Worst game ever? No. Best game? HELL no.
The game was, to be frank, mediocre. But I'm here to offer constructive criticism. The game would actually be pretty good, if you fixed two problems.
1. The fact that you had to start over if you lost. That's a gaming no-no, and you should know that.
2. Please, for the love of God, do a little homework before you make a game. Resources has one s, enemy has one n, Sergeant is spelled Sergeant, not sargent. You were also inconsistent between British and American spellings. Oh, and speaking of Sergeant. The person in the game wouldn't have been a Sergeant... he would have been a Captain, at the very least, more likely a Major. I know there are plenty of people out there reading this and thinking "stfu nird it dosent mtater" but it really does. It really, really does. To make a game really good, it has to look professional. It can be a decent game without looking professional, but if it looks like the author has learnt English as a second language (and this does. I apologise if the author is offended by that, but I'm trying to offer constructive criticism, not trying to be rude) then it is difficult to take it seriously. Not only that, excessive errors can just be extremely annoying.