At 12/27/03 07:11 AM, jonthomson wrote:Sad... but true! Good luck, man... but I'll certainly expect to see you on this list first.Well, with the new update (crazily quick!), I'm 2044 away from the blam list (down by 218) and 1995 away from the save list (down by 169)... which isn't a great deal different. And I think F-Day had already passed by your previous update, so that won't be taken into account in the save change...
Yeah, but while F-Day was a one day spike of protects, similar to Clock Day, this entire month of December has had higher than normal save rates. Things have been tending towards 50% of the new entries being deleted instead of the usual 66 to 75%.
Christmas certainly helped, but it'd been a month long trend, really.
The thing is... once New Year's is past, things are probably going to revert to Blam City once more.
And then you really WILL be a lot further from the saves list than you are from this one (or the combined).
while I'd still back myself to reach the blam list first, the save list won't be as far behind as we might have thought.
eh... maybe split the difference between your hopeful 12/21-12/26 based liberal estimate and my pessimistic, conservative estimate. Somewhere in between, no doubt, right on Moderate Road.
Of course, the big difference is that I don't even need to double my total to reach the blam list. I nearly need to treble my total to reach the save list.
indeed. And while things aren't as bleak as that period you got like 1000 blams during the rise from 500 to 600 saves... things aren't exactly equal between your saves and your blams, are they? #;-}>
Cheers for the updates anyway!
yarrrr. Glad to be providing another source of hope for ya, aside from the top 50 combined. You'll get the trifecta at some point, I AM assured of that.
At 12/27/03 11:48 AM, jonthomson wrote:At 12/27/03 03:05 AM, gfoxcook wrote: The Unofficial Newgrounds Top 50 Blammers List -- as of 12/26/2003 at 23:45 CDTJust curious - why do you bill it as the "Unofficial" top blammers list? Is that because it's not an official list (like the top 50 combined) or because you might be missing someone who should be included? If it's the latter, it won't be too long before the #50 on the blam list has more blam points than "annoying gap" on LockClock's list has combined, then you'd know that the top 50 is absolutely correct...
Mostly because it's not in the official NG list section (you don't see links to my two lists in the left column of any of the official NG top 50 lists, do you? #;-}>).
The day that liljim decides to make official top 50 blam and top 50 save lists, if it ever comes and replaces my lists here... is the day there will finally be official lists.
So no, to answer your question, it's not that I think there's inaccuracies in it right now. There was a couple updates back when I hadn't added ORKarate when I should have back in November, but I'm convinced it's accurate for now. Thanks for letting me know that little tidbit about the blank spot on LockClock's list. The thing is, if LockClock doesn't update that list often enough, another person could sneak up onto one of these lists without me knowing it. But that's weeks, if not months, away as a possibility.
Oh, but of course, these lists ARE always slightly imprecise, if not inaccurate, due to me being a human, and taking a couple of hours to actually get all the blam and save counts from everyone's profiles. Only the official NG lists can claim to present a true snapshot at one second of everyone's stats. God bless 'em.
gfox // wi/ht?#9 // defunct PentaList (final update: 3/15/2008) // Cyberdevil's HexaList!
a long, long time ago: 60000 b/p (#2) // 36000 blams (#3) // 24000 saves (#1)
