At 11/30/09 05:14 PM, Haggard wrote: But what if the next week is loaded with audio requests as well. Wouldn't it be better to have something like a queue for requests per user? So, a user requests 3 audio reviews, but only one makes the list in week 1, the second requests is added to the list in week 2 and the third is added in week 3.
Good idea. We'll do that then :).
Of course, this would mean extra work for the one who does the request lists.
Just a little :P. It's pretty simple. If he sees a username repeatead twice or three times in the list, he just shifts the other 1 or 2 requests in the extra audio requests section. For example, someone requests three submissions on Week 1. Week 1 will have one of his submissions and the other 2 in the extra. Then, Week 2 will have his second request in the audio section, and in the extras there would be his third request. Then finally in Week 3 he gets his last submission reviewed. In other words, always look back in the last requests list to add the extra audio requests, and if in those extra audio requests, 2 of them was requested by the same user, one of those go in that current requests list. (Whoever understood a word from those sentences must be a genius...)
We are all statwhores (or, most of us ^^)
I agree 100% ^^.
and responses is one of the nicest stats.
Yeah.
Plus it helps the reviewer to get better. Some authors review the review, which is a nice way to help the reviewer improve his reviews. ^^
(wow, I never used the word "review" so often in a sentence. -.-)
Hehe, lol XD.
Hey, some users do that... :P- Do NOT request reviews for the same submission more than once.Duh :P.
No wai XD.
Well, it was some sort of unwritten rule in the old club as well. Because we value quality over quantity we rather have only a few members who write long and helpful reviews instead of a whole bunch of reviewers who only write one liners.
Yep, this is a review request club not a comment request club :D.
The points are a nice addition, it gives you that little extra motivation to do all the reviews. Also, in the old club some users did keep track of their own scores. But I trust the ones who update the lists. XD
You won't start trusting me once you see my first update :P. Lol, joking... I've been working at least 4-5 hours on it, since I had to get the spreadsheets ready, and do the update for 3 weeks combined. It does take a while... My respect for Sonofkirk has now trebled ^^.
Yeah, that was a rule introduced by milinko, even before I first joined the club. I guess there where some people who said "I join", but then never did any reviews.
I know what you mean. I don't see why people post to say 'Can I join?' and a member goes through the hassle of going through his/her reviews, judging whether he's allowed in, linking to some guides to helpful reviews and linking to the points system, only to find out that s/he did nothing and forgot all about the club...
Yes, it's a rule from the old club. Audio requests where rare and members who did audio reviews even rarer. So milinko gave out extra points for audio requests so members had an incentive to do those audio reviews. But now audio reviews give only 5 points as well.
In other words, the old club was heaven XD. Man, I took a quick look there, and there were like 10 people who finished all the requests in some updates, while over here we barely reach 5. This club needs more exposure :(. (Either that, or I scared everyone away with my enormous reviews :D)
At 11/30/09 04:51 PM, Supersteph54 wrote: Sorry for the double post, but while I was doing the spreadsheets, I found out that I don't really get what the 'Average per member' and 'Average per request' statistics are. Can someone explain, please?Just some statistics. "Average per member" is "total amount of reviews done by mebers divided by total nunber of members" and "average per request" is "number of members who have reviewed a requested flash/audioo/art divided by total number of members".
It's just some nice stats to play around with, you can leave them out if you want to.
I'm not planning on leaving them out; I want the update to be exactly like Sonofkirk's so you guys don't have anything new to get used to ^^. So, let me get this straight. If there are 10 members, 20 reviews written for requests, and 50 reviews written for requests and non-requests, then the average per request would be 2 and the average per member would be 5, right? Also, in other words, the Average per Member would always be equal to or larger than the Average per Request, won't it?
Review Request Club | CHECK THIS OUT | Formerly Supersteph54 | I'm an Audio Moderator. PM me for Audio Portal help.