Reviews for Pandemic: EoM

[MaidenHead]

Didn't beat the last

I didn't feel this was as good as the last Pandemic game, because this one seemed near impossible to do unless I'm missing something out. Why do countries start making a cure right away? I think they should start making it once people start dying... but I changed mine so that no one died, so I could spread it like the old game. I tried spreading the disease to different countries, but it just didn't work. I left my idea's for improvements in my review of the last one... there's no point me repeating myself. Disappointing, but it could have been worse.

[glennwinton]

Not as good as the original

Im sorry but, how did this make first page? this game is not very good, it is way to random. the graphics are better that the original but the gameplay is dumbed down and way too random. Make it less random and bring back the complexity of the original and then you got a game. Im still confused as to how this got front page.....

[timeshaper]

The logic behind this game is inconsistent and bad

Upon playing it I decided this was probably just a more difficult version. So I decided to see how long it would take to save my points up until I just died. Day 10, that's reasonable. Let's see what happens if I restart, and spend all the points on Day 9. On Day 2 my virus was eradicated. This is either shoddy planning or shoddy programing. The original game was incredibly fun, but unfortunately forumlaic in its functionality, which led to its easy victory. This one you must have tried to randomize some events. Well, it has backfired. I look forward to your next version, but I will never play this particular one ever again.

[yuri227]

Horrible

The first one was fun, this one didn't do anything except spend my points.

[arnonis]

mmm copy

that was bad game because it was made by pandemic fame...