it was okay
you had lots of facts wrong. like the fact that one didnt have purple streaks. and that it was a neighbor who drove them to school. and carried the weapons it brown paper bags. get yo facts straight. but ok job.
it was okay
you had lots of facts wrong. like the fact that one didnt have purple streaks. and that it was a neighbor who drove them to school. and carried the weapons it brown paper bags. get yo facts straight. but ok job.
Not exactly...
In reply to the person below me, this is not all truth of what happened. for baseing your submission onf Columbine your facts were a little sloppy. Like how you had the kid that resembled Brooks, thats not how it happened, also with Cassie, They never asked her if she believed in god, it was another girl. Brooks never knew what they were doing until it already happened, he was a few blocks away from the school and heard gunshots. There were other various areas in your film that werent researched fully. I having friends who attended Columbine when it happened, and having friends who were close to Eric and Dylan have a bit more information than whats released on sites. But not bad for an overall movie, it was good just not quite accurate
...
Pros: Graphics, music and "directing" style.
Cons: Romanticises the situation.
I can see sort of where you're coming from, by trying to show that the boys were a product of their environment. But you make it look as if the whole situation were an artistic tragedy out of some drama or something. Many of the people on newgrounds have the mental capacity of a clam, and I wouldn't put it past alot of them to see this and suddenly start viewing Eric and Dylan as "tragic heros".
(Note to the Finnish guy a few below me: You can't judge everyone in an entire country because you can't possibly know every person there. Example ; I don't think all of Finland is a bad place just because you're an ignorant, close minded dipshit. See how it works?)
.
the artwork was great, and the sound was better than in a lot of flashes. it's obvious to most that what they did was retarded, while their ideas may not have been. it's really fucked up that these authors feel they need to demonize those two even more with the whole evil laughs and stuff. we know what they did is stupid, just stick to the facts, not something that will make it seem even more inhuman.
also,(if that part actually happened in the real event) that girl was retarded. i hate christianity, but go ahead and believe it if you want, but fuck, believe it because it makes sense to you, not because people tell you it makes sense.
radioactive monkey......you are stupid. i hope you know that. i think you were probably just saying that for shits and giggles, but you sound like a retard. thank you to hades2662 for making him look like the idiot he is.
reminded me of a movie called elephant
that movie gained some noteriety recently, im sure youve heard of it. i didnt know, however, that it was so heavily based on what actually happened at columbine.
after i watched it i didnt like it because it seemed to lack any sort of thesis. then i thought about it a bit and i thought maybe the director was trying to portray the senselesness nature of the whole incident, or maybe, like you, was simply trying to show the facts.
i didnt enjoy watching this but im assuming thats the desired intent. keep it up guys.
from a technical standpoint, everything was great except some of the voices, you might want to invest in a higher quality microphone. otherwise great job and i look forward to seeing more of your work.