sig doesn't fits with my aura, don't you think so?

At 5/2/04 11:03 PM, -Axe- wrote: What do you guys think about this one? Criticism on what to change is welcome.

I like it, more than the one you use now, maybe you think it doesn't fits with your aura (damn aura's) And this is a sig without ssm, asm, ppm in it, well, that's ok with me. Hmm, what if you changed the sig colors to green so it fits with your aura?

Oh, buddies, let's not die out. Look at my new one, what's cha all thinking? I think this is a cool one. hmm, axe, gimme your opinion, always helpfull.

Oooh rate my sigie!

At 5/3/04 10:19 AM, Joic wrote: Oooh rate my sigie!

smooth, finally someone who knows what pentacle is evil, and what's not evil (you have the evil one) cool, maybe axe will give you a constructive critism, i am not good at that ;) i would say: 8

At 5/3/04 10:59 AM, sneepioo wrote:

At 5/3/04 10:19 AM, Joic wrote: Oooh rate my sigie!

smooth, finally someone who knows what pentacle is evil, and what's not evil (you have the evil one) cool, maybe axe will give you a constructive critism, i am not good at that ;) i would say: 8

ya damn right that I know what evil is...and one more thing...w00t I got an 8