Reviews for Invasion 3

[Crackmonger]

This has huge potential...

The largest problem with the game is that there is no balance between units and the game becomes too easy. It should not be possible to just buy all archers and then mass deploy for the win every time. The high end units just seemed like glorified copies of the lower end units. Instead they should serve some special function.

Also, at the end of the round you get more and more money. After the first 3-4 rounds, the payout is so high that you get to buy hundreds of units and upgrade hundreds of times.... and then you mass again with even more powerful units and get even more money.

Bottom line - grant much less money at the end of each round, and try to find a way to make units work together so that its advantageous to buy several types, not just mass all the same kind.

[simpleDay]

wel not easy

its not easy its hard i die in 1 try lol and im a quiter so thats i gave it an 0 on the review

[Pietownguy]

Nothing new or amazing, but a good time-killer.

The sounds get a little repetitive, and it's annoying that the best units money can by are defeated by an arrow. Each unit more expensive than the last should have one more HP. Also, the buildings are pointless!

[Ingtinman]

Unbalanced

Did anyone else feel like the where ordering stuff for a store or like they were shopping? "Let's see... I need 50 soldiers, 30 archers..." but seriously, I thought it was a bit repetitive and unbalanced. Basically build hundreds of soldiers or hundreds of archers. Everything else was kind of useless. Balance it up up a bit and it'll have the potential to be a great game.

[Korgha]

Too easy

I did loads of levels by just spending every penny on infantry. Then i got bored and tried the same thing with every other unit. Only the archers won their battle. so the weakest units are teh best. You need to strengthen the better units.